Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
maddoc

Lod_Radius 6,5 or 10,5 ?

Recommended Posts

Does anyone note any differences in using the lod_radius at 6,5 or 10,5 changing it via the p3d.cfg file ??

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post

I'm using 16.5.  I use LOD_RADIUS=16.500000 to define how far away from the aircrafts ground position ground textures are loaded to the clearest level.  I think each LOD is a tiles distance.  I don't see much impact on a GTX 780 with that setting, in fact I might try higher, but it gives a fairly realistic appearance.

Share this post


Link to post

16.5 ???  :blink:

If you set such value in FSX or P3D 1.4 maybe you can wait for 20-30 minutes to load the scenery.

 

Is P3D 2.2 different in this? 

I have to try this value at least ine time...

Share this post


Link to post

Ok, so did you try it?  What did it do?  Am I hallucinating?

Share this post


Link to post

What I wish to know is if really increasing the lod radius we will get better resolution texture. It seems to be no significative difference between lod_radius6,5 or 10,5 just like 6,5 is the maximum allowed setting.

What 'a your experience about that ??

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post

Are texture mipmaps really controlled by LOD_RADIUS? I thought  it was MipBias that caused sharper textures to be used at a distance.


Barry Friedman

Share this post


Link to post

I am almost certain I see a difference at 16.5.  Photoreal ground textures are drawn out farther.

Share this post


Link to post

I am almost certain I see a difference at 16.5.  Photoreal ground textures are drawn out farther.

One call it the placebo effect.

Spirit

Share this post


Link to post

Are texture mipmaps really controlled by LOD_RADIUS? I thought  it was MipBias that caused sharper textures to be used at a distance.

o.k. good to know! Can that "MipBias"-value be changed?

 

I find the loading of textures very anoying when I fly close to it... I would love to see that those sharper textures would "fade" in (like the AutoGen does) or "morph-in".

 

Also to see the mesh resolution beeing so low in the distance is spoiling some reality for me. Can that be changed?


IXEG 737 Beta-Tester and First Officer

i7 6700K@4.4GHz, 32GB RAM, Palit GTX 1080 GameRock Premium@2Ghz, Oculus Rift S, ButtKicker
X-Plane 11 latedt version on a Samsung M.2 SSD for speedy loading times

Share this post


Link to post

I am almost certain I see a difference at 16.5.  Photoreal ground textures are drawn out farther.

Can you take two screenshots one with 6.5 and another one with 16.5 please? :)

Share this post


Link to post

Can you take two screenshots one with 6.5 and another one with 16.5 please? :)

 

This. I'd be interested to see the results, especially given that LM are supposed to have capped it at 6.5,

Share this post


Link to post

But that might distort my reality.  Why would I do that?  I'm happy.

 

Maybe later this morning I can investigate my visions..

Share this post


Link to post

In that case I'm setting mine at 17.5 and will then sit back and bask in my reflected glory :P

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...