Luis Vargas

http://steamspy.com/app/314160 wow!

Unfortunately there are not the twin towers any more but the graphics has been better every day. DTG is not all bad but it needs a differential that really impresses.

Sethos1988, I respect your opinion but the DTG Flight school will be the base of a new simulator to be released later this year. Being a continuation of FSX (stopped since 2008) in my opinion this is a very important release to flight simulation community especially for beginners. By the way, in 1988 I already was playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 3.0, hence my interest in the continued development (and improvment) of new simulators. My expectation is 'so close to Prepar3d' it will be. The comparison is inevitable and this was the reason I buy it and closely monitor improvements. We already have three updates which shows the will of the DTG to improve. "Excuse my bad English. I stopped speaking English since I retired 13 years ago."

Nothing more to say ? Too bad that a so important release (the reformulation of FSX base, that was stopped since 2008) has not generated more comments. Ok, let's hope to see if the next updates will improve the colors of textures (general) and add some shadows to others simobjects.

This happened before the recently released updates. Now trim and flaps are working very well.

Paraffin, I agree with you. I prefer the second picture bellow (more natural colors) than the first one.

After a update for 'french version' the trim and flaps began to function properly. I think there were more hidden fixes in this update. Let's forget. What matters is that it was good now. Let's fly and explore this new SIM.

I give up. I will wait for some update to return to this SIM. I am tired of fighting with the trim and flaps all the time. The flight dynamics are horrible.

I have to agree.

Some real pilots overhere to talk about the flight dinamics? It is been hard to land with flaps!

I do not know if I liked it. The color (gama) was horrible but It served to kill the curiosity of what is to come later in the year (the new Flight Simulator).

It was already downloaded (almost four hours) and locked since two days ago. Now I am having to wait for over an hour (and twenty one minutes) to bring it to life.

Hi, any news about installing REX4 Texture Direct HD (stand alone) and REX Soft Clouds (stand alone) into Prepar3d v3?

Many of the scenarios at TB are also published in several blogs on the Internet. The greatest loss were the posts with tips and tutorials.

I don't know what happened but now I can follow the tutorial correctly. Everthing is ok with the tutorial. It's a good tutorial. I advise to observe it carefully and take notes about the many important things that are explained before try to follow by yourself the entire flight plan shown. In the screnshot bellow I was doing the ARC DME that starts at NUBUK.

I am trying to master this tutorial but I'm doing something wrong because the Flight Plan programmed onto FMS coupled with GPS is being followed but the DME arc not.

Working fine. Better than FSX on the same PC. http://www.prepar3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6315&t=116757

I am back with good news. See at http://www.prepar3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6315&t=116757

I have an old PC running Windows 10 64 bits for internet and download only. It has an Intel E6800 (3.33 Ghz) and uses the onboard video (G41 Express). I bought from an e-commerce site a Nvidia GTX750ti 1GB (DX11) and I plan try to install Prepar3d on it. I will return with good/bad news as soon as the video card arrive.

Oh, thank you! Of course I did a search about it, but it was not successful. I will do it.

Hi, I am going to uninstall 737NGX from Prepar3d v2.5 and install it again on Prepar3d v3.1. Will I need a new installer for v3.1? I am unsure in doing this.

No promotional video? +1 Luis Vargas

Same airport, weather, date and time (15:56:16) in both FSX-SE and Prepar3d v2.5. All shadows are turned on in P3Dv2 (ULTRA quality). In the FSX-SE I see on the ground ahead the shadows of the tail rudder and the front of the Boeing. I think this is apparently correct because the sun at that time is positioned behind the jet, but in Prepar3d v2.5 the shadows does not exist. In which simulator the shadows is correct?Same airport, weather, date and time (15:56:16) in both FSX-SE and Prepar3d v2.5. All shadows are turned on in P3Dv2 (ULTRA quality). In the FSX-SE I see on the ground ahead the shadows of the tail rudder and the front of the Boeing. I think this is apparently correct because the sun at that time is positioned behind the jet, but in Prepar3d v2.5 the shadows does not exist. In which simulator the shadows is correct? FSX-SE P3Dv2.5 Best regards!

Hi, Lude2Envy. My mobo GA-Z77M-D3H does not accept increments voltages. The most I can get is 4.2 Ghz with the standard voltage. My cooler is a Zalman CNPS10X Performa and my RAM is rated at 1333. It is a modest rig. The price of hardware in Brazil is to much expensive (U$ 1 = R$ 3).

I am not understanding. My posts are added but disappear some time later. Ok, I am going to try one more time. With moderate settings, the performance of 'PMDG 737NGX + P3Dv25' in my rig is not so good but it is not so bad. At ground on airports I get 18-20 fps and 22-25 fps in the air. I think this is enough to get by. I have REX4 HD as my only add-on. "i5 3570K OC 4.2Ghz, Nvidia GTX780 3GB, 8GB DDR3-1333 and 500GB HD SATA3 7200RPM."