but im the one who leaked this picture from Facebook to twitter and Youtube which is how people found it

You can say that, but what proof do we have that this is true? Anyone could have said they leaked it.

It's not really a "leaked" image, just a screenshot they decided to remove for whatever reason, maybe because it was not in the official January releases. Also MS_FLIGHT does it matter who or why it was spread around? Did you post it here at AVSIM? News gets around, welcome to the internet... I don't get what you want. Recognition and thanks to your anonymous screen name? Bravo, good job mate.

No wait it was me who posted it, while on a CIA undercover mission in Redmond I gained access to top secret MS Flight photos. I took this one and decided to upload it for the world to see.If you wait five minutes for me to screenshot my Facebook page and go into PhotoShop I'll show you that it was I who did this

I know more Pictures from March that only few people know about. At least 500

Oh really?

I've seen that image before. Anyone who ordered the first PC Pilot Magazine with the Flight developer's diary saw this one.

I didn't say that Picture was leaked. I said most people didn't see that before. And only few people know about PC Pilots

And isn't this shot taken from Webisode 4?

The human brain easily recognizes things that it has seen before...no need to memorize anything. :(

Looks like MS are at it again, its the DX10 magic screenie revisited.Quite telling the original source image has been removed ... they must realise they are not dealing with idiot customers now.I'm really getting quite peee'd off with MS and their perceptions of our gullibility.Dear MS ... if you value your customers, please stop trying to fox us with shopped images, none of us are stupid here and you will always be caught out.I'm glad that image of the ship has been caught, it will be forever archived as one of their lies, just as the DX10 magic screenie for FSX was.Shame on you MS ... Shame.

It's not really a "leaked" image, just a screenshot they decided to remove for whatever reason,

Yeah, they knew they went a bit to far with the enhancements ... a bridge too far.They are at it big time and have been caught with their pants down IMHO.Wait and see, in time we'll be showing this screenshot and asking why, just like we did with the DX10 screenshot.Oh and we'll be hearing lame excuses too I'm sure :)

Looks like MS are at it again, its the DX10 magic screenie revisited.Quite telling the original source image has been removed ... they must realise they are not dealing with idiot customers now.I'm really getting quite peee'd off with MS and their perceptions of our gullibility.Dear MS ... if you value your customers, please stop trying to fox us with shopped images, none of us are stupid here and you will always be caught out.I'm glad that image of the ship has been caught, it will be forever archived as one of their lies, just as the DX10 magic screenie for FSX was.Shame on you MS ... Shame.

What the hell are you talking about? The Battleship screenshot has NOTHING to do with the old magic DX10 screenshot. One was not leaked, the other was. One was a GOAL for the team, the other was not. That screenshot of Flight that was leaked is the same as any other preview the Flight team has shown us....this one just wasn't supposed to be published.

Yeah, they knew they went a bit to far with the enhancements ... a bridge too far.They are at it big time and have been caught with their pants down IMHO.Wait and see, in time we'll be showing this screenshot and asking why, just like we did with the DX10 screenshot.Oh and we'll be hearing lame excuses too I'm sure :)

No words are needed, just eyeballs and a brain. :)^ Scanned first page of PCPilot Issue 73 MS Flight Article (Page 34).BTW, I really recommend buying PCPilot Magazine, Its really worth it! :)Jamie ♥

Somebody care to explain the "online experience" .... "and the online features"? FEATURE –Microsoft FlightOur exclusive developer’s diary continues, in the form of Q&A sessions - revealing the key aims and objectives of the Microsoft team. In this issue we learn more of the design, performance and online features of Microsoft Flight.

Somebody care to explain the "online experience" .... "and the online features"? FEATURE –Microsoft FlightOur exclusive developer’s diary continues, in the form of Q&A sessions - revealing the key aims and objectives of the Microsoft team. In this issue we learn more of the design, performance and online features of Microsoft Flight.

Explain, huh? One word: MultiplayerI believe my job is done here.

Somebody care to explain the "online experience" .... "and the online features"? FEATURE –Microsoft FlightOur exclusive developer’s diary continues, in the form of Q&A sessions - revealing the key aims and objectives of the Microsoft team. In this issue we learn more of the design, performance and online features of Microsoft Flight.

The word "features" (plural) is disheartening a little. I assume multiplayer is just a single feature. So what would the others be? Did they explain it in the article?

No words are needed, just eyeballs and a brain. :)BTW, I really recommend buying PCPilot Magazine, Its really worth it! :)Jamie ♥

Good find Jamie, somehow the view from top is a little ..well...underwhelming. I thought the docking area would be larger and blended into the adjacent scenery.

OMG Katana, there's the pulled photo from a different angle. Holy crap, I guess that blows your theories out of the water. I guess the "none of us are stupid here" comment doesn't apply anymore because it is obvious that one of us IS stupid here. Anyone care to guess who? Wonder who has their pants down now?For those wondering about the Multiplayer FeatureSSSSSS: Even in FSX we have Multiplayer, shared cockpit, Online ATC and control tower, so there are multiple features already. It could be a development of those along with a better game lobby.