severniae

As per the title, has the A340 been integrated with MCE yet? It works well on the A350!

Hi - just a couple of bugs I've noticed so far with the latest version.. 1. Instructions seem to override the previous comm event. For example I have auto reply turned on, so after takeoff we are handed off to departure frequency and the checkin gets cut off as there is another handoff straight away after the check in, so I hear the start of three different instructions and only the last one plays fully. 2. I fly Concorde, and usually I request a FL550 cruise and then set a 6K altitude variance so to allow for Concorde's block altitude clearance between 50000 & 60000 (cruise climb) - but in the planning screen I can select FL490 as the Maximum, and I can't request any higher in flight either. This used to work fine but seems to have changed... Thanks, James

have they resolved the issue with local dimming? On V1.36 they changed the way it works which makes dark scenes blurry unless it's turned down so far it almost isn't worth it.

Thanks! In the meantime, I found this in the settings file - If I edit this line to 6000 as shown below, will the application take heed of it, or is it a hard limit of the application? (I was just hoping that the 1000 foot limit was a UI limitation but not on the engine..? <AppSetng> <Name>AllowedAltVarianceFt</Name> <Value>6000</Value> <LastChanged>2024-12-19T13:16:31.1216021+00:00</LastChanged>

Here is an example from one of the Aircraft.cfg files: [FLTSIM.0] title="FSLabs A321-231 - British Airways (G-EUXL)" model="" panel= "BAW G-EUXL" sound="" texture="BAW G-EUXL" description=" Created by: FSLabs | Anthony Eyre" wip_indicator=2 ui_manufacturer="Airbus" ui_type="A321" ui_variation="British Airways (G-EUXL)" ui_typerole="Commercial Airliner" ui_createdby="FSLabs" ui_certified_ceiling=39000 ui_max_range=3500 ui_autonomy=7 ui_fuel_burn_rate=5300 atc_id="G-EUXL" atc_airline="Speedbird" atc_flight_number="321" atc_heavy=0 atc_parking_types="GATE,RAMP,CARGO" atc_parking_codes="BAW" isUserSelectable=1 isAirTraffic=0 canBeUsedByAITraffic=0 sim=A321 kb_checklists=AirbusA321_check kb_reference=AirbusA321_ref atc_model=A321 atc_type=Airbus sharklets=0 engine_variant=IAE2533A5 system_variant=EIS2 selcal_id=ACJL version=1 airline_iata_code=BA cruise_speed=477 icao_airline=BAW ui_powerplant_specifics=IAEV2533-A5 Engine ui_instrumentation=Wingtip Fences ui_thumbnailfile=Texture.FSL\thumbnail.jpg

Hi, I fly the Concorde in P3d. In the V2 I would set a altitude variation of 6000 and request FL 550, as concorde was assigned a block altitude between FL500&FL600. This allowed me to get to the block altitude and it do it's gradual 'Cruise Climb' without issue. In V3 I can select a MAX of 1000 feet variance. Is there either the option to have a block altitude, or add a greater altitude variance please? Thanks.. If there are any other suggestions to get good support for Concorde operations, please let me know. Thanks,

Just tried it, unfortunately I get the 'please restart from the menu ' error and MCE closes so it doesn't appear to work in basic mode?

Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately tried that already and still no joy 😞

Great news, will be giving it a go this weekend! Incidentally, did you see FSL have finally released their airbus. I used to use it with MCE back in P3d, hopefully an easy one to interface given it's hopefully the same thing in the back end?

Ah, no that's a different one. I'm referring to OpenXR Toolkit. That and the PimaxXR tool are made by the same person, and it seems something about the recent windows update broke it.

Are you using 'PimaxXR' (the opensource one from GitHub), or the one that comes pre-bundled with pimax play?

Let some Win 11 updates install earlier in the week, now neither of the above tools work any more - anyone else had the same?

Hi @FS++ I was just about to get the PMDG 777f that just released. Will it work with MCE without an update, or will you need to do something to make it work with MCE? Thanks!

Will the iFly Max-8 be supported?

Take a look at some benchmarks, but to be honest I wouldn't bother. You might see a percent or so worth of difference for the (rather high) cost.