June 2, 20224 yr 10 hours ago, mac44 said: found the option but what do you mean elevator authority down to 50%? (my options default to -2 or +2(default is 0)? Sorry, I meant set it 50% of the way between it's current (dead centre) position, and the far left of the scale. 👍 Bill 😎FS2024 • Currently in 'GA mode' : A2A Comanche 2024 & Aerostar • Black Square C208, Bonanzas, Barons, TBM850, Dukes • COWS DA40 & DA42 • Bluesky Grumman AA5 • FSW Legacy, C24R Sierra & C414 • Echo Falco F8L • FFX HJET, Visionjet and P180 2024 • Got Friends A32 Vixxen • FSReborn Sirius TL3000, Sting S4 and Piper M500 • Flyboy Rans S6S • Skyward DA50RG • SWS Zenith CH701, RV-8, RV-10, RV-14, PC12 • Milviz C310R • Air Foil Labs Bristell B23 TrackIR • BeyondATC • PMS GTN Payware • RealTurb • Axis & Ohs • FS Realistic Pro9800X3D • RTX 3080 • 64GB DDR5-6000Former PPL IR, grounded by diabetes. Now UK NPPL(M)
June 2, 20224 yr Author 11 hours ago, Alvega said: Lol, of course I pressed VNAV in the AP. I believe the problem is with the default Asobo G3000 the plane uses (as Matt from WT told me), and not with the plane itself. Let's see what comes up tomorrow, That seems contradictory. There is a default Asobo G3000 in MSFS and then a separate WT G3000 mod. The Hjet is using the WT G3000 (mod) integrated into the Hjet model itself. That is significantly improved over the default Asobo G3000. And there is no need to load the separate WT G3000 mod when flying the Hjet, and there is no conflict in the Hjet if that separate WT G3000 mod is active in the Community folder. That straight from Matt, possibly earlier in this topic. There is a significant difference between the "default" Asobo G3000 and the WT G3000 that is in the Hjet, and Marwan has with cooperation from WT done some enhancements to the WT G3000 in the Hjet. Matt? If you are browsing this topic would you please comment on this? Edited June 2, 20224 yr by fppilot Frank Patton Corsair 5000D Airflow Case; MSI B650 Tomahawk MOB; Ryzen 7 7800 X3D CPU; ASUS RTX 4080 Super; NZXT 360mm liquid cooler; Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 4800 MHz RAM; RMX850X Gold PSU;; ASUS VG289 4K 27" Display; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener. Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126 "I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere
June 2, 20224 yr 18 minutes ago, fppilot said: That seems contradictory. There is a default Asobo G3000 in MSFS and then a separate WT G3000 mod. The Hjet is using the WT G3000 (mod) integrated into the Hjet model itself. That is significantly improved over the default Asobo G3000. And there is no need to load the separate WT G3000 mod when flying the Hjet, and there is no conflict in the Hjet if that separate WT G3000 mod is active in the Community folder. That straight from Matt, possibly earlier in this topic. There is a significant difference between the "default" Asobo G3000 and the WT G3000 that is in the Hjet, and Marwan has with cooperation from WT done some enhancements to the WT G3000 in the Hjet. Matt? If you are browsing this topic would you please comment on this? I know, but from what Matt said I got the impression even the plane's modified G3000 still uses default AP and flighplanning. I think that part was not modified. But I may be wrong. This is what he said when I asked if there were visual approaches in the G3000 (because I couldn't find it in the plane's G3000): Quote The G3000 mods uses totally stock nav, flight planning, and AP The refresh, coming later this year, will use the next-gen nav stuff Edited June 2, 20224 yr by Alvega Alvega CPU: AMD 7800X3D | COOLER: Cooler Master MasterLiquid 240L Core ARGB | GPU: RTX 4070 TI Super 16GB OC | Mobo: ASUS TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI |RAM: 32 GB Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000MHz PC5-48000 2x16GB CL36 | SSDs: WD Black SN770 2TB NVMe SSD (WIN11), WD Black SN850X SSD 2 TB M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4 NVMe (MSFS), Crucial MX500 2TB (Other stuff) | CASE: Forgeon Arcanite ARGB Mesh Tower ATX White | Power Supply: Forgeon Bolt PSU 850W 80+ Gold Full Modular White
June 2, 20224 yr 18 hours ago, JYW said: For those not enjoying the over-sensitive pitch controls™ , when selecting the plane in MSFS, in the screen where you enter your custom registration etc, there are sliders at the bottom (wear and tear, etc). I found that pulling the elevator authority slider down to 50% helps this plane feel a little more stable in the pitch axis. This method also prevents you having to make changes to your actual controller sensitivies (which would affect all planes), and the elevator authority slider on that page resets after every plane / flight. Agree, most of this is just getting your controller to feel right. I have to adjust the sensitivity on every aircraft. For the H-Jet, I copied my Honeycomb profile from the WT CJ4. I have elevator at -65%, aileron at 0% and had zero issues on my quick test flight with pitch/roll. The Reactivity slider is good too, I have started to use that as well so will probably reduce that and bring up the sensitivity a bit on the elevator. I have a profile for every controller for every aircraft, I would guess most are using a default profile for everything which isn't going to work very well... Edited June 2, 20224 yr by Flic1 Eric i9-12900k, RTX 5070ti OC, 32GB ddr5 5600 RAM, 2TB 980 Pro SSD, Titan 240RX AIO, Samsung CRG90 49", Win 11
June 2, 20224 yr Author 30 minutes ago, Alvega said: I believe the problem is with the default Asobo G3000 the plane uses I got the impression even the plane's modified G3000 still uses default AP and flighplanning. OK. Now I understand what you originally intended. If you had been more specific with the first comment, as you have with the second, then as such I would not have commented. I understand that WT is working on the G3000 AP functions, much as they did with the G1000nxi, but it sounds like it will be some months out. Disappointed in that.... Frank Patton Corsair 5000D Airflow Case; MSI B650 Tomahawk MOB; Ryzen 7 7800 X3D CPU; ASUS RTX 4080 Super; NZXT 360mm liquid cooler; Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 4800 MHz RAM; RMX850X Gold PSU;; ASUS VG289 4K 27" Display; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener. Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126 "I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere
June 2, 20224 yr In fact, if I'm not completely mistaken, Marwan took the G3000 modified by WT as a base, forked that, and programmed his own VNAV mode. That is, the HJet should have a VNAV mode that ist better than the one implemented in the WT G3000(mod), which is the same as the one in the Asobo G3000.
June 2, 20224 yr 5 hours ago, Flic1 said: Agree, most of this is just getting your controller to feel right. I have to adjust the sensitivity on every aircraft. For the H-Jet, I copied my Honeycomb profile from the WT CJ4. I have elevator at -65%, aileron at 0% and had zero issues on my quick test flight with pitch/roll. The Reactivity slider is good too, I have started to use that as well so will probably reduce that and bring up the sensitivity a bit on the elevator. I have a profile for every controller for every aircraft, I would guess most are using a default profile for everything which isn't going to work very well... Thanks for the tip. I have not had to touch my Honeycomb profile since day one. I will make an exception for the HJet. Love this thing! Update: -65 works well. Thanks. Edited June 2, 20224 yr by DJJose MSFS
June 11, 20224 yr Does anyone have those spikes on Main thread/CoherentGTUIThread and Manipulators with H-Jet? I have this issue only with H-jet and not with any other aircraft thanks Intel Core i9-13900K | ASUS ROG STRIX GeForce RTX 4090 GAMING OC 24GB | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO | DDR5 64GB 6000-30 Trident Z5 RGB | Corsair ICUE H170i Elite Capellix RGB | Corsair 7000D Airflow ASUS ROG Thor Platinum II 1200 Watt | Samsung SSD 990 Pro NVMe M.2 2TB & 1TB | Alienware AW3423DW | Asus ROG Swift PG279Q 27" Gaming Monitor | VKB-Sim Gladiator Mk.II | Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant Airbus Edition
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.