Just now, Farlis said:

It totally does.

I fly the FFW A320, the stock Longitude, and most of the stock GA with NO issues

Same here, most of the RNAVs and ILS approaches work on my other planes.

There are some messed up ones in the sim, but other airports are aligned correctly.   It just seems it got worse with whatever they did with the update....

At least the engine does not blow, and spray oil all over the window like the new Melvis corsair...

 

34 minutes ago, Farlis said:

It totally does.

I haven't flown every plane that comes with MSFS but have not run into this problem in those I have.

1 hour ago, Prpn said:

If you are going to resort to work arounds, better to just fly manual from 1000ft but at the correct speed.

Well that's about what I said.

2 hours ago, Farlis said:

It totally does.

I think you may still be referring to the issue that Aerosoft kept blaming on the sim before the update. Since the update, the CRJ is using custom glideslope logic, so how can that affect other A/C? I flew the same approach multiple times, CRJ fails every single time. Other A/C no problems. Multiple random airports I tested this at. Same result every time.

13 minutes ago, Prpn said:

I flew the same approach multiple times, CRJ fails every single time. 

Same here, so it's flying GS manually until this is sorted out. 

Even more embarrassing is NAV mode. During cruise, at every waypoint change more than 30deg there are horrible S-Turns. Turn anticipation too early, and then much too aggressive  30deg bank for small corrections. I wouldn't want to be passenger in that plane. 

The plane is now six years in development (P3D versions included). One could think that should be enough time to program reasonable route intercepts. 

Mike 

1 hour ago, mikealpha said:

Same here, so it's flying GS manually until this is sorted out. 

Even more embarrassing is NAV mode. During cruise, at every waypoint change more than 30deg there are horrible S-Turns. Turn anticipation too early, and then much too aggressive  30deg bank for small corrections. I wouldn't want to be passenger in that plane. 

The plane is now six years in development (P3D versions included). One could think that should be enough time to program reasonable route intercepts. 

Mike 

...are you trying to be helpful with the 3rd paragraph? True or not, it's ugly sentiment to spew outloud. 😕

20 minutes ago, rlk281 said:

...are you trying to be helpful with the 3rd paragraph? True or not, it's ugly sentiment to spew outloud. 😕

This issue plagues the CRJ since the beginning years ago, and I have bought all versions since then. It would be helpful if the developers at SOME point decide to tackle this instead of carrying it over endlessly from version  to version. 

17 minutes ago, rlk281 said:

...are you trying to be helpful with the 3rd paragraph? True or not, it's ugly sentiment to spew outloud. 😕

I will not speak for mikealpha, but I think you are misreading.

You should see it as a simple statement of fact, and people should be aware of it, especially those considering purchase. The LNAV has never functioned properly in any version of the CRJ released by Aerosoft. Based on that, one sensible person could suppose it may never work properly, or even that the developer is unable to make it work properly, if it has not been done in 6 years of development.