PMDG Update: PMDG 737 now "unstuck" after talks with Asobo

[RichUK 474]

Randazzo street will be right back after the break..

[omarsmak30 4,068]

9 minutes ago, RichUK said:

Randazzo street will be right back after the break..

Yeah he has a list of “worry items”, I think one of these items is “hello world” 😂 (those who know programming will know what I mean)

[RichUK 474]

1 minute ago, omarsmak30 said:

Yeah he has a list of “worry items”, I think one of these items is “hello world” 😂 (those who know programming will know what I mean)

lol yep! Not a programmer, but understand where you are coming from!

[fogboundturtle 2,708]

7 minutes ago, omarsmak30 said:

Yeah he has a list of “worry items”, I think one of these items is “hello world” 😂 (those who know programming will know what I mean)

Git is next on your list of teaching PMDG 😛 

[harrry 322]

I side with PMDG this time.   They ask the sim builder a question.  There is a Gaullic shoulder shrug and no answer.  

It is important to know when loading has finished so there is no chance of starting the next stage from a bad state.  Detecting it by observing other things is one thing but they may change,

If you have a car stopped  on a hill which has power brakes and you turn the ignition key,  turn the engine to start wait 5 seconds and release the brakes you may find you do not have any when you try to stop.

To be certain you do need a way to determine the engine is running and generally you do.

Question asked  not answered as everyone knows that, question asked not answered as everyone knows that,,,,,,how long can that go on before tempers are lost.

[Bdub22 1,628]

17 minutes ago, harrry said:

Question asked  not answered as everyone knows that

Apparently that's not true. As mentioned in the Q&A, several other developers were able to figure the issue out and without all the drama. RSR made it seem like he was given the cold shoulder and today that was completely proven to be not true. So, someone here isn't telling the truth and I have an idea who that might be...............

[simon747 185]

Who cares!  What a pointless discussion about who's issue it is.  The simulator has been out for a year and a half and now and it needs the PMDG 737 in it for sure!  lol.

[Stearmandriver 2,333]

45 minutes ago, Bdub22 said:

RSR made it seem like he was given the cold shoulder and today that was completely proven to be not true.

To be fair... what was proven? Two people said opposing things.  Each of them has a financial incentive in their own narrative being true. So how do you decide who to believe? 

Now, Randazzo / PMDG have been around a bit longer than this current team of sim designers, and they have quite a proven track record in the community.  The current sim designers on the other hand...

Point is, we don't know the full story. Likely we never will. But it seems odd to arbitrarily believe Jorge must be right and Randazzo must be wrong.  Things are rarely that black and white...

[wiler 394]

11 minutes ago, Stearmandriver said:

To be fair... what was proven? Two people said opposing things.  Each of them has a financial incentive in their own narrative being true. So how do you decide who to believe? 

Now, Randazzo / PMDG have been around a bit longer than this current team of sim designers, and they have quite a proven track record in the community.  The current sim designers on the other hand...

Point is, we don't know the full story. Likely we never will. But it seems odd to arbitrarily believe Jorge must be right and Randazzo must be wrong.  Things are rarely that black and white...

how come the other devs just get on w things without causing drama? Ive been in MSFS since 95 and Ive seen Randazzo acting all 25+ years. 

[JSmith2112 317]

1 minute ago, wiler said:

how come the other devs just get on w things without causing drama? Ive been in MSFS since 95 and Ive seen Randazzo acting all 25+ years. 

So it seems Iceman from FBW was right about the drama.

[abrams_tank 7,476]

4 minutes ago, JSmith2112 said:

So it seems Iceman from FBW was right about the drama.

The FBW team is amazing.  They were able to do things with the MSFS SDK before other 3rd party devs were able to do it.  

[Dominique_K 10,152]

29 minutes ago, Stearmandriver said:

To be fair... what was proven? Two people said opposing things.  Each of them has a financial incentive in their own narrative being true. So how do you decide who to believe? 

Now, Randazzo / PMDG have been around a bit longer than this current team of sim designers, and they have quite a proven track record in the community.  The current sim designers on the other hand...

Point is, we don't know the full story. Likely we never will. But it seems odd to arbitrarily believe Jorge must be right and Randazzo must be wrong.  Things are rarely that black and white...

I couldn’t agree more specially knowing  Neumann is not adverse to embellish the reality as we have learned to know.

[Stearmandriver 2,333]

37 minutes ago, wiler said:

how come the other devs just get on w things without causing drama? Ive been in MSFS since 95 and Ive seen Randazzo acting all 25+ years. 

Yes but... you've also seen PMDG do things no one else was doing.  They still are, by trying to stick with the multi-platform concept this sim is attempting to leverage. The other devs aren't supporting Xbox right? 

Might have something to do with it. 

[GSalden 4,701]

For everybodies sake : hopefully the SDK/Simconnect will be widely enhanced this year so PMDG, FsLabs , Prosim, FBS and others can make (semi) study level planes …..

Edited January 27, 2022 by GSalden

[leprechaunlive 1,861]

11 minutes ago, Stearmandriver said:

Yes but... you've also seen PMDG do things no one else was doing.  They still are, by trying to stick with the multi-platform concept this sim is attempting to leverage. The other devs aren't supporting Xbox right? 

Might have something to do with it. 

 

hmm? There are MANY 3rd party planes available for Xbox.