Not that the FlyTampa version is bad, but time flies....READ HERE: http://www.flightbeam.net/news/I've just found that. If their decision on making also an FS9 version had been mentioned before, sorry (would mean I've missed it somehow).I am really glad, don't know about you, guys? :wink:PS: Can't wait to fly LH458 following this awesome video:

I wish I had a better A340-600 than the WIlco vol.2.But, well, is there anything we won't do to fulfill our little simdreams?

Yes, those are really good news for us, FS2004-maniacs. I wish FSDT would make the same decision about the upcoming KLAX.PS. Generally speaking, with the announcement of MF, I see no single reason to switch to FSX ever, since it's simply not cost beneficial.Long Live FS2004!!!

I'm still enjoying FlyTampa's version... :(

I'm still enjoying FlyTampa's version

Yes, so am I. :smile:I am even going to use it tonight to test this gorgeous freeware:http://www.blueskyscenery.com/LAS_North3West9_2M.html

That was really cool of flightbeam giving the fs9 version a shot, he could have easily skipped it. :( :(

That was really cool of flightbeam giving the fs9 version a shot, he could have easily skipped it. :( :(

Yes it was. It's good to see some companies stick around with FS9. I was at first really ashamed at FSDT with there decision to make LAX FSX only. Being a long time customer. Then I read on about how the files, texture resolution, blah blah blah. They didn't say the decision was final yet they just don't know how these new textures will look under the FS9 platform. So I completely understand. Good work Flightbeam. Justin

I wish FSDT would make the same decision about the upcoming KLAX.

I hope Umberto, if reading this thread, will write: Don't lose your hopes, guys

Thanks for this great info Rafal !I will be keeping a good eye on this :)

was going to buy the US Airports 1 Package from Aerosoft which has a bunch of FT airports, but really only wanted KSFOnow that this is going to be out soon, i guess it is worth it to wait. and especially if FSDT is not released for FS9, this makes a good alternate :)

Yes, so am I. :smile:I am even going to use it tonight to test this gorgeous freeware:http://www.blueskysc...h3West9_2M.html

How was it, Rafal? Was there a high frame rate hit using the Blueskyscenery?

How was it, Rafal? Was there a high frame rate hit using the Blueskyscenery?

No, not really. Actually I noticed no frame rate hit at all.The only problem is the texture load which sometimes takes some time, especially when changing views.But anyway a wonderful a so realistically looking scenery and all that for free. Gotfried is the guy!

Yes, so am I. :smile:I am even going to use it tonight to test this gorgeous freeware:http://www.blueskyscenery.com/LAS_North3West9_2M.html

Wow, they did my home area; Fresno, CA!!!Their work looks great!!

Not that the FlyTampa version is bad, but time flies....READ HERE: http://www.flightbeam.net/news/I've just found that. If their decision on making also an FS9 version had been mentioned before, sorry (would mean I've missed it somehow).I am really glad, don't know about you, guys? :(

I've been following that project for a few months now and it looks like these guys are doing a really nice job.I admit that when I first saw it, I though it was a FlyTampa product because the texture artwork looked very similar. Can't wait until its out.