Anybody tried this:

https://secure.simmarket.com/sim-federation-embraer-phenom-300e-msfs.phtml

Interesting.  Looks almost the same as the one originally posted near the release of MSFS - by the same guy who did the Kitfox and C90 King air.

Would love to see an older 300 (non E) with G1000 NXi.  

Is the avionics in this a G3X or G3000?

Looks like the default G3000 - can it at least use the WT mod?

The whole cockpit looks cheap. Well, it's only 30 smackers.

Edited April 26, 20224 yr by Ricardo41

12 minutes ago, ryanbatc said:

Is the avionics in this a G3X or G3000?

G3000. This plane might be an all-time great. The WT G3000 is absolutely amazing, I fly the TBM all the time and you can really get some serious utility out of that airplane. To be able to do that with twin jet performance could be a world-beater.

10 minutes ago, Ricardo41 said:

Looks like the default G3000 - can it at least use the WT mod?

The whole cockpit looks cheap. Well, it's only 30 smackers.

Should take the WT mod, and it looks awesome to me!

Once WT has their G3000 refresh (not the current mod as it uses the nasty default flight planning system) - I might give this a go.

The C700 is faster than the E55P so I'll probably stick with that for now unless one of you gents says this addon is amazing lol.

It's a Phenom exterior with default NAV & CJ4 flight model. LOL

Why do simmers keep falling for this stuff?

4 minutes ago, DJJose said:

It's a Phenom exterior with default NAV & CJ4 flight model. LOL

Why do simmers keep falling for this stuff?

Did you get it haha?  I'm just wondering - as there is hardly any details about it - oh I see where it tells you it has the CJ4 flight model hehe.

Hard pass!

4 minutes ago, ryanbatc said:

Did you get it haha?

Hell NO!

Addon developers need to stop releasing this word not allowed.

Default avionics, sound aliased from who knows where, cessna flight model, the whole word not allowed and crapoodle.

Triple extra hard pass.

19 minutes ago, ryanbatc said:

\

You know what I'm looking forward to. 😀

I'm going to be a contrarian here. I think the plane looks awesome. I like it way more than the CJ4. And I looked at their performance, give or take a few percentage points here or there they are about the same (Phenom has better takeoff performance, range is pretty much the same, speed and top altitude the same, CJ4 has better landing performance). And have you guys flown the G3000 by WT? Sorry, but it is absolutely AWESOME in it's current form.

This is one of the toughest RNAV approaches I've found; the WT G3000 flew it like a dream (after I manually programmed the VNAV, which to me is a blast to do).
 

 

18 minutes ago, ryanbatc said:

Did you get it haha?  I'm just wondering - as there is hardly any details about it - oh I see where it tells you it has the CJ4 flight model hehe.

Hard pass!

That quote is actually directly from the product page.

 

Features:

- Highly detailed model with full cabin and working exit/door

- Standard Asobo G3000 navigation system

- VR ready

- CJ4 flight model

 

No judgment here, I'm waiting for some reviews - if everything works ok and it's decent eye candy I'll put it in my hangar.

51 minutes ago, DJJose said:

It's a Phenom exterior with default NAV & CJ4 flight model. LOL

Why do simmers keep falling for this stuff?

Desperation for a specific aircraft model they want... 😶

Ehhh...buy this one or just keep my "Carenado FSX Port Over Phenom"?🤔

Edited April 26, 20224 yr by blueshark747