Hi,Check out this :(.. IMHO it beats everything we have seen yet for FSX including FTX ORBX (if you consider the integration of 3D Automation their technology)http://www.vfrnetwor...vfr-disponible/Greg

It looks good. I don't see any night pics.IMO it does NOT look better than ORBX, but it's certainly a step in the right direction. Much better than most sceneries, but certainly not ORBX.

Agree, not as good as Orbx but has promise. Some of the shots look like Condor scenery.

Very nice and dense autogen placement and beautiful colours on the photographic layer. Looking forward to that one. Thanks for the HU.

Hi,you are comparing landclass and photo sceneries. They are not better or worse. They are so different !

I don´t like photoscenery, looks so real that it almost becomes unreal, u know what I mean?! :(

I don´t like photoscenery, looks so real that it almost becomes unreal, u know what I mean?!

So you are afraid of heights? :(

Not really, my point is that it looks too perfect or polished, don´t know how to be more precise, it´s too unreal in all it´s Kodak Technicolor perfection, whatever!With ORBX everything else just becomes very, very ordinary, GEX too...Maybe even the real world! :(

Edited February 27, 201214 yr by Tor

On a par with France VFR and no doubt just a expensive, if not more so. Then there is Scenery Box for the whole of France which I think works out at something in the region of $2000 for the entire package.

I don´t like photoscenery, looks so real that it almost becomes unreal, u know what I mean?! :(

http://en.wikipedia..../Uncanny_valleyI'm not a big fan of photographic textures, but have to admit, autogen looks very good.

Edited February 27, 201214 yr by empeck

Thanks Greg,It looks as good as anything I have seen, I think, especially if it can render in 3D. Unfortunately I can not read or write in French, wish I could since I am a Canadien, so I don't know what it says. How large an area is it, and do they intend to strike outside of France? How much? etc.Kind regards,

Hi,you are comparing landclass and photo sceneries. They are not better or worse. They are so different !

In this case, these pics do look like photoscenery with AG, landclass, etc. It looks like a combination, hence the comparison to ORBX is certainly valid.

3d Photographic is the future scenery I guess, but still need sessional changes. Also, I think those pictures are a bit .... , because there is no way you can see that much far without a single blurry tile. I am wrong if there is a way to use 20k LOD.Lastly, as mentioned, it is quite expensive. I would never pay that much, while it is not better than Orbx..at least for now.

http://en.wikipedia..../Uncanny_valleyI'm not a big fan of photographic textures, but have to admit, autogen looks very good.

Thanks, good info!Hmmm...? Freud: "Das Unheimliche"

Stephan you should try the Google Translate plug-in. Sits up in my Firefox toolbar. Whenever I wish to translate a web page I just click the button and "bam" from whatever language into English.