August 27Aug 27 22 minutes ago, Nandengo12 said:Interesting so 20 euro, and $19.95 on Marketplace. 20 euro is 3700 JPY and 20 bucks is 3185 JPY. For Japanese simmers this might be one of the cheapest TB products in years...I purchased on Simmarket $24.32 USD which was slightly higher as I don’t like using the Marketplace. Dani9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE (3x FG w/DLSS Enabler) / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber
August 27Aug 27 I quickly looked around the scenery and read a bunch of others reports by other users who purchased it. I should have waited for more feedback. This was my first Technobrain scenery. They're suppose to be the goto developer for scenery in Japan. I'm not going to let that happened again, lesson learned. Refund not allowed on SM. Dani9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE (3x FG w/DLSS Enabler) / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber
August 27Aug 27 Author 4 hours ago, Wise87 said:I quickly looked around the scenery and read a bunch of others reports by other users who purchased it. I should have waited for more feedback. This was my first Technobrain scenery. They're suppose to be the goto developer for scenery in Japan. I'm not going to let that happened again, lesson learned. Refund not allowed on SM.Their RJBB is excellent. I'm not sure what is going on with this RJTT release, especially given the development time. It's better than default, but does have issues.
August 28Aug 28 Author 8-minute user tour of the airfield uploaded to YT yesterday, this is a pretty good overview for anyone on the fencepreview Technobrain scenery RJTT Tokyo Intl Airport Edited August 28Aug 28 by Nandengo12
August 28Aug 28 Author 13 minutes ago, usernamerequired said:It doesn't look good tbh and textures look similar to the default airport.They do not. If you have been to the actual airport, you can see why they are more accurate than default. Also TB made a detailed platform for rwy 05, the default is just a modified terraforming polygon. The roads are a mess, new buildings on rwy 04 end are missing, ATCT is too large, etc. Several default issues, actually.The default also has little or no Japanese signage, which really destroys the immersion IMO... Edited August 28Aug 28 by Nandengo12
Friday at 03:02 PM5 days 14 hours ago, Nandengo12 said:8-minute user tour of the airfield uploaded to YT yesterday, this is a pretty good overview for anyone on the fencepreview Technobrain scenery RJTT Tokyo Intl AirportThe airport looks bad, really bad. This is a hard pass. Eric
Friday at 03:15 PM5 days Author 12 minutes ago, B777ER said:The airport looks bad, really bad. This is a hard pass.It isn't what we were expecting, but better than default, for those familiar with HND IRL...
Friday at 10:16 PM5 days Was there another developer working on Haneda, or am I confusing that with CDG?Then I'll have to grab it sooner or later - Haneda is a staple in my rotation.
Friday at 11:13 PM5 days Wasn't Axonos working on RJTT for MSFS-I know they've released theirs for XP12? MacBook Neo: A18 Pro with 6-core processor and 5-core graphics 8GB Unified Memory, macOS Tahoe, X-Plane 12 (12.40).Mac mini: M4 chip with 10 core processor, 10 core graphics, 16 GB Unified Memory, 256GB SSD, macOS Tahoe, X-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55).Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX9: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 32GB DDR5-4800 RAM, 1TB Micron NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8 GB GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 16EU iGPU, Windows 11 Home, MSFS 2024 and 2020, X-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55) and Lenovo LOQ 15 15IAX9: Intel Core i5-12450HX, 24GB DDR5-4800 RAM, 1TB Solidigm NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 4GB GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 16EU iGPU, Windows 11 Home, MSFS 2024 and 2020, X-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55).Alienware m15 R7: Intel Core i7-12700H, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB, Windows 11 Home, MSFS 2024 and 2020, X-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55).
Saturday at 05:33 AM5 days On 8/8/2026 at 9:23 PM, Keirtt said:The second I see those stock/generic default planes in marketing material, I immediately lose confidence. 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️ Edited Saturday at 05:35 AM5 days by Keirtt Gaming rig Intel i9 13900k - NZXT Kraken Z73 cooler - ASUS Maximus Hero Z790 64GB Trident Z 6400MHz DDR5 - Gigabyte 4090 GAMING OC 24G 10 x 120mm Lian Li UNI fans - Lian Li OD11XL Case - Corsair HX1500i PSU
Saturday at 06:18 AM5 days Author 33 minutes ago, Keirtt said:🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️Sorry, I don't know what you're talking about. You are implying it's not a good product? As I said, it has some things for the developer to improve on, but it's already much better than the Asobo RJTT as-is. Because I am very familiar with RJTT, I did some direct comparisons:Lots of navaids added in TB, missing from defaultThe T3 corner is way improved over the default, both ground markings and the new hotel all addedThe details on the runway 05 pier are fantastic. In Asobo it is just a terraform platform that looks very fakeThe detailing around the approach lighting and storm walls is also more realistic than Asobo. The Asobo approach light structures are the wrong color and shape as well. 34L blast pad pier is totally missing and the MRO ramp is too clean.ASR and road details on backside of MRO complex are excellent. Asobo doesn't have the radars and zero Japanese signage on road signs or road surfacesT2 in Asobo is missing some details, including the lattice framing around the walkway glass. TB version looks much more like IRL Edited Saturday at 06:21 AM5 days by Nandengo12
Saturday at 11:24 AM4 days 4 hours ago, Nandengo12 said:Sorry, I don't know what you're talking about. You are implying it's not a good product? As I said, it has some things for the developer to improve on, but it's already much better than the Asobo RJTT as-is. Because I am very familiar with RJTT, I did some direct comparisons:🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️ Edited Saturday at 11:28 AM4 days by Keirtt Gaming rig Intel i9 13900k - NZXT Kraken Z73 cooler - ASUS Maximus Hero Z790 64GB Trident Z 6400MHz DDR5 - Gigabyte 4090 GAMING OC 24G 10 x 120mm Lian Li UNI fans - Lian Li OD11XL Case - Corsair HX1500i PSU
Saturday at 11:38 AM4 days Author 13 minutes ago, Keirtt said:🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️So you didn't even look at the comparison shots I provided? Comment on the direct comparisons first.BTW, how many times have any of those people posting been to RJTT? I have used it as a passenger about 20 times in the last 3 years, and know all 3 terminal areas and surroundings very well. Edited Saturday at 11:39 AM4 days by Nandengo12
Saturday at 11:46 AM4 days 3 minutes ago, Nandengo12 said:So you didn't even look at the comparison shots I provided?I did not 😂🤷♂️ Gaming rig Intel i9 13900k - NZXT Kraken Z73 cooler - ASUS Maximus Hero Z790 64GB Trident Z 6400MHz DDR5 - Gigabyte 4090 GAMING OC 24G 10 x 120mm Lian Li UNI fans - Lian Li OD11XL Case - Corsair HX1500i PSU
Create an account or sign in to comment