Blackrat100

Great :smile: Got it working fine now thanks to AnkH's suggestion of clicking "prefer maximum performance" in the nVidia driver menu under "power management". Flyinside now running at 24/92 fps Thanks all.

Well, tried all that. No luck. I'm still getting poor fps, most annoying. With the GTX970 and Flyinside I was getting a usable 30/90 fps, now with the GTX1070 and new driver it's down to 20/12 fps. I'm hoping it's a new driver problem that'll be fixed soon.

Thanks for that. I had remembered to delete the shaders folder but not Prepar3D.cfg. I'll give it a go.

I do hope someone can point me in the right direction here. I've just upgraded from a GTX 970 to a GTX 1070 and my P3D frame rate has dropped considerably. Not what I was expecting at all. I removed my 970 and installed the 1070, completely removed the Nvidia drivers with Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) and clean installed 368.81. Everything went fine with Valley Benchmark showing a healthy increase in score from 1967 to 2890. Fine so far, until I ran P3D. Before the change at Orbx KPSP in a Lancair Legacy I was getting 42 fps. Running with the same settings with the 1070 I'm now getting 23 fps. My system is: 6700k, 32GB ram, MSI GTX1070 Gaming X, Win10 Home on an M2 SSD and P3D on a 500GB 840 EVO SSD. Thanks for your advise.

Well I'm not going to complain, drip, whine or moan about a product that's not even out yet. I think it looks great. If Rex can marry their textures and inject full weather systems into P3D then it'll be a certain buy for me. Well done Rex.

LOL I may well give up flight simulation for good. It's far more entertaining reading the comings, goings and speculation in threads like this. So many strong theories and opinions. I love it. Keep going. You guys are so, so funny, love you all so much. Thank you, it's brightened my day no end. :p0816:

If third party software HAS to have WIN9 to run correctly and checked for 'WIN9' it could possibly be confused by WIN95 or WIN98 if it only checked the first 4 characters. At least I think that is what was explained to me. I glazed over.

I agree Kevin, I think I'll hang on for the official version too.

Great shots Ryan. The A2A C182 and GTN750 is really a great combo.

Those were the days my friend We thought they'd never end We'd fly at Meigs forever and a day We'd fly the route we'd we choose We'd fly and never lose Those were the days, oh yes those were the days.

Most definitely P3D2. It's the way forward.

It's spelled 'WHINE'

Thanks Rafal, I'll stick with the A319 for the moment then.

Generally speaking I'm a bit of a low 'n' slow GA kind of pilot. I just love the A2A C172 & C182 flying above detailed ORBX scenery, but recently I've moved on to the Aerosoft Airbus A318/319. I'd never really enjoyed the tube liners before but these just won't let go. They keep me coming back for more. My question is: Is it worth forking out for the A320/321 as well as it's essentially the same aircraft only larger. Or am I wrong? Are there any/many differences in flying the bigger brothers? Thanks