Thank you for helping me.I encounter no "stutters" (not that flagrant) with any other aircrafts. (Such as Citation X or Legacy X for example)I get those freezes whether in VC or 2D or External view.I don't think it is an Antivirus scanning problem, since I do not have any problem with any other addons. (I use Avira Antivir)I'll try to check the manual. May be it has something to do with the refresh rate of the instruments or something like that.I haven't changed anything there and I do not have bad framerates, but I'll give it a try.Thanks for the link by the way.I will post on their forum too.

The new ERJ looks pretty good, but it looks like there are no windshield glass reflections (the windshield glass when you look at the model form the outside). Can somebody confirm?That is huge pet peeve of mine, always has been regarding aircraft for FS (I'm into the visuals as well as the simulation). The V2 looks to be a nice add-on though.I wish Feelthere would just do the glass like on the ERJ v1. It looks a lot more realistic than having the pilots just sit out in the open. If the effects aren't present, is there a way to add them via a texture edit with the alpha channel?Thanks

Hi Ark,Do a screenshot (FS9 or FSX?) parked somewhere of what you are looking for.I will go to the same location/time/season and do a screenshot and see what it looks like in the ERJv2.

I wish Feelthere would just do the glass like on the ERJ v1. It looks a lot more realistic than having the pilots just sit out in the open. If the effects aren't present, is there a way to add them via a texture edit with the alpha channel?Thanks

Have you seen this post? http://forum.iemit.com/Default.aspx?g=posts&t=3517

Have you seen this post? http://forum.iemit.com/Default.aspx?g=posts&t=3517

Thanks, Tom! I had not seen that post. As dumb as it may sound, little pet leeves like that keep me from purchasing (*waits for laughter*). Now That I know there is a fix out there I may go run and get this one. :)Thanks again!Vaughan, Tom's post relates to what I was referring too. Thanks for the offer to hwlp though! Much appreciated.

Ark,"Vaughan, Tom's post relates to what I was referring too. Thanks for the offer to hwlp though! Much appreciated."Yes, I thought I was pretty sure of that also.But, I wanted to see a photo from you .. to see exactly what you meant.I had already applied the "fix" and was ready to do a screenshot back to you .. for sure!Have a good day!

Ark,"Vaughan, Tom's post relates to what I was referring too. Thanks for the offer to hwlp though! Much appreciated."Yes, I thought I was pretty sure of that also.But, I wanted to see a photo from you .. to see exactly what you meant.I had already applied the "fix" and was ready to do a screenshot back to you .. for sure!Have a good day!

Thanks!If it isn't too much trouble, would you mind posting that screenshot anyways?Thanks, again.

Thanks!If it isn't too much trouble, would you mind posting that screenshot anyways?Thanks, again.

HelloHere you go ERJ135

HelloHere you go ERJ135

Great! Thank you for taking the time. :(

HelloBut to develop a 4:3 format panel when you know with some certainty that the majority of customers will be using widescreenmakes no sense at all, how much time and money to alter a panel graphic?.The yokes is something the leading developers have been doing for a long time now.A very large propotion of Feelthere customers fly in the VC and at the moment have to put up with a very large yoke waving aroundblocking their view.Same could be said about the nightlighting, to not be able to have a totally dark cockpit when they went to the trouble of making the displays dimmable seems odd.So they have managed to alienate the 2D crowd who have wide screen monitors, and at the same time make life hard for the VC flyersWith a little more time spent they maybe could have had even more money.The ERJ 145 is still a brilliant package at a great price, but I would have paid more to have these features included.These omissions wont stop me enjoying it, but I really hope SP1 has them included.

These are exactly the reasons I'm taking a pass on this. Over $45 is steep for no dark cockpit which is a particular pet peeve of mine.

From looking at the screenshots, the pilots look really tiny. Is this actually the case, or is it an optical illusion?

From looking at the screenshots, the pilots look really tiny. Is this actually the case, or is it an optical illusion?

I think that most people don't realize just how big an RJ really is. Even the "tiny" J-41 is actually very large when you're standing next to it.I think the pilots look fine.

No one but me has some issues using the ERJsV2 (FSX Windows XP 32bit) ?"Stutter" or "hiccups" ?Thank you.

I think that most people don't realize just how big an RJ really is. Even the "tiny" J-41 is actually very large when you're standing next to it.I think the pilots look fine.

I always thought the opposite in that I would say most folks don't realize just how small the ERJ is. lolFound this pic:Again, tough to see the ERJ offering though so maybe it is just the angle.

I always thought the opposite in that I would say most folks don't realize just how small the ERJ is. lolFound this pic:Again, tough to see the ERJ offering though so maybe it is just the angle.

Combination of the RLW pilot size lol and the angle of the shot...In FSX the pilot is shown larger from the side view as from the front view besidesit's not a big fellow lol I mean the co-pilot (maybe a bit to small) but the VC dimension are great :-) See below RLW shots from upfront where the pilot had (co-pilot is barely to see)...Cheers,Andr

Combination of the RLW pilot size lol and the angle of the shot...In FSX the pilot is shown larger from the side view as from the front view besidesit's not a big fellow lol I mean the co-pilot (maybe a bit to small) but the VC dimension are great :-) See below RLW shots from upfront where the pilot had (co-pilot is barely to see)...Cheers,Andr