Jump to content

taguilo

Members
  • Content Count

    870
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

22 Neutral

About taguilo

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 06/25/1960

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

2,097 profile views
  1. Hi, Max ITT in this aircraft is 830, so that was a reasonable ITT value. Props RPMs must be left at max (1800) in all flight phases. Tomas
  2. Hi, Stunning work you've done so far! And by you words all these mods/additions you did sound as rather simple tasks. But trust me, developing a professional Proline21 system is WAY more complex than that. You still have TONS of work pending, if you really want to reach that level. And I'm not saying you can't do that with current MSFS tools, I'm pretty sure you could if you wish. But again, it will take much more than the time you've invested until today. Now, when you have all that code working and based on a fast/reliable/powerful platform as C++ is, having to start from scratch with new tools is not something that will make you feel comfortable, so to speak. Then, and following your example, why to invest a month rebuilding VNAV if you have it already working? And I could continue with the rest of aircraft systems. As a matter of fact, MSFS has taken the original FSX structure for almost all sections of an aircraft project. You still have panel.cfg, and lookup tables for the FDE (though outside an .air file), Simconnect, etc. Even gauges header file maintains much of FSX functionality. Then, if FSX (and P3D 32/64) brought full support for C++ dlls, lack of it in MSFS is a clear drawback, IMO. I may understand the reasons Asobo has to do what he did in terms of supporting XBOX platform, but truth is, most of biggest developers' aircraft rely on systems coded in C++ modules, and so it is very reasonable for they to complain as they are doing. Should they turn around and face the change? Probably, and even more, surely at one point. But the right to express their disconformity still applies. Tomas
  3. Yeah, of course would be awesome to put a PL21 aircraft in MSFS, but not at a cost of throwing hundreths of thousands code lines and starting from scratch, that will mean perhaps years of development time. That's Milviz vision today. May it prevail? perhaps. Change? perhaps too. IMO this uncertainty is what Colin referred about. Tomas
  4. Actually the default turboprop model is total or partially incorrect in all of the other popular simulators (FSX/P3D/XPLANE). However, there are close to real performing examples of PT6 (Milviz) and PW150 (Majestic) in P3D, that could be ported to 2020 in a - hopefully - near future, considering 2020 engine base parameters are similar. Time will say. Tom
  5. Hi,

    Could u guide me how to change engine data, step by step.

    I have CS L1011 and would like to improve things as rather cannot count on developer.

     

    BR

    Artur

  6. Hi, I flew same departure without any issues. More details in MV support forum. Tomas
  7. Hi, Change from IAS to MACH and vice versa is automatic around 20,000 ft; no matter you can manually switch it at any altitude when pressing the speed knob. Tomas
  8. Hi, Virtual Fly TQ6 works fine once properly configured. There is a TQ6 owner in MV support forum that explains how to do that. Tomas
  9. Hi, Point (1) is pilot’s operation. It has happened to other people as well. Please register on Milviz support forums so we can provide help on this and other known issues. Tomas
  10. Great landing! Thanks for sharing. Regards, Tomas
  11. Rob, Great video! Thanks for sharing. I noticed your left generator was offline. Ex-profeso perhaps? If not, my advises: - Always check the starter is in Off position before reseting the on side generator switch. - After engine starts (both), check both gen loadmeters; also voltage is ok on all buses. Regards, Tomas
  12. Hi guys, I understand some of you might feel dissapointed for the lack of detailed information on how different systems work. To be honest, except for those sections not replicable in a simulated environment, the documentation we would have posted would have been exactly the same as the real aircraft's one. As that was not possible because of copywright issues, we decided to prepare a set of different documents detailing as much as possible the most important sections : general setup - PL21 - FMS - etc. Unfortunately we couldn't finish them as fast as we had wished, and we apologize for that. We will start to post them in our support forum during the next weeks. Even some descriptive videos will be coming on the next days. Stay tuned!. Again, thanks for your patience.. Best regards Tomas Aguilo Milviz KA350i Team.
  13. It will also work just by operating the button on top of right horn. Holding down for 2 seconds displays the main checklist page. Pressing it will advance to the next line. Besides of course the up/down/enter esc keys, that will only operate the checklist while it is visible. When it is not, those keys resume their current mapping. Tomas
  14. Means nothing I agree, but at least would be something You are making assuptions on how the MV Porter performs on landing yet you never purchased the product, hence you couldn't make any valid comparison. And, being you a developer, you should know that visual model is not strictly related to flight characteristics. Again, second time, please be serious. Tom
  15. Thanks. I posted new ones in the original message. Tom
×
×
  • Create New...