November 10, 201213 yr The first test should be to do a flight with OpusFSX in an area with varied weather and take some screen shots showing what you believe to be the advantages of Opus. Second test is to do the same flight with AS2012 SP1 and historical weather set to the same time as the Opus flight. Screen shots to show differences between Active Sky and Opus. I suggest DWC, Prevent Cloud Redraws, Local Station Writes and an update interval of 10 minutes as well as a test with whatever your default settings are. Third test is the same flight with AS2012 SP2 when it's installed, historical weather for the same time as the Opus flight, with screen shots. Try both the above settings and your preferred settings, and experiment with any new settings in SP2. Need the best screen shots from SP2 along with the settings you used, and screen shots of the worst cloud depictions in SP2 for comparison. No one ever said testing was quick and easy. I don't have Opus or this is exactly what I'd be doing. Hook Thanks Hook, appreciated!
November 10, 201213 yr Moderator Great news, actually bought AS2012 earlier today in my quest to find the best wx engine for my use. Smart move!! Enjoy! Vic RIG#1 - I9 14900K MSI Pro z790 RTX 5070Ti 40" 4K Monitor 3840x2160
November 10, 201213 yr I am not that smart actually I just have some experience in listening to, and copying smart people. I am not too embarassed to say that I have copied Kostas addon setup almost to the T
November 10, 201213 yr Commercial Member Hi, For those who use our texture, I have added few shots here, SP2 are different from our rtm release. http://forum.avsim.n...0755-sp2-clouds http://forum.avsim.n...-clouds-part-ii Airports http://forum.avsim.n...61-sp2-airports Kind RegardsChris Willis
November 10, 201213 yr Wow guys, seems this is the era of wx engines... looking forward to try it out!
November 11, 201213 yr Those clouds look sweet Mr Willis. Im racing to get FSX re- installed to try sp2 out! Chris Howard
November 11, 201213 yr I am not too embarassed to say that I have copied Kostas addon setup almost to the T Yea, you copycat
November 11, 201213 yr For anyone interested, a little comparison. Both engines don't do overcast, and both now look very very similar. The streched cloud appearance is due to zoom 0.30, did that only to cover the bigger area. Opus does this: AS2012 SP2 does this: And this is how it should look:
November 11, 201213 yr Yea, you copycat Guilty Why mess with the rest when you can play with the best :)
November 11, 201213 yr Author Commercial Member In cloudy situation OpusFSX rendition still looks better to me. Dirk. If the METAR says BKN050, we tell FS to render a broken layer at 5000. There isn't much room for any weather engine to change that. If you are trying to promote the competitive product, that is not allowed here. If you have constructive comparisons in effort to improve AS, that is more than welcome. Thanks! Damian ClarkHiFi Simulation Technologies
November 11, 201213 yr Commercial Member For anyone interested, a little comparison. Both engines don't do overcast, and both now look very very similar. The streched cloud appearance is due to zoom 0.30, did that only to cover the bigger area. Opus does this... Word Not Allowed, do you have DetailClouds enbaled? This reminds me of the initial OVC depiction when I first installed P3D (and I'd forgotten to set it to depict detail clouds) Kostas Terzides ActiveSky developer Kostas Terzides
November 11, 201213 yr Commercial Member Kostas, Are you talking about this? http://forum.avsim.net/fsx_guide.pdf Yes, just checking incase you re-installed etc and forgot like the way it happened to me once. Another very simple question is then this: Can you depict OVC by setting it through the default FSX UI dialogs? And finally, was this an OVC metar indeed? Can you give me details (ICAO, date-time) so that I can check myself? I may have a possible explanation (it may be location related) Kostas Terzides ActiveSky developer Kostas Terzides
Create an account or sign in to comment