9 hours ago, F737NG said:

Over-representation of trees are still an issue.

And the wrong type, so many "conifers" everywhere...  Also, every tree in MSFS2020 is so perfectly formed, uniform and "lush"... Not a single dead leaf, branch or tree to be seen anywhere.

MSFS2020 is a postcard. It's just sooo luvely and purrrfect 😻🌲.....  🤦‍♂️

Just now, MatthewS said:

MSFS2020 is a postcard. It's just sooo luvely and purrrfect 😻🌲.....  🤦‍♂️

Rather have that, than a flat, cardboard, X-plane tree, though........  

 

I'd be word not allowed if I can't take a heli, hover in front of a skyscraper and watch TV through the window.

8 minutes ago, HiFlyer said:

Rather have that, than a flat, cardboard, X-plane tree, though

So you think accurately sized, realistically varied trees and the current Asobo "3d" modelling technique are mutually exclusive? 🤦‍♂️ It's a nice excuse though.

1 minute ago, MatthewS said:

So you think accurately sized, realistically varied trees and the current Asobo "3d" modelling technique are mutually exclusive? 🤦‍♂️ It's a nice excuse though.

And....... that's a nice attempt to put words in my mouth.

2 minutes ago, HiFlyer said:

And....... that's a nice attempt to put words in my mouth.

Oh really?  🙄

18 minutes ago, HiFlyer said:

Rather have that, than a flat, cardboard, X-plane tree, though........ 

So what is your point then?  Don't speak in riddles.  You clearly think we can't have both (3d trees and correct size & variety).  🤦‍♂️

9 hours ago, F737NG said:

Back on-topic.

Over-representation of trees are still an issue.

While there are trees around in the real world, there are nowhere near as many, or as big, as the ones shown in the MSFS screenshot.
 

But they look sooo good.  I wish they were bigger.

Cheers

bs

Edited June 29, 20205 yr by bean_sprout

3 minutes ago, MatthewS said:

You clearly think we can't have both (3d trees and correct size & variety).  🤦‍♂️

No, what I think is that if I was choosing between the two, I would take the MSFS trees even as they are; any day.

That's not a riddle, its a pretty plain sentence that said exactly what it said, and not a thing more.

Especially as Asobo is innovating quite quickly, which is not something I can say for X-planes trees, which have been cardboard for at least a decade.

16 minutes ago, MatthewS said:

Oh really?  🙄

So what is your point then?  Don't speak in riddles.  You clearly think we can't have both (3d trees and correct size & variety).  🤦‍♂️

Confucius he say;

"Better to speak in riddles with mind open,

Than to speak nothing with mind closed."

You make a lot of noise Matthew.

But there isn't an awful lot making it across.

 

Edited June 29, 20205 yr by Will Fly For Cheese

5 minutes ago, bean_sprout said:

But they look sooo good.

I agree. The only trees I have seen in a flightsim that even approached them for realism were the speed-trees in MsFlight.

Edited June 29, 20205 yr by HiFlyer

9 minutes ago, Will Fly For Cheese said:

Better to speak in riddles with mind open

Clearly you are confused about what he says, but try reading his statement again, and slowly. 🤦‍♂️

It's his mind that is closed because he thinks we can't have both (3d trees of correct size/variety). 🤣

 

1 minute ago, MatthewS said:

Clearly you are confused about what he says, but try reading his statement again, and slowly. 🤦‍♂️

It's his mind that is closed because he thinks we can't have both (3d trees of correct size/variety). 🤣

 

Wow........ Once again, I'm reminded that it takes all kinds, to make an Avsim. ✈️

4 minutes ago, HiFlyer said:

Wow........ Once again, I'm reminded that it takes all kinds, to make an Avsim.

Like yourself? You've already back-flipped on your previous statement. What a surprise. 🤣

Edited June 29, 20205 yr by MatthewS

27 minutes ago, Will Fly For Cheese said:

Confucius he say;

"Better to speak in riddles with mind open,

Than to speak nothing with mind closed."

You make a lot of noise Matthew.

But there isn't an awful lot making it across.

 

That last sentence is the important one for me, because at this point I'm leaning away from my monitor and thinking "What. The. Heck?"

2 hours ago, MatthewS said:

So you think accurately sized, realistically varied trees and the current Asobo "3d" modelling technique are mutually exclusive? 🤦‍♂️ It's a nice excuse though.

Errr, where exactly did Hiflyer express that thought? Looks to me you are drawing your own conclusions.

Or maybe... Can you tell me what I think now? 😲