May 16, 20188 yr The big ship is not dead..... Interesting read. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-16/boeing-747s-given-up-for-dead-find-new-life-in-air-cargo-surge?utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=bd&utm_campaign=headline&cmpId=yhoo.headline&yptr=yahoo&ref=yfp Frank Patton Corsair 5000D Airflow Case; MSI B650 Tomahawk MOB; Ryzen 7 7800 X3D CPU; ASUS RTX 4080 Super; NZXT 360mm liquid cooler; Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 4800 MHz RAM; RMX850X Gold PSU;; ASUS VG289 4K 27" Display; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener. Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126 "I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere
May 16, 20188 yr Good read. I still wonder if the passenger queen, or something much like it, will come back. It is one of the few planes that has a mystique about flying on it. Gregg Seipp "A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane. A great landing is when you can reuse it." i9 64GB RAM, GTX-5090
May 16, 20188 yr Thanks for the interesting article. Now find one that says their going to keep the Maddog flying another decade and increase my joy even more.😀 Vic green
May 16, 20188 yr 5 hours ago, fppilot said: The big ship is not dead Yes indeed https://flightaware.com/live/aircrafttype/B744?;offset=80;order=filed_ete;sort=DESC 747 Captain for the last 39 years, and still learning.
May 16, 20188 yr That is exactly what the original design was, Boeing saw the 747 as a Freighter and could also be used for passenger service for a short term solution until they developed new passenger aircraft, and the 747 passenger aircraft could be converted to freighters. The fact that it became so popular as a passenger aircraft came as a surprise. Reason for the hub was so the flight deck goes above and freight goes below through the nose, this design has no value as a passenger aircraft, it was designed to be a freighter. Matthew Kane I'm Dyslexic, what's an error to you is not to me
May 16, 20188 yr The big UPS order was a pleasant surprise for the -8F. I love the 747 series, and I'm glad they will still be flying for quite a while. Unfortunately, as the article points out, a spike in fuel prices could change the trend. LUIS LINARES Processor: Intel Core i9 6700K 9900K (5.0 GHz Turbo) Eight Core; CPU Cooling: NXXT Kraken X62 280mm CPU Liquid Cooler; System Memory: 64GB Corsair DDR4 SDRAM @ 3200 MHz, RGB; Graphics Processor: 11GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, GDDR6, Primary Drive: 2TB Samsung 850 Pro Solid State Drive (SSD)
May 17, 20188 yr 17 hours ago, Luis_KMIA said: The big UPS order was a pleasant surprise for the -8F. I love the 747 series, and I'm glad they will still be flying for quite a while. Unfortunately, as the article points out, a spike in fuel prices could change the trend. Another big 747 fan here - I've been lucky that one of my well travelled routes (LGW to MCO) is still flown by 747s but I will miss that lovely upper deck cabin when Virgin moves to A350s on the route within the next few years. With regard to freighter 747s, I hope enough orders will trickle through to enable the 747-8F to remain in production but I fear Boeing's own 777F, with its lower purchase cost and superior economics while still carrying a very good payload over a long range, will continue to grab many orders that might otherwise have gone the way of the 747. I agree that rising oil prices, trade wars or an economic slump (all of which seem increasingly likely in this turbulent world political climate) could sadly spell the end for the venerable 747. Bill
May 17, 20188 yr The problem with orders for the 747-8F is the fact that they have surplus 747-400 sitting in the desert. If you were a cargo op would you purchase brand new 747-8F for $400 million each or would you try and negotiate 2 or 3 converted 747-400's for around the same price? If it wasn't for all of those surplus 747-400 the 747-8F would have a heftier order book. Matthew Kane I'm Dyslexic, what's an error to you is not to me
May 18, 20188 yr 4 hours ago, Matthew Kane said: The problem with orders for the 747-8F is the fact that they have surplus 747-400 sitting in the desert. If you were a cargo op would you purchase brand new 747-8F for $400 million each or would you try and negotiate 2 or 3 converted 747-400's for around the same price? If it wasn't for all of those surplus 747-400 the 747-8F would have a heftier order book. True, but as the article points out, the supply of airworthy surplus 747-400 aircraft suitable for freighter conversion is rapidly being exhausted. Many are already spoken for and under contract. Not all of the 744s in various aircraft boneyards are good candidates for conversion. Some are extremely high-time airframes, which will probably be parted out and scrapped. But... oil prices are on a definite upward trend, which could change the equation in coming months if the price of crude goes back to $100 per barrel again. Jim BarrettLicensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.