Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
abrams_tank

PMDG DC-6 to be released on Friday, June 18th

Recommended Posts

I love coming into this forum - it makes me feel so young!  :smile:

I have my heart set on a DC-3, but I will certainly be taking a look at this.

Edited by bobcat999
  • Like 3

Call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind, but I prefer Rob.

I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio.

Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's.  Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, bobcat999 said:

I love coming into this forum - it makes me feel so young!  :smile:

I have my heart set on a DC-3, but I will certainly be taking a look at this.

If the DC-6 sells well, they might just do that. They only have to remove 2 engines and move the nosewheel back a bit to make it a DC-3😀 (ducks)
In fact, i'd love to see the entire DC range in this sim in this quality.

  • Like 1

Flightsim rig:
PC: AMD 5900x with Dark Rock Pro 4 cooler | MSI X570 MEG Unify | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo | Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX 3090 | Corsair RM850x | Fractal Define 7 XL
AV: Acer Predator x34 3440x1440 monitor | Logitech Z906 speakers
Controllers: Fulcrum One Yoke | MFG Crosswind v2 pedals | Honeycomb Bravo TQ | Stream Deck XL | TrackIR 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, orchestra_nl said:

If the DC-6 sells well, they might just do that. They only have to remove 2 engines and move the nosewheel back a bit to make it a DC-3😀 (ducks)...

Whoa there!.. Carl will be after you! 😀

  • Like 2

Call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind, but I prefer Rob.

I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio.

Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's.  Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe one or two other changes will be needed, but Bob and I will discuss that while floating in his backyard pool.

😉

  • Like 2

Best-

Carl Avari-Cooper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, orchestra_nl said:

If the DC-6 sells well, they might just do that. They only have to remove 2 engines and move the nosewheel back a bit to make it a DC-3😀 (ducks)
In fact, i'd love to see the entire DC range in this sim in this quality.

I was always surprised that PMDG has not created a DC-3. The company actually owns one, so accurate source material is right at hand. There is a whole series of YouTube videos documenting the (multi stop) flight that Robert and crew made a couple of years ago via the Blue Spruce route (Canada-Greenland-Iceland-Scotland) to take it to the UK for the 75th anniversary celebration of D-Day

Edited by JRBarrett

Jim Barrett

Licensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JR- it’s equally enchanting in the Six.

  • Like 1

Best-

Carl Avari-Cooper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the versions in the other sims have a Flight Engineer, FSX, or P3D? If indeed it was available in those sims? If not having it in MSFS is going to help it a ton, especially if it can also be flown on PC & X-Box and if it comes in at a decent price. What is decent is different for everyone. I'm thinking $60.00 it will sell like hot cakes, over that it might, and i have no idea, just be the loyal PMDG customers and maybe a few extra.

Will be interesting to see. And either way it eventually makes it to the Market Place, so include those people down the road like me. Can't wait to see all the videos from different people that fly it different ways. The lets get this thing off the ground and in the air, to let's go by actual procedure to fire this thing up. Looks to me like ti might please all those people, which is very good indeed 🙂


"Coffee, if your not shaking, you need another cup"
Flight Sim Break Discord Channel: https://discord.com/invite/fCV62Ka2QZ

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, in2tech said:

Did the versions in the other sims have a Flight Engineer, FSX, or P3D? If indeed it was available in those sims?

I have the P3D DC-6B and it has the AFE. I don't think there was an FSX version of the aircraft.


My system specs: Intel i9-10850@3.6 - 5.2 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, 32GB  DDR4  RAMNoctua NH-D15 CPU Cooler,1TB Seagate SSD, 4TB Seagate HD, Windows 10, Asus 32 inch monitor, Saitek Yoke, Throttle Quadrant, Rudder Pedals and Trim Wheel     Sims: MSFS2020      Preferred Aircraft  Black Square Bonanza, and Baron, A2A Comanche, PMDG DC-6, Red Wing L1049 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Der Zeitgeist said:

But I also had a bunch of people immediately jump into the discussion telling me how the stock MSFS flight planner and nav database wasn't even worth using anyway, that "everyone was using Navigraph" and its charts anyway and if I insisted on using the stock MSFS flight planner and nav database, I shouldn't be using the WT mods. 

I certainly hope you didn't get that kind of answer from anyone on the server with WT colors.  We firmly believe in creating a sim community that is friendly and open to all virtual aviators, whether they're grizzled sky gods or folks flying 737s under bridges with controllers.  It sounds as though some members of the general userbase of our server may have failed that test, though, and for that I apologize at the same time as I hope folks understand they don't speak for us as an organization.

For the topic in general, I can offer from the developer's perspective that trying to support those "twin worlds" of both serious and casual simmers -- and the folks in between, it's not a dichotomy, it's an axis, and people can move along it by the day -- can be a real challenge at times.   It can come up in areas where you wouldn't expect it, such as whether you should actually reduce the performance or visual quality of something to make it better match the "real thing".

(Yes, "should our stuff perform worse?" is a question we have occasionally bounced around amongst ourselves.  Mostly jokingly, sure, but I think the point it proves is a real one.)

And, yes, more germane to your comment in particular, "Are the people who care about this thing only using Navigraph, anyway?" has also come up for topics related to navdata and ATC now and then.  Sometimes two things are truly in conflict, in a way that can't really be solved to mutual satisfaction, at least not within the bounds of time and resources available.   For those you have to make a judgement call and accept that some people won't be as happy as others.

It's tough, but it's also the kind of quandary that is part of a professional developer's job on a regular basis.  The best you can do is the best you can do, and hopefully you get it right more often than not.

But you can't please all the people all the time, and so forth.  🙂

 

 

Edited by kaosfere
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Andreas Stangenes said:

The SDK was much more advanced and competent than what we were lead to believe by the complaints from 3PD. It was just written in a different programming language, so the 3PD would have to learn to program in that new way to make use of it. Also, I do belive that the manuals for the SDK was very limited, so it was difficult for them to utilize it. I am losely paraphrasing Matt Nischan here 🙂

And doing so fairly accurately. 🙂   Now, to be fair, there are some limitations in the current SDK.   Some of those are holes due to missing features, others are limitations due to the design decisions made regarding how the sim was going to be built and work.  But, I would wager that it's complete enough to support most things that the vast majority of users, even serious ones, care about.  And I think the public statements, and actions, from PMDG strongly support that suggestion.

At this point, I feel like the most visibly fervent of the complainers who actually know what they are talking about, and are not just people parroting the "common knowledge" because it suits their own personal prejudices, are those who are bumping up against one or another of the legitimate limitations of the current SDK in a way that hinders their own personal use case.

Some of those developers deal with the situation rationally, and are able to see the good in the sim and understand their place in things at the same time as they are legitimately frustrated with their own individual problems.  Others have decided instead to bear personal grudges against people involved, attack the sim and everything around it, insinuate that anyone who disagrees with them has no idea what they're talking about, and then tout their own experience and ability as evidence of their superiority as though it makes them automatically correct and immune to all criticism.

And, honestly, those people are best left ignored.  While they're ranting and raving about what they can't do and how broken the game is, other people are figuring out ways to make it work and eating their lunch.

 

Edited by kaosfere
  • Like 9
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, AviatorMan said:

I have the P3D DC-6B and it has the AFE. I don't think there was an FSX version of the aircraft.

as in a pantomime, "oh yes there is".

3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First thank you to everyone.  I will be purchasing the PMDG-DC6 

A quick short story if I may from my days in RAF MT ( motor transport) I was a duty chauffeur for the VIP Johnny Johnson 

Princess Margret came to RAF Wittering to scramble 6 Vulcans they were on there pans engine on idle. She pressed the Scramble button 6 land rovers with the crews onboard raced to there aircraft and were gone . The noise and that sight is still with me today unbelievable . An other thing we saw at RAF Wittering but weren't allowed to speak about. Vulcan crews returning to Wittering from low level flying exercise in Canada's  goose bay loaded with Fresh whole Salmon Mmmmm

Take care everyone and thanks again

  • Like 3

i7 10700k 3.8 ghz Nvida RTX 2080 super.32 go ram ddr4 3000mhzAdata 1TB SX8200 proM2 ssd X2 Samsung 860 evo 1TB Sata.Samsung LC 49RG90SSUXEN curved monitor 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is going to be an interesting and exciting release, but I will be interested in reading some feedback about the performance.

Edited by Rockliffe

Howard
MSI Mag B650 Tomahawk MB, Ryzen7-7800X3D CPU@5ghz, Arctic AIO II 360 cooler, Nvidia RTX3090 GPU, 32gb DDR5@6000Mhz, SSD/2Tb+SSD/500Gb+OS, Corsair 1000W PSU, Philips BDM4350UC 43" 4K IPS, MFG Crosswinds, TQ6 Throttle, Fulcrum One Yoke
My FlightSim YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@skyhigh776

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Andreas Stangenes said:

The DC6 has had the AFE included in all versions. 

A noteable other addon that had this was the Concorde from FSLabs for FSX and P3D. 

A2A Connie.


 

BOBSK8             MSFS 2020 ,    ,PMDG 737-600-800 FSLTL , TrackIR ,  Avliasoft EFB2  ,  ATC  by PF3  ,

A Pilots LIfe V2 ,  CLX PC , Auto FPS, ACTIVE Sky FS,  PMDG DC6 , A2A Comanche, Fenix A320, Milviz C 310

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...