1 hour ago, mjrhealth said:

Ese tipo nunca menciona haber volado uno real en ninguna parte de esa reseña. Es puramente una reseña de simulación.

I don't see a problem with that either, I'm tired of seeing videos of supposed real pilots raving about planes like the Fenix V1 and then over time it turned out that it didn't fly that well. I prefer the opinion of an honest hobbyist far before that of many other supposed pilots.

Edited October 23, 20241 yr by Aglos77

Those who like eyecandy should fly planes with lots of eyecandy. Those -like me- who rather love good system simulation should fly planes like Toliss. Those with deep pockets and superior PC'S can ask for both. If the  330 graphics are on par with the other Toliss planes, than that's ok with me and I will purchase this beauty today. 

Jos

3 hours ago, mjrhealth said:

That guy never mentions ever having flown a real one anywhere in that review. Purely a sim review.

Yes thats correct. I was refering to others feedbacks I saw from real Airbus pilots 😊

ToLiss Airbus users:

"OMG, THIS IS SO FRAMERATE FRIENDLY!!! 😍😍😍"

 

Also ToLiss Airbus users:

"THIS  SEAT IS JUST 1000 POLYS INSTEAD OF 10000! WHERE ARE MY 8K TEXTURES!? THIS IS 1980s STANDARD! FS2004 HAD BETTER GRAPHICS! UNACCEPTABLE!!!! 🤬🤬🤬"

12 hours ago, Aglos77 said:

I don't see a problem with that either, I'm tired of seeing videos of supposed real pilots raving about planes like the Fenix V1 and then over time it turned out that it didn't fly that well. I prefer the opinion of an honest hobbyist far before that of many other supposed pilots.

Didnt know i could speak is that, spanish.

From Q8Pilot now on Twitch

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2280092754

1 hour ago, mjrhealth said:

From Q8Pilot now on Twitch

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2280092754

Wait Q8 is back? last I heard he left YT and streaming all together.

58 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

Wait Q8 is back? last I heard he left YT and streaming all together.

And apparently he loves xplane and where its going.

54 minutes ago, mjrhealth said:

And apparently he loves xplane.

Well I never questioned that but I tough he quit for personal reasons. I just wondered why he left YT with no reasoning and was hoping he was ok. thats all.

Edited October 24, 20241 yr by JBDB-MD80

7 hours ago, mjrhealth said:

From Q8Pilot now on Twitch

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2280092754

I wish I would have known when he was live. I would have like to have been on there. I like his review of the aircraft and his honest opinion. However he made it clear that historically, this is how Toliss release their aircraft with systems as a priority in mind and he have high marks in that department.

Edited October 24, 20241 yr by BobFS88

One thing I want to say about how insanely accurate Toliss is

I always flare below 30 feet, about when the "30" callout end, from E170 to B747, A300 to A321, or any other classic to modern era jetliner in my hanger.

And always as so with Feelthere, Aerosoft, JARDesign, LR default A330s....

However that muscle memory causes me 2 heavy landing in a row with the brand new A330, even one with a jump.

Then when I check the SOP and FCTM, sure enough, Airbus recommended flare start at 40 feet!

And I just landed with that in mind, butter! (although I messed up the "2nd touchdown" part...still things to learn...)

BTW didn't feel that strongly with A346 which also recommend flare at 40... well, I'll check that out later...

18 hours ago, Bjoern said:

ToLiss Airbus users:

"OMG, THIS IS SO FRAMERATE FRIENDLY!!! 😍😍😍"

 

Also ToLiss Airbus users:

"THIS  SEAT IS JUST 1000 POLYS INSTEAD OF 10000! WHERE ARE MY 8K TEXTURES!? THIS IS 1980s STANDARD! FS2004 HAD BETTER GRAPHICS! UNACCEPTABLE!!!! 🤬🤬🤬"

the 320 neo panel and aircraft was awesome, I love it.

the 330 neo isnt as good in my opinion.  But this is xplane so a dev could release a plane with square wheels and people would think its the best thing ever. 

its as simple as that.

If users do not have an issue with the ToLiss graphics, then those users should have no issues with other xplane developers cutting back in the graphics department as well. Why spend an additional 3-6 months improving graphical fidelity if your project has great system simulation? Aren't new planes supposed to be taking advantage of what xplane is capable of graphically? I feel like the bar is being lowered.

As a home flight simmer, systems and graphics are both important for my immersion. This is why I invested in a 4090 GPU.

Edited October 24, 20241 yr by brinx

4 hours ago, fluffyflops said:

the 320 neo panel and aircraft was awesome, I love it.

the 330 neo isnt as good in my opinion.  But this is xplane so a dev could release a plane with square wheels and people would think its the best thing ever. 

its as simple as that.

Yes because most of users in XP care way more about acurate systems and flight behaviour than just nice textures. It’s as simple as that. When someone starts to value the look more I would question his motivation for why he uses a sim. Not saying the cockpit textures shouldn’t be improved but it really is a detail for now when we look at the plane as a whole.

Edited October 24, 20241 yr by Franz007

I guess you have to decide. A complex plane is going to be taxying the cpu, you add all those high res textures and you start getting a slide show, never seeing a pilot fly a plane from the wheel well.