April 14, 20206 yr Post processing with FS9-Windows10 it's possible! SweetFX work. Edited April 14, 20206 yr by efis007 [Pc Intel i3-4160 3,6 GHz, 8 GB di RAM, GeForce RTX-3060 12 GB, Win10 Home 64 bit]
April 14, 20206 yr Indeed, good ole FS9 looks great! Intel i-9 13900KF @ 6.0 Ghz, MSI RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid X 24GB, MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360, MSI Z790 A-PRO WIFI, MSI MPG A1000G 1000W, G.SKILL 48Gb@76000 MHz DDR5, MSI SPATIUM M480 PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2TB, Windows 11 Pro Ghost Spectre x64 “We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the day and night to visit violence on those who would do us harm”.
April 15, 20206 yr I must admit, that 2nd one looks stunning. Yeah its impressive it looks so great. What add-ons are you using? The sky textures and sun are incredible!
April 15, 20206 yr Yes, sweet indeed...! Agree, I, too, love your 2nd shot...the glow of the Sun looks almost real...beautiful picture...!!
April 15, 20206 yr FS2004 looks familiar to me... No need to say that the pictures are superb! Harald Geyer Gründer der Messerschmitt Freunde Dresden v. V.
April 16, 20206 yr 11 hours ago, Stratocaster said: These are really great, and shows how far we have not come. Sad but true. Take a look at all those FS9 images with the 'unofficial' orbx textures. Looks far better then FSX/P3D(een V5) default does. Quite a bit more. Something not right there me thinks.
April 16, 20206 yr 12 hours ago, Stratocaster said: These are really great, and shows how far we have not come. Well...yes and no. At least in case of XP11, if you add free photoscenery (which is not available at that detail and quality in FS9), you'll get to realize, how far we have come 😊😊 Any attempt to stretch fuel is guaranteed to increase headwinds My specs: AMD Radeon RX6700XT, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 32GB RAM, 34" monitor, screen resolution: 2560x1080
April 17, 20206 yr 21 hours ago, Doug47 said: Sad but true. Take a look at all those FS9 images with the 'unofficial' orbx textures. Looks far better then FSX/P3D(een V5) default does. Quite a bit more. Something not right there me thinks. I'm not sure it looks better, and is obviously not legal, but, it's not that far behind. 20 hours ago, bernd1151 said: Well...yes and no. At least in case of XP11, if you add free photoscenery (which is not available at that detail and quality in FS9), you'll get to realize, how far we have come 😊😊 There are only two main things really: terrain resolution is very limiled in 2004, and there is very limited shadowing options. Other than that, and yes, a few other things (mainly down to third parties) these sixteen years or so, have not gained us that much.
April 17, 20206 yr 7 minutes ago, Stratocaster said: I'm not sure it looks better, and is obviously not legal, but, it's not that far behind. To my eyes it looks a LOT better then FSX/P3D default. They aren't really that impressive. I watched a v5 default ony video yesterday that didn't look any better then my FSX. Which is bland and lifeless default. 😲 I guess everyone's eyes is different. :)
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.