Bunchy

This reminds me of when Fenix burst onto the scene. That didn't end too badly now, did it? Stu

I did that once, but in all fairness I didn’t like the house and it was a massive spider

Not for Steam users, it doesn't revert. Mine stayed at 310.6

1.7.23 just released.

The only issue I have with FSHud, is that it strictly holds you to SID Star restrictions. So, for instance, if you depart EGBB RW15 on the CPT2Y SID, there is a 6000 ft restriction at Compton, which means you are held at 6000 ft for the inital 60 nm of the route, no way to request further climb. I'm sure there are many other SID's like this, where there is an altitude restriction way out from the field. BATC respects the SID and STARs but is more pragmatic with its ATC clearances.

For those with VPN's in the UK, switching to a country such as France before viewing Avsim gets around this issue too.

This is with FSLTL running, but my settings in fsltl are at 30 to 50% levels of the default settings, so there only about 10 or so extra parked aircraft on top of what it normally injects. I don't use BATC, so can't comment on that.

I can say that with the Fenix, Inibuilds Heathrow, Ultra settings without FG, I can get 35 to 40 FPs with a 12700 k and 4090 with 64GB of ram in 4K. Panning causes the frame time to increase beyond 33ms, thus causing stutters as the frame rate sinks below 30 fps, it then stabilises once you have finished panning. I lock my frame rate to 30 in sim

I think he runs a 4090 and dynamic fg is for 50 series? If that's the case, he can only guess about what it will bring.

I still get panning stutters with LODs of 100 and dynamic option set to 30 FPS. I lock frames to 30 and use DLSS x 2, as my monitor is only 60Hz. Without DLSS, I can comfortably attain 40+ FPS at Heathrow in the Fenix. So you can see, overall performance isn't an issue. When I pan, the FPS drops below 30 causing stutters. It seems to me that the sim isn't pre-caching according to the setting, Ultra, in my case. I'm running a 12700K with a 4090RTX. 4K. I keep going back to the fact that this issue was introduced during the SU2 beta and never fully fixed. The overall performance has got better through SU4 and so far SU5, but the panning stutters remain an issue. My settings are a mixture of ultra and high. When I reset graphics setting to default in the sim, the sim itself sets everything to ultra. So my specs aren't too bad if the sim is happy with ultra as a default!

Not so far, it hasn’t

I'm using a fuel factor of P30 in the Simbrief aircraft profile, which seems to overcome the discrepency between the 'actual' and Simbrief predicted burn. I also toned down elevator and aileron resonse to -0.4, it feels like it has more inertia now. After my initial disappointment, I've completed a couple of medium haul flights in the 5 hour range and I can live with it. No WASM crashes either, which I believe have been an issue in earlier releases. It's not PMDG or Fenix quality and should be priced lower in my opinion, unless they refine it overtime to become so. Stu

I take it you don't agree, Bigmack? I fly in real world too, ok, I'm not a line pilot but PPL. I have the same number of take offs as landings, my capabilities do not suck, I've always had enough fuel at arrival. My point was, that simbrief A350 profile and the a350 fuel burn seem way off. Is there a 'special' inibuilds a350 profile any one could point me to? Just my initial thoughts on the product, take 'em or leave 'em.

Just layed out 71 quid for this. First 10 hour flight ended with a flame out due to simbrief and aircraft fuel burn mismatch. Simbrief fuel burn prediction and actual fuel burn are way off. Aircraft responds to flight control input like a fighter jet, using control sensitivties as recommended. Poor first experience, not worth the price to me. Way behind Fenix and PMDG quality. Once bitten, twice shy.

I remember when Fenix were the new kids on the block...... that didn't work out too badly