lzamm

At the risk of offending some people, would those weights qualify as "dumb belles"?

Although I had dabbled in flight simulation before, FS9 was the first one I spent any serious time upon. I just loved the Dreamfleet 727 and criss-crossed the world with it, enjoying every second on the ground and in the air. I held on to FS9 for an unconscionable time even after FSX came out, mostly because of that model (the fact that my PC wasn't very good helped), but eventually made the jump, and then to X-plane and latterly MSFS. I still have FS9 installed on my old machine and occasionally give it (and the 727) a spin, but I find the lack of a proper virtual cockpit and the clunky controls off-putting and quickly return to the modern world. So yes, I miss FS9 - like I miss most of my beloved childhood memories, that are better off for remaining memories and not being revisited.

Have a shot at X-plane! Freeware heaven at the moment, too.

It has nothing to do with virtual or physical memory. It has to do with the way the program is compiled into its executable form. At the lowest level, each memory location is identified by an address that the processor has to store in a "register" in order to do things with it. At the time FSX was compiled, most processors had 32-bit registers and, like a calculator with a fixed number of digits, there is a limit to the largest number you can store in a 32-bit register - 2^32 (-1 for the purists) which is around 4 gigs. So 32-bit program can only access 4GB of RAM, physical or virtual. In addition Windows reserves around 1GB for its own use which is why you only have 3GB. Virtual memory lets the operating system play about with the physical memory allocated to any program. In terms of availability, it only improves things, not makes them worse. Without it, 32-bit programs could not run on 64-bit OS's - or at most they would all only see the first 4GB of physical memory and compete for that.

My bad, just checked and Plan-G does not have slew for X-plane, only FSX. Still recommend it though!

I believe Plan-G has an option "slew aircraft to here" when you right-click on the map, though I don't recall using it myself. Anyway, Plan-G is highly recommended as it provides much better mapping features than X-plane's internal map view.

There's a program called "aired" for editing MSFS .air files. It's in the library.

IIRC if you do not have CIVA installed the LNAV switch defaults to the standard NAV/GPS function. So temporarily renaming the CIVA folder (easier than editing the panel config) will let the Tinmouse follow the MSFS GPS. Been quite a time though so I may be wrong. Oh and you won't be able to play with the INS during the flight either Long time ago I wrote a small gauge that displays your FS flightplan with lat/lon coordinates to make data entry into CIVA easier; it also lists nearby VOR's for the same purpose. If you're interested I'll try and dig it up.

No. (1) I've got to finish this first, which may be never (2) Didn't buy another Carenado....

Yes, the feelThere Phenom has a working FLC mode. It also has CSC (Cruise speed control) and TCS (Touch Control Steering). I find the autopilot quite complete, only the VNV mode is a hard-wired three-degree descent rather than a path descent between waypoints. As you say, it has a FADEC which works as well. It's not as drop-dead gorgeous as the Carenado model, but I find the graphics adequate and for me the autopilot more than makes up for it. After all, its quite an old model (FS9 conversion?) and shows it with several 2D popups and a configurator which runs outside FSX. On the other hand it has a good manual with detailed system descriptions and a tutorial flight, which you can find online if you google "feelthere phenom manual". Also on the minus side the displays are less functional than the Carenado's, with no inset map or backup engine page on the PFD, no system synoptics, TAWS or weather radar on the MFD. While both FMS's are skins for the default FSX GPS, the Carenado lets you modify the flight plan (add or remove waypoints) while the feelThere does not. You can of course go DTO on both. Basically its swings and roundabouts, but I personally find the feelThere version more satisfying to fly, mostly because all the systems you really need work as expected. I'm working on and off on a replacement autopilot for the Carenado which would give the best of both worlds, but that's another story!

Sure you didn't activate the Alpha Floor high AOA protection mode? - it should have been indicated on in the FMA, top left of the PFD. You said you were slow on the approach. Alpha Floor engages TOGA regardless of thrust lever position and can only be turned off by turning off the autothrust system (which can then be turned on again).

Are you using the FSX default airport for Alghero? Because if so, the LOC frequency is 109.3 (go to the FSX map screen and check it out). No matter what your FMS database says, FSX will only tune in to what it "really" has. Solution is to get an updated afcad for the airport, in the meantime just tune it manually!

Here's how it was done at 160 knots.... https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=590981414282282

There will always be UFO's. However, be aware that once you know they're alien, they're no longer "unidentified".

You have to put "panel=GTN750" not "panel=panel.GTN750" in the aircraft.cfg for the aircraft to access the folder "panel.GTN750" (hope I've explained it well).