March 6, 200818 yr Does it really. I've had this bird for a little over a year now and never noticed, where about's? Intel I7 12700KF / 32 GB Ram-3600mhz / Windows 11 - 64 bit / NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060TI / 32" Acer Monitor, Honeycomb alpha/bravo, CH rudder pedals, Tobii 5, Buttkicker, Logitech radio panel.
March 7, 200818 yr What a poor host you are! I ALWAYS make coffee for the PAX. It keeps them out of the booze and peanuts! Hint: subpanel 2, last switch to the left. I can almost smell it brewing now.....
March 7, 200818 yr hahaha, ill try to straighten up lol. thanks for the hint, im going to check it out as we speak.Thanks again Intel I7 12700KF / 32 GB Ram-3600mhz / Windows 11 - 64 bit / NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060TI / 32" Acer Monitor, Honeycomb alpha/bravo, CH rudder pedals, Tobii 5, Buttkicker, Logitech radio panel.
March 7, 200818 yr Great plane. One of the few I fly in VC.I had big problems with hot starts until I figured out to crack the levers from the VC. Then it worked great. In 2D panel mode it was completely hot start crazy. ???
March 7, 200818 yr That's odd, I don't remember having that problem, but this is one I don't use the 2D for at all, because the VC is so good.
March 7, 200818 yr >Great plane. One of the few I fly in VC.>I had big problems with hot starts until I figured out to>crack the levers from the VC. Then it worked great. In 2D>panel mode it was completely hot start crazy. ???>>I cycle all the levers on my CH quadrant and put them in the cold and dark position, especially the fuel levers. I then kill everything in the 172 and load the B200. This way I don't have hot starts.Jason JasonFAA CPL SEL MEL IR CFI-I MEI AGI
March 7, 200818 yr I thought I remembered reading that the Aeroworx B200 was a sugar coated sim, looks nice, but not much substance for the in-depth simmer. From the replies here though it appears I am thinking of something else. I might have to check this one out :Dedit: i just checked and it looks like I was remembering a review of the earlier version of the Aeroworx King Air. That one they said had some problems, the newer version gets rave reviews. I think I'll pick it up as I love turboprops for some reason.
March 7, 200818 yr >I thought I remembered reading that the Aeroworx B200 was a>sugar coated sim, looks nice, but not much substance for the>in-depth simmer. The B200 is no more so than MSFS itself. Whatever can be done within the boundries of FS limitations B200 is IMO 95% there. It's not just a coat of sugar, it's sweet all the way to its core.Jason JasonFAA CPL SEL MEL IR CFI-I MEI AGI
March 7, 200818 yr The B200 'lacks depth' in that the gps is basically a kln90b reskin of the default garmin. Other than that it's got all the depth a turboprop driver could want, plus a maintenance/failure module unlike any other.Hardest airplane I ever learned to taxi and land - unlike the docile heavy iron whales I'm used to the B200 will happily float away or bounce one's ego off the deck if not managed properly :)regards,Mark Regards, Mark
March 7, 200818 yr >The B200 'lacks depth' in that the gps is basically a kln90b>reskin of the default garmin. The Kln90b is indeed its weakest point. That's why it's nothing more than a bitmap sitting under a RealityXP 530 in my VC.Jason JasonFAA CPL SEL MEL IR CFI-I MEI AGI
March 7, 200818 yr Author >I thought I remembered reading that the Aeroworx B200 was a>sugar coated sim, looks nice, but not much substance for the>in-depth simmer. From the replies here though it appears I am>thinking of something else. I might have to check this one>out :D>>edit: i just checked and it looks like I was remembering a>review of the earlier version of the Aeroworx King Air. That>one they said had some problems, the newer version gets rave>reviews. I think I'll pick it up as I love turboprops for>some reason.--------------------------------I am having a ball with it. I am so GLAD that I had a moment to read up on it. It may have been out a while, but for me, it is like it was just released yesterday! :)Exploring...and having fun.....
March 7, 200818 yr Author >The B200 'lacks depth' in that the gps is basically a kln90b>reskin of the default garmin. Other than that it's got all the>depth a turboprop driver could want, plus a>maintenance/failure module unlike any other.>>Hardest airplane I ever learned to taxi and land - unlike the>docile heavy iron whales I'm used to the B200 will happily>float away or bounce one's ego off the deck if not managed>properly :)>>regards,>Mark--------------------------------Oh yeah..., oh yeah...hand's up in affirmation... (having fun!)Mitch
March 8, 200818 yr Commercial Member Absolutely one of the best turboprops ever made for FS, I fly it all the time. Ryan MaziarzFor fastest support, please submit a ticket at http://support.precisionmanuals.com
March 8, 200818 yr And here is an appetiser. http://www.flightvideoproductions.com/kingair350.htm Dave Taylor
March 8, 200818 yr >>The B200 'lacks depth' in that the gps is basically a>kln90b>>reskin of the default garmin. >>The Kln90b is indeed its weakest point. That's why it's>nothing more than a bitmap sitting under a RealityXP 530 in my>VC.>>JasonYou can use the KLN90B from "Project Tupolev". By far the best rendition of that particular GPS.
Create an account or sign in to comment