Sam

CS 777 v. XX Maybe fsl 320

I Was absolutely not joking.. It never stops to amaze me that no one has realized that CS doesn't attempt to do an working simulation that flies decently or even works. The way the make their planes gives it absolutely no more value then some I TRIED TO USE A PROFANITY HERE - AREN'T I STUPID!ed fantasy plane. Which it is. No one sees it because its dressed up as an 777. So until people stop buying this junk, there will be absolutely no point to the developer to change its way of handling business. What if their sales some day required them to actually do something that has decent simulation and somewhat works out of the box and just isn't some fine looking model with no simulation. It doesn't simulate anything. It emulates at the best. So people, STOP giving them you 10$ or w/e the cost is as a signal to them that you are fed up with its business models.

Link??

Enlighten me

Yikes the Universe 'awarded' me with one of my rare ctd's after my comment.. Never gonna participcate in this kind of threads again

Its funny cause im running a copy of Word Not Allowed's setting on 560Ti which means my frames are 22-24 I use MTX too with airline density at 30% and I have yet to experience an oom.. Includes lod at 6.5 That is flying the NGX from EHAM (aerosoft) to Uk2000 heathrow extreme.. I've heard rumors that AXE has an memory leak.. does it happen in other planes? Some say, he never gets out of memory errors all we know is that he is called THE STIG!!

The dx10 forum rob

Just keep an backup.. Add .bac or .old as file extensions on current effect files

Im guessing its the winter snow effect http://forum.avsim.net/topic/359138-winter-snow-effect/ Try changing season to summer or clear the weather and see if the effect persists.

Pretty sure the large amount of t7 requests had a sayin when the decided to make it, so to say that requests dosens matter isnt entirely true. Just hinting out that, it's plausible they have a saying, to make sure there is an market.

are you using wideviewaspect=true in your cfg

bad comparison really.. We have multiple screens of the T7, and I have yet to see one of the LVLD 757..

I guess the 'fix' is sliders to the left..

I agree at some point, but again refér to the thread I posted above. DShutt says in it that they are working on the 757, but their development cycle 'is painfully slow' because they work with it on an hobby basis. I, to some degree, doubt PMDG will be announcing any new non-classic projects before the 747 v2 is out anyway. Giving that this is probaly 2 years out. Im guessing they are waiting to see which platform will be the most mature to continue development for at that time.

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/367745-757/

Hmm im not sure bout that.. Stephen said that turbulence must be send to fsx standard engine. so I belive turning on dhm, and disabling all other effects then bump aircraft would give you the turbulence flex.. but im not sure if you can do it that way with ezdok..

I would suggest you go dx10. Ppl say it loads memory different GPu wise, so maybe you won't get ooms with it.. Read about dx10 in the forum. There is some trade-offs tho Are auto-gen set to sparse and what is your ai setting?

Haven't been able to find an 747 video with game audio that shows flaps movement, and I can't remember if I heard it.. Been uninstalled for some time..

There is? at 1:07

No Pmdg supplies an performance manager and the rest is done in the fmc pmdg menu, as you go

It doesn't necessarily show an failur.. Just do an maintance but it shouldn't be nessesary for every flight

Definately some maintenance problem.. Had the same, and it almost caused me an headache but then I maintenanced the plane and problem solved

Tjek your failures

The lightning on nr 4 is so real.. Looked at number 3 for 1 minute before I realized it wasn't a woman.. Lol Nice shots

Great.. Remember the foto of the tinfoil ball swirling ontop of the vent-valve as a topic here where someone (I think it was luke) asked, obv. for fun, if it would be modelled at some point in the ngx