Putting flight attendants in the NGX would be a great update especially if they looked like this!!!!!!!!! Devin Mack

Whoa momma. Southwest.

Only if the flight attendants were what they used to be flying would be a whole lot more entertaining

You're obviously flying the wrong airlines. I've had my fair share of entertaining FAs on SWA and AWI.

I take that back I've ridden on SWA where the flight attendants had the passengers singing like an asian tour bus

The blonde one at the back looks like that cop out of Chips

Whoa momma. Southwest.

I bet that pilot from Southwest that got busted last month for airing his frustrations over the lack of good looking FS's wishes they still looked and dressed like that :-)

The blonde one at the back looks like that cop out of Chips

Haha, you mean Bonnie Clark http://www.google.com/search?q=bonnie+clark+chips&hl=en&safe=off&prmd=ivnso&source=lnms&tbm=isch&ei=rcJATvf-AqzEsQKs9Zi5CQ&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CAsQ_AUoAQ&biw=1910&bih=920Sean Campbell

tell you what i had some crew members that were consider (neck snapers) i would love to have a crew like that on every flight...........

Could someone please explain to this layman why on earth it is that flight attendants aboard US-based carriers are so hard on the eyes these days ? I hear that Cathay Pacific, for example, staffs its aircraft with young, nubile Asian women that would quicken the pulse of any red-blooded male who sets eyes on them. Surely,if a commercial interest like the Hooters chain can select waitresses fundamentally due to their physical beauty, then a commercial airline SHOULD be entitled to exercise that same perogative in order to boost (male/business) passenger numbers. I'm mad as hell and I won't take it anymore. If I wanted my grandma to serve me tea, then I'd go visit her. Is there now a REQUIREMENT in US airlines that prevents women under 60 years old from applying for cabin crew jobs ? Rant over Tony

That is an old picture. Could be your mummy!

Could someone please explain to this layman why on earth it is that flight attendants aboard US-based carriers are so hard on the eyes these days ? I hear that Cathay Pacific, for example, staffs its aircraft with young, nubile Asian women that would quicken the pulse of any red-blooded male who sets eyes on them. Surely,if a commercial interest like the Hooters chain can select waitresses fundamentally due to their physical beauty, then a commercial airline SHOULD be entitled to exercise that same perogative in order to boost (male/business) passenger numbers. I'm mad as hell and I won't take it anymore. If I wanted my grandma to serve me tea, then I'd go visit her. Is there now a REQUIREMENT in US airlines that prevents women under 60 years old from applying for cabin crew jobs ? Rant over Tony

I hope you're joking, as that was completely inappropriate. Some people need to realize what flight attends do and - more importantly - not do. They're there to help you in an emergency, revive you in the event of cardiac arrest, and serve you food. Their industry is ENTIRELY different from "Hooters." An airplane ride is not a novelty- it is a form of transportation.

Well Ruben, I was writing only partly in jest, since I do consider it discriminatory to ASSUME that a physically attractive woman would be less capable of mastering cabin crew protocol that would her grandma. Also, if young and attractive women employed as cabin crew translate into more income for the airline, as Cathay Pacific have clearly deduced, why should a standard that PREVENTS such employment discretion be IMPOSED on airlines, when it clearly is not imposed on bars and restaurants in the same country ? Hypothetically, if you as a passenger had the option sitting through an 8-hour flight and being served by either of two IDENTIALLY trained and proficient flight attendants, would you chose the one that reminds you of your grandma, or would you prefer the young, toned one that makes you salivate like a demented hound ? Personally, I'd go for the younger model, if confronted with that option. Tony

Well Ruben, I was writing only partly in jest, since I do consider it discriminatory to ASSUME that a physically attractive woman would be less capable of mastering cabin crew protocol that would her grandma. Also, if young and attractive women employed as cabin crew translate into more income for the airline, as Cathay Pacific have clearly deduced, why should a standard that PREVENTS such employment discretion be IMPOSED on airlines, when it clearly is not imposed on bars and restaurants in the same country ? Hypothetically, if you as a passenger had the option sitting through an 8-hour flight and being served by either of two IDENTIALLY trained and proficient flight attendants, would you chose the one that reminds you of your grandma, or would you prefer the young, toned one that makes you salivate like a demented hound ? Personally, I'd go for the younger model, if confronted with that option. Tony

So what do you suggest? That all F/A's above the age of 35 get fired? Oh, and let us all fire male F/a's as well. Just to get your "red-blooded male pulse" going. This must be the biggest cave-men reaction I have read in years!!! Incredible!

Haha, you mean Bonnie Clark http://www.google.co...iw=1910&bih=920

I think he meant this one: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0928243/ And I believe he is right, there is an uncanny resemblance, as disturbing as it may be.

I think he meant this one: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0928243/ And I believe he is right, there is an uncanny resemblance, as disturbing as it may be.

Yep thats the one I meant, reminds of days as a kid wanting to be a motorcycle cop wearing sunglasses!