Luis Hernandez

Knowing iniBuilds, the plane would be very heavy on FPS. That kills any immersion. My vote is for FBW.

Use ADE (Airport Design Editor). It works for anything between FS9 and P3Dv5.

Skipped cruise, jumped ahead to TOD and just marked them all as "Good"?

PF3 does interact with AI traffic (i.e., ATC speaks with them), but the traffic control is left to the base sim (either MSFS, P3D...or FS9👴). You may notice this while waiting for the plane before you to take off. It's not hard on FPS, but it's a bit limited regarding callsigns.

SoonTM

Another click-baity video 🥱 I didn't bother to watch it, but I did read the description. Definitely clickbait.

Thanks for admiting you necroed. Anyway, now Steam has a two-factor authentication, using your e-mail. I'm not sure if this is by default or if you have to opt-in.

Another P3D user here. While there have been some improvements regarding airliners in MSFS, the majority of them aren't there yet. Only 3 or 4 for me are good enough for my liking, and no one as complete as their P3D equivalents. With P3D, I have a lot of planes, and a lot more complete than their MSFS counterparts. Also, several of my favorite aircraft have yet to be released for MSFS! For sceneries, I prefer to fly to default/AFCAD airports. I was able to force v4/FSX default sceneries into v5; so I no longer have missing parking positions. If I'm not satisfied with the layout, there's almost always an AFCAD available to save the day, and GSX L2 to make sure jetways work properly. While I try to like MSFS, I end up going back to P3D for airliner ops. I feel better there. For GA, there are two things that spoiled me in MSFS: the freeware PMS50 GTN and the default G1000 simulations. Somehow the default FS9 GPS does not satisfy me. I purchased from him a couple of his sceneries (Argentina and Colombia). He doesn't have an actual storefront. All the transactions are made via Paypal. Somehow the Donate button allows him to sell without having to set up a merchant account? No excuse but, if he keeps on selling, he'll need to set up an actual online store. If we keep going to photoreal, there's this guy: I actually replaced FCScenery sceneries with Matthias' ones. Somehow they have better coverage, autogen and night lights. Now, if only I could make the ground to stop appearing grainy...

While thinking about going to a 5800X3D or not, I found there is a 5700X3D. Here in Argentina I can get the 5700X3D for $383 and the 5800X3D for $511. In Newegg USA, it would be $229 and $329, respectively (blame our taxes/tariffs and our location almost at the end of the world 😂). According this Frenchman, I'd be losing 4-6% performance in MSFS: It's in French, but the graph is very clear. Has anyone else tried the 5700X3D in MSFS in more real-usage conditions (ex. landing at KLAX)?

Well, this video sums it all. An X3D CPU is what I want: BUT I've seen another AM4 contender: 5700X3D. Now I don't know if I want to go to the 5700X3D or pay 30-35% more and get the 5800X3D, but that would be for another thread.

Thanks for confirming what was your issue. Is this a Windows setting or MSFS setting?

Are default airports better (regarding layout and parking positions) or are they as bad as in v5?

Hahahaha.... get a 2D panel in FS9 or FSX, comment out some lines in panel.cfg and you may get something close 😝

As Airbus as the A220 😂

FSUIPCTraffic Zapper may work for cases like this? I don't remember zapping aircraft air-to-air. You need a registered version of FSUIPC, but now it's free for FS9.