flying_bob

it can be fixed. it is only when you fly in hard snow area and it is only certain time of year. is is not wheelspary but engine wash spray http://aussiex.org/forum/index.php?/files/file/1572-remove-engine-snow-wash-effect-20-ft-below-plane/ other good effect changes: http://aussiex.org/forum/index.php?/files/file/1571-removed-clumps-from-wheelsnow-spray-effects-file/ http://aussiex.org/forum/index.php?/files/file/1556-removed-clumps-from-dust-effects-file/

yes sir I will send him on the double...!

+1 feel like it has been installed for ever. Still use it.

thank you kindly for sharing your spreadsheet

A2A go for 182. Absolutely enjoy every moment with her. hardly ever flown the 172

maybe heading over to hovercontrol, where it is all helo related forum, you might get help quicker

Files have been send

Bigsky I forwarded bliksimpie's files for you

I did not even know there was a latest paid version out. Just bought even though I am more then happy with freeware version. after years of using his program I just think it time to support the creator

Thanks John, That has just been a very good read indeed. I think I will hold onto the 780. Just heard lately of the 980, but for the money I dont think it is worth it. I am actually impressed with the comparison data between 780 and 980.

i have i7 overclocked to 4.5 (and very stable) but running a GTX780. Will it really make such a difference to get a 980? Would this 980 not sit and wait for CPU and idling along? if 980 get a yes, which one would you recommend, then I am reasonably content with what I have, but you know there is always going to be the question, but maybe it can be better Sorry I am not that technical

i have i7 overclocked to 4.5 (and very stable) but running a GTX780. Will it really make such a difference to get a 980? Would this 980 not sit and wait for CPU and idling along? if 980 get a yes, which one would you recommend, then I am reasonably content with what I have, but you know there is always going to be the question, but maybe it can be better Sorry I am not that technical

182 no doubt

it is just textures that is loaded. believe me if you have flown FSX a long time, when conditions is right for low cloud, you will notice immediately. Sorry there is not magic message that will appear to tell you it has been loaded. and now, there is neither something in a .cfg file that will indicate. The only way is to check the actual texture files date stamps that has been loaded. EG as example low cloud cummulus. Search for "cumulus01.bmp" (excluding inverted commas) in FSX directory should give you date modified details as 06 Jul 2014. If you have cumulus01.bmp file with date stamp of something like 2006, then yes it has not been loaded properly in FSX if the file is there with that date stamp then the files have been loaded in to FSX and then FSX will be using that file. Also take into consideration that many people use REX or ASN for weather engines, that MAKE huge difference in pertaining the effects.

I am refering to these and I know it is wip, but when the props turn, the cone should look like icing accured, but in blurred way, but in the picture below the props are turning and should not look like they are now. The pic below fit a prop that is standing still . Sorry my english is not the best. Hope you understand Also seen I am sure on your list, that when all shut down even battery, the annunciater warning lights still on.