April 2Apr 2 1 hour ago, RobJC said: But even if you just have 60Hz monitor, with 4x FG you can cut the actual frames down to 15. That should take a significant load off your GPU, or at least that is how I am thinking. If the newer FG works this way, maybe. The previous iterations became unstable as soon as the real frames drop below 30 which led to more artifacts and stuttering.
April 3Apr 3 7 hours ago, turbomax said: "the community" likes some irony from time to time, in light of the RTX 5090 (no extra value for VR users over a "lousy" RTX 4090) and leaks about the upcoming RTX 6090 😀 I might have to refinance my home to afford a 6090 lol | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
April 3Apr 3 Author 2 hours ago, ryanbatc said: to afford a 6090 why, if a tiny piece of 28 MB software can achieve fps in the range of what only a RTX 5090 could do up to now. but pure fps alone is not everything. the question we have not yet answered though: is the lower DLSS--Enabler FrameGen quality noticeably more "fake" compared to the "genuine" fake NVidia DLSS frames? and are we prepared to sacrifice the real DLSS quality for a few thousand $$ more or less? mirror mirror on the wall, who produces the fakest frames after all? AMD 7800X3D, Windows 11, Gigabyte X670 AORUS Elite AX Motherboard, 64GB DDR5 G.SKILL Trident Z5 NEO RGB (AMD Expo), RTX 4090, Samsung 980 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD 2 TB PCIe 4.0, Samsung 980 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD 1 TB PCIe 4.0, 4K resolution 50" TV @60Hz, VR: Pimax Crystal Light + HP Reverb G2 @ 90 Hz, Honeycomb Bravo Throttle Quadrant, be quiet 1000W PSU, Noctua NH-U12S chromax.black air cooler. 60-130 fps. no CPU overclocking. very nice.
April 3Apr 3 10 hours ago, turbomax said: my "really" lousy TV monitor does only 60 Hz, but that's besides the point since I fly usually only in VR anyway where FrameGen doesn't exist at all. the news is "250 fps is now possible at 1080p" thanks to a tiny 28 MB "version.dll" piece of software. seems Jensen Huang was as amused as we are when he read this thread. Attention! "irony ahead". Jensen isn't able to supply the consumer GPU market because they make way too much money focusing on AI. But they also do not want to lose the gaming market, so throwing us bones like this just makes it harder for AMD and Intel to sell cards. This latest hack does not change that one bit. 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 96GB DDR5 | 4K G-Sync | Win11 Pro
April 3Apr 3 Happy with 30fps x 2 with FSR on my lousy 5090 😚 9950X3D - X870E Aorus Master- TUF 5090 OC - 64GB DDR5 - 1500W HXi - Titan 360 RX LCD - 9100 Pro x 2 - LG 45GX950A - HOTAS Warthog with Ava Base
April 3Apr 3 10 hours ago, RobJC said: But even if you just have 60Hz monitor, with 4x FG you can cut the actual frames down to 15. That should take a significant load off your GPU, or at least that is how I am thinking. True, but have you tried it ? Latency will skyrocket and causing massive stutters. AMD 7 7700X, 32GB DDR5, RTX 5060ti 16GB, 2 x Samsung 1TB NVMe, 1 x 4TB sata SSD, Windows 11 Prof
April 3Apr 3 8 hours ago, willy647 said: True, but have you tried it ? Latency will skyrocket and causing massive stutters. I tried 3x and 4x, and think 3x was very close to 2x, but 4x became stuttery. 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 96GB DDR5 | 4K G-Sync | Win11 Pro
April 3Apr 3 My lousy two 5090's can do 1000 FPS on my 2000Hz monitor ... and I still can't land the Balloon ... gotta be a hardware problem! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. - Carl Sagan
Create an account or sign in to comment