January 16, 201016 yr BE 200 King Air / BE 350 King Air Please... :(I'm with ya buddy.With Pro Line 21. :( Dan
January 16, 201016 yr My votes... for an oldie - VC10, properly modelled systems and all, with RAF variants.For a not-so-oldie, Avro RJ series... some proper stuff to use out of EGLC. The Embraers are nice, but the RJ is so...... British!For a newbie - 787. Gotta love that new cockpit! Ian Pearse Old pilots never die, they just taxy off to a distant parking spot....
January 16, 201016 yr My votes... for an oldie - VC10, properly modelled systems and all, with RAF variants.Addictive Simulations http://www.vc10.com/ have a great VC-10 and it's systems are all available. it even works with the INS system available from elsewhere.What is so good about this VC-10 is that the VC view is as good as the 2D view for quality, to say nothing about those wonderful 'Conway' engine sounds. All in all, a great package for the price. ;) Dave Taylor
January 17, 201016 yr I hope none of you think this will influence PMDG, they dance to their own tunes. I heard a lot of requests before they made the last two aircraft, they didn't make any of them. Instead they made aircraft I don't remember anyone requesting.Jeff P.
January 17, 201016 yr I would recommend that pmdg make a 787(abacus one isn't that good) and the 747-8(no addon a seperate aircraft)
January 17, 201016 yr Commercial Member I hope none of you think this will influence PMDG, they dance to their own tunes. I heard a lot of requests before they made the last two aircraft, they didn't make any of them. Instead they made aircraft I don't remember anyone requesting.Jeff P.This isn't true - constant customer requests and the lack of a good one on the market is exactly why we've decided to make a 777 after the NG. Ryan MaziarzFor fastest support, please submit a ticket at http://support.precisionmanuals.com
January 17, 201016 yr HAHA !This is my first post on the 777 subject but I'm happy to say we have a SCOOP here !Now let's give place to all the 777 fans : ...Jean-Charles Montagne Jean-Charles Montagne
January 17, 201016 yr HAHA !This is my first post on the 777 subject but I'm happy to say we have a SCOOP here !Now let's give place to all the 777 fans : ...Jean-Charles MontagnePS : By saying "after the NG" do you mean "after the A320 that was supposed to be behind the NG" orthat there has been a slight change of plans ?I'm personaly eagerly awaiting an airbus from PMDG since I believe it would perfectly complement the Boeing andMcDonnell Douglas approaches to flight systems (speaking of jet airliners).Anyhow, the 777 is a very nice aircraft and I would certainly not miss my copy !Jean-Charles Montagne Jean-Charles Montagne
January 17, 201016 yr I hope none of you think this will influence PMDG, they dance to their own tunes. I heard a lot of requests before they made the last two aircraft, they didn't make any of them. Instead they made aircraft I don't remember anyone requesting.Jeff P.No, your quite wrong actually.The MD-11 was the result of a poll vote. Us oldies remember these things :( Dave Taylor
January 17, 201016 yr Avro RJ for me - I suppose ONE day lolJohn EllisonYes, I agree there's too many 777's and not one BAE146 or RJ85. :( Dave Taylor
January 17, 201016 yr Yes, I agree there's too many 777's and not one BAE146 or RJ85. :(Too many 777's? :( Philip D. Schmidt Jensen - Denmark
January 17, 201016 yr I disagree with the notion that there are too many T7. There is not any up to par for FSX.The Wilco T7 is not realistic (VC-wise) and is riddled with bugs and not supported well or updated since its release.The POS 2D is not realsitic at all and VC is far from fully featured.The NPSimpanel has problems to and have sometime to go. It is not as advertised. I tired it and not happy with it. I did not make one successful flight yet. It stalls and falls off the skies in the middle of the flightThere is nothing close to PSS T7 and it is only for FS9Bill C:|mydocuments\mypictures\my signature.htm
Create an account or sign in to comment