December 25, 201114 yr Hello,Could I also get a copy of that gauge? I greatly appreciate it.Happy Holidays,Tom
December 25, 201114 yr Would also appreciate a copy of this gauge..!appreciate it.Happy Holidays,JBanyone that have latest and greatest version can send toBliksimpie at gmail dot com
December 26, 201114 yr Absolute brilliant. Much better. I also feel that the abrupt stopping was excessive.Now it is much more controlled. Thanks to all that was involved in creating and testing.Thanks also for sharing..!
December 28, 201114 yr BTW, PT6 simulation for the upcoming JetPROP turned out very well and as it's a free turbine engine without the need for an NTS system, the JetPROP decelerates very nicely at idle.Not as much as the 208 due to the greater blade angle of course, but very realistic, (without the need for a special gauge or invisible spoilers etc..)
December 28, 201114 yr BTW, PT6 simulation for the upcoming JetPROP turned out very well and as it's a free turbine engine without the need for an NTS system, the JetPROP decelerates very nicely at idle.Not as much as the 208 due to the greater blade angle of course, but very realistic, (without the need for a special gauge or invisible spoilers etc..)Very surprised to see someone from the development team comment on this, as it's a customer fixing the FD of a payware careneado aircraft. Maybe you guys over at Carenado should contact Tom and see if he can officially supply you guys with a published fix for the 208 that you guys can distribute as a patch. Tom seems to know quite a bit about specifics and I think he can be a good resource.JB Buzz313th
December 28, 201114 yr I'm working as a freelancer for Carenado and my first plane for them was the 337. I wasn't involved in the 208 development.BTW, I do have a few thousand hours on P&W turbo prop powered planes so it's not a case of lack of knowledge or resources.
December 28, 201114 yr Please don't take it as a critisism. Sorry. I just figured there are others that own the 208 and they might enjoy the fix especially if they aren't aware of this forum.Honestly, I'm really looking foreward to your next two aircraft, the TurboProp Malibu and the KingAir.Thanks for your contribution to this hobby.Oh and by the way... I own the 337 and the T-38 and they are both a blast to fly. The T-38, I think you did an amazing job, especially on the onset of the stall buffet. I don't think people realize how hard that plane is to fly in slow flight.A freind of mine used to fly the C model of the Eagle and is now transitioning to the F22, unfortunately the C is no longer, as they were finding hairline cracks in the bulkhead behind the avionics bay. Anyway, he said that the most challenging aircraft he ever flew was the T-38. He said, if you can master that in slow flight and landing that everything else was a breeze. Now he also mentioned that he had heard from the old guys, that the F104 was the most challenging aircraft to fly in the USAF history. Unfortunately, he came in way after it was decomissioned.JB Buzz313th
December 28, 201114 yr No problem and thanx for your kind words. :( If I find enough spare time I'll consider putting the 'new' engine into the 208, but I can't promise anything right now.
December 29, 201114 yr I'm working as a freelancer for Carenado and my first plane for them was the 337.....I didn't know that. That explains why the C337 is so good! I thought you just fiddled with them after they'd been released. The World is divided into two groups. Those who say "Give me a link" and those that provide the link. WWG1WGA
Create an account or sign in to comment