BrettT

Members
  • Content Count

    194
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

18 Neutral

About BrettT

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

716 profile views
  1. CPU peaked at 47 C? Either way interested to see how the tests progress and the performance within P3D
  2. Thanks Bob, The cost was one of the things that had me curious with regards to the 6850K.....i.e what makes it more expensive. When I originally purchased it the 6700K had not come out yet and I was wanting something more than 4 core anyways. I believe I bought it for about $600 USD on sale a couple years ago. That puts it more expensive than both the 8086K which has less L3 and the 9900K which has slightly more L3 and an extra 2 cores. Is it the PCI lanes? Just kind of thinking out loud. Of course it could be a quantity thing where it is more of a niche CPU with capabilities beyond some of the limitations of a mainstream CPU and thus not sold in the same quantities as the mainstream CPU and thus more expensive.
  3. I am considering doing a new system but am presently weighing my options. I presently have a 6850K @ 4.2 GHz 1080 GTX and am using it to run an HTC Vive. I am considering getting the RTX 2080 Ti, HTC Vive Pro and either 9900K or the 8086K. I am not in a rush. My system runs decent with locked frames at 30 and able to maintain that in all but the most difficult areas. In those areas it dips down to 20. I am using Fly Inside so though my simulator is operating at 30 FPS my video output is running at 90 FPS which makes for a smooth experience. What I am hoping to accomplish is to bolster the FPS in the difficult areas and be able to add in more dynamic lighting and shadows and to increase my overall resolution with the Vive Pro So the 3 processors in the discussion are: 6850K - 4.2 GHz - 6 Core - L3 15MB 8086K - 5.0 (?) GHz - 6 Core - L3 12MB 9900K - 5.0 (?) GHz - 8 Core - L3 16MB My main question is how important is the L3 cache with regards to overall performance (FPS, information handling, texture loading). With the 8086 I am giving up 3MB of L3, maintaining the same number of cores and gaining 0.8 GHz in speed. I have always suspected that the L3 cache had a subtle but noticeable impact but have nothing to back it up Interested in any thoughts Regards, Brett
  4. BrettT

    Questions on OrbX sales

    If you are interested in an excursion/area scenery then Pago Pago is good for some island flying and the two Papau New Guinea airports are great for some bush flying. All three of these come with a highly detailed main airport and a handful of moderately detailed strips
  5. Thanks for the insight David. I have a 1080 GTX right now and have been considering doing something similar. I have a 6850K at 4.2 GHz (so I could use a little boost there as well possibly). I use if with an HTC Vive and plan on getting the Vive Pro if there is a sale during the holidays. Good to know I wont be disappointed if I do pull the trigger.
  6. BrettT

    Best ORBX coverage for Vancouver area?

    If you are interested in add-on airports for the area there are also about 14 ORBX payware airports within 100nm of Vancouver and an additional 4-5 freeware ones as well provided by ORBX.
  7. BrettT

    A2A Bonanza revisited

    Greg, Not sure if this will help or not and I am certainly not looking to patronize you but I had experienced something similar to what you are describing when first working with this plane. What I had done was had used the ALT ARM feature to set a specific altitude on my initial climb and used the AP trim to adjust my rate of climb until the altitude was captured and the AP engaged the ALT mode at that altitude and held it there just fine. After navigating to my approach I then dialed in a new altitude and used the AP pitch down to adjust my rate of descent. The result was the AP was fighting me and would pitch down while I held the AP trim down button then when I released it would pitch up very aggressively and turn into a roller coaster. I actually had a couple flights like this until I realized my mistake The error on my part was after dialing in the new altitude I didn't press the ALT ARM button next to the dial. So the AP was still trying to maintain the original altitude instead of the approach altitude I was really wanting. So no matter how bad a I wanted to descend the AP was doing everything it could to return me back to the original altitude. Basically the AP was still in ALT hold mode. Hope this helps Kind Regards, Brett
  8. BrettT

    A2A Bonanza revisited

    I believe most of the initial hard pulls to the left were related to how loaded down the plane was and the timing of the rotate and how aggressive the rotate was. In using the A2A Bonanza I find if I gently pull back on the stick at about 80 kts I get a gentle lift off and straight and level climb. If I try to rotate sooner or pull back too hard then I get the strong left pull tendency
  9. BrettT

    A2A Bonanza in the A2A Store

    I am not really experiencing issues with the autopilot so much as I just really prefer the type on the comanche even if it is a "lesser" autopilot
  10. BrettT

    A2A Bonanza in the A2A Store

    The Bonanza is definitely a little more hands on than the Comanche. I find this more so during periods of transitions (speed, altitude, etc). I takes me longer to get it dialed in. Of course this could be attributed to experience as well. I definitely prefer the autopilot of the Comanche though. It may be a simpler autopilot but it is quick and easy to use (of course that could be experience related as well too)
  11. I have applied the same logic to taking the sim route as opposed to applying the funds towards a PPL. If I total the money I have spent on the sim (hardware/software/ad-ons) in the last few years and had applied all of it towards a PPL, I would likely have my PPL. But, I would have only had about 40 hrs of enjoyment with all of that being in something along the lines of Cessna 172 and all of that time in flat and featureless South Louisiana. Instead, I have been able to have well over a 1000 hrs of enjoyment, flying everything from an A2A C172 to a Majestic D8-Q400 to a UH-1H Huey (DCS) in areas all over the world, many of which I will likely never see. I am not taking anything away from those that have decided to take the opposite approach in choosing their PPL over sim....I think it is a wonderful endeavor and perhaps one I will pursue again once the kids are out of the house. From a dollar/hour of enjoyment metric, I am very pleased with my choice (especially once adopting into the VR experience)
  12. BrettT

    A2A Accu-Sim Mustangs for P3Dv4 now out!

    Ron, Care to embellish. Are you saying it is better than you expected?
  13. BrettT

    A2A Accu-Sim Mustangs for P3Dv4 now out!

    Seems like the difference in features is the Civilian has an internal light and dynamic lights and they both take advantage of P3D's material properties. The original FSX version already allows some 3rd party GPS systems to be integrated. I guess the most important thing is that they are now officially P3D and thus should work as intended and not forced into the program
  14. I had one of these units a few years ago. Experienced similar problems as you have. Ended up trading it in for one of their other display units (can't remember the model) and had similar problems. Basically, the display on the unit would intermittently freeze up or it would stop being recognized by the system. I tried a few different USB hubs (all powered), plugged into different ports, etc...you get the idea. The one thing I did find was that the frequency of the unit freezing would increase with the CPU overclock (which wasn't excessive). So the idea that it could be a power supply related issue probably has some merit. I was told by Go Flight that their units with the digital displays tended to be pretty sensitive to the power available to it. Ultimately, I was frustrated enough with them to just send them back.
  15. I believe we may have raced a few times. I really enjoyed the vette. I believe you may have been just winding down on iracing while I was spooling up. I haven't tried AC but it looks good. Haven't touched it since I got back into flight sims a few years ago. Either way future looks bright for hardware and I look forward to your take on the 2080Ti Kind Regards, Brett