Jump to content

PWJT8D

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    686

  • Donations

    $10.00 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PWJT8D

  1. PWJT8D
    Nothing scheduled at this time, but it is not uncommon for Delta to reposition or sub a 772 between ATL and DTW.
  2. PWJT8D
    Excited for this one! I'm anxious to see how in depth they are getting with the Aspen EFD1000.
  3. PWJT8D
    I don't think any of them do because they use SASL. The only aircraft that I know of that work with 64bit is the FlyJSim 727, JRollon Jetstream and his CRJ only from the .org.
  4. PWJT8D
    Carenado is basically mirroring the release order they had with FSX. The good news is that it seems they have caught up with the basic aircraft other then different variants of Cessna's or Piper's which I believe would become a bit redundant in the X-Plane market. We should begin to see them merge into the more advanced aircraft and hopefully they can crack into the complex avionics which is greatly needed in the X-Plane.
  5. PWJT8D
    Give it a try. As far as default aircraft go in the flight simulation world, this one is definitely one of the best (in the heavy category.) It flies really well and the eye candy is above what you would expect for default. It gets even more useful if you use an FMC plugin or AirTrack along with it.
  6. PWJT8D
    That airplane is gorgeous. Definitely on the buy list for me.
  7. PWJT8D
    Those large walls at the runway thresholds you can remove. Open the airport up in OverlayEditor and although you won't be able to see the objects, if you click around in the area they are eventually you will get lucky and they will highlight, allowing you to delete them.
  8. PWJT8D
    They may be using TrackIR in the videos as they say it is recommended for use with the A320. I can't be positive however as I do not own TrackIR.
  9. PWJT8D
    The ERJ for X-Plane is a different breed. It never was intended to be a full systems aircraft from the start. As why it is priced accordingly. What the developer wanted to do was to build an aircraft with nothing but default X-Plane systems. So with that, it is about as good as it gets in the world of no plug-ins or fancy code. It does have very good flight dynamics and the eye candy is definitely there. But if your expecting it to be comparable to Feelthere's, it won't be.
  10. PWJT8D
    This aircraft is fantastic! Another happy customer :biggrin:
  11. PWJT8D
    Usually a amber color is armed and green color is captured. The button by the altimeter is your barometric setting.
  12. PWJT8D
    I think the "ON" position is more of a simulation of the flight director being armed but not in use. As the default Cessna 172 autopilot does not have a vertical speed function am I correct? I believe you have to disconnect your ALT hold, fly to your desired altitude and then at that point, click the ALT button to hold that altitude.
  13. PWJT8D
    I think the Flight Director has to be toggled to auto
  14. PWJT8D
    Downloading now!
  15. PWJT8D
    I've never been able to get it to work with my friend as well. Maybe we weren't entering in the correct IP Address, I don't know which one to use but we tried all combinations. Possibly someone else could shed some light on this.
  16. PWJT8D
    I can't say for the 380 but the CRJ is one of the best performers. It is optimized to run on multiple cores. The 777 is also very easy on my frames, not quite as well as the CRJ but still good. One other aircraft you should look into is the Challenger 300. Great aircraft and fun to fly, however it is the one payware aircraft that I have that is hardest on FPS.
  17. PWJT8D
    As far as I know, the XPX AI program will not use the default x-plane AI aircraft. They will be coded as objects so you will be able to run as many AI aircraft (objects) as your computer can do, other then the up to twenty that x-plane allows at the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...