Sign in to follow this  
PAINMAN

Flytampa/FSDG EHAM and the NGX WIP pictures

Recommended Posts

Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

Depends on the traffic ai load.

If you raise the bar high you will struggle.

I have the ai at 50 % and I'm having around 20 to 30 fps.

A little lower in rush hour

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the traffic ai load.

If you raise the bar high you will struggle.

I have the ai at 50 % and I'm having around 20 to 30 fps.

A little lower in rush hour

 

You have to switch AI traffic completely off to give a valid answer to performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't know exactly what fps I do have without the ai.

But it's more anyways I can tell you that, and offcourse it depends on your system.

My system is probably not the same as his and my other settings are probably not the same as any one else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't know exactly what fps I do have without the ai.

But it's more anyways I can tell you that, and offcourse it depends on your system.

My system is probably not the same as his and my other settings are probably not the same as any one else.

I know you cant compare, but I was hoping to get to know if it runs bad compared to any other addon scenery on tour system, since the aerosoft version was kind of FPS heavy no matter what Specsavers you have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the traffic ai load.

If you raise the bar high you will struggle.

I have the ai at 50 % and I'm having around 20 to 30 fps.

A little lower in rush hour

You have it set at 50% but didn't mention what AI traffic your using. WOAI, MTX or UT2.

 

Is this FSX or P3D?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice, waiting for the comparison with the Aerosoft product!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using WOAI and it's in p3d.

I didn't own aerosofts EHAM so I can't compare the 2 sorry.

My computer is quite old and it runs just fine so if you have a high end PC I don't see why it shouldn't run great

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from the screenshots seems lacking in color fidelity than FT's other works.

 

have become bored of EU/US airports though that many have been done twice, wonder why no quality developer is yet covering FIMP, WSSS, FAOR and the likes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using WOAI and it's in p3d.

I didn't own aerosofts EHAM so I can't compare the 2 sorry.

My computer is quite old and it runs just fine so if you have a high end PC I don't see why it shouldn't run great

That's good to know and might explain some of the FPS hit you get. As you may know or WOAI uses FS9 models which will work but are not as efficient as using FSX native models. Also WOAI flight plans are (often) compiled using the 1% density setting for airliners which means that setting your slider to 50% is the same as setting it to 100%, unless you recompiled the flight plans and changed the density settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I havent recompiled anything so its all "straight out of the box".

Lacking in colour? my screenshots are taken straight from the sim with Active Sky 2016 real world weather and it was gray and rainy when the shots were taken.

And remember these shots are taken with an early beta and does not represent final product.

 

eham4.jpg

 

A nice day shot in comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from the screenshots seems lacking in color fidelity than FT's other works.

 

have become bored of EU/US airports though that many have been done twice, wonder why no quality developer is yet covering FIMP, WSSS, FAOR and the likes.

 

I can see where you are coming from but I think a lot of people have been waiting for a new version of EHAM due to how bad performance wise the Aerosoft one is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any higher res screens by any chance?

 

Seems the quality is quite poor on those small shots, to me it looks like aerosofts version from here ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this