techman

IFR approaches are handled either via vectoring, which is indeed not 100 % working (but in 9 out of 10 flights), OR via the simbrief flightplan via a STAR. It will clear you for the arrival, giving step descends, and when reaching the Fix it will either start vectoring you to the runway or clears you direct to the FAF including the final approach clearance.

Well. Be number one on my ignored list. You are talking such a nonsense that it doesnt make any sense to read your posts in the future. Bye.

No, he is simply wrong and has no idea what he is talking about. American companies can do whatever they want hiding their company names and personal data of their employess, this is per sé a "problem" of the amercian laws and not European law. When they do business in Europe and are proceeding personal data of european citizens - then the GDPR regulations come into play. But this does not apply to a company name. That´s a total different law he is talking about and this does not apply to american companies. But of course the turbomax-guy knows everything and we all should listen to his advice. Amen.

You are just wrong. In any of your posts. Art 7 is regarding consent, not your credit card data. But hey - try again, kid.

I played it on release. And it was annoying, a slap in the face of every paying customer - especially regarding all the marketing that happened before. I actually played it and its ok now (while it still makes "plonk" when you hit the "water"). And BATC seems to sail the same boat.

You can. Just not over the website. And please - nowhere in the GDPR is stated that you have to able to do it over a portal or so. Please don´t spread false information. And I know the guys of SI, they are absolutely customer orientated - open a ticket and I guarantee that you will receive a very good solution.

I just want to report that FSHud does nothing with my fps, with the obvious exception when injecting traffic - this is basically the same fps drop i face when I use FSLTL without FSHud (90-5 fps or so).

3,5 years after release 🙂

The more I read about BATC and beta I am thinking that this will become the Cyberpunk2077 of Flight Simulation. Stellar marketing and nothing to deliver. The "You spoke, we listen"-Video and the poll said everything.

Well, vectoring in SI was working today pretty well. I had 3 flights (simbrief, IFR) and I was guided from gate to gate without a problem. It followed the STAR to the fix and then vectored me smoothly to final. All done with the fenix, so it may be a different experience for smaller or bigger airplanes. It has some burps regarding taxiways though - but thats a problem that probably only FSHud solves "somehow" at the moment by reading everyones scenery files and taking care of custom scenery.

No problem at all. I know its Beta and I am providing all infos in your forum and through tickets. This was more like a "status report".

But to be honest as long as FSHud gives me "Speed 250" at FL230 i think there is some more work to do 🙂 - this is the most annoying part right now. But I like being "in a queue" either on takeoff or on approach. Thats immersive, no question about that. But taxi is mostly correct - and have in mind that some custom airports are so badly developed that theres no chance to access their taxiways. I think both other competitors will have exactly the same challenges regarding this specific problem.

They all run into the same problems. Traffic is almost unmanageable, and computing vectors seems to be a challenge, while voice recongnition and speech creation seems to be solved.

FG on, DLSS on quality, 4K native -> Off we go. No problems. 4080/12900K/32GB

Erm... FSLTL runs in a special mode when FSHud is running. So click -> enter -> Runs.