From what I understand, it's essentially like right clicking and adding three new view windows (or I think you can press ] to do similar).  So, the model (not sure if it's ext or not) is being loaded three times, which is what's causing the frame drop.

So what you're saying is that as soon as I get my hands on this thing I should immediately load up some very detailed, high end add-on JFK scenery, set everything to high detail, extremely dense, etc, and taxi around using these cameras and then immediately post on here complaining that I'm getting brutal fps…….

 

 

 

 

disclaimer: I'm kidding

 

 

 

So what you're saying is that as soon as I get my hands on this thing I should immediately load up some very detailed, high end add-on JFK scenery, set everything to high detail, extremely dense, etc, and taxi around using these cameras and then immediately post on here complaining that I'm getting brutal fps…….

 

 

 

 

disclaimer: I'm kidding

 

...and then ask when Service Pack 2 will be out.

 

(disclaimer: satire)

Thanks all! She's great!! Re' AAL; I'm on a long haul at the moment. KYLEEEEEEE.... 

 

 

LOL!!  :lol:  :lol: Dudes he's only messing 

Oh, some screenies from the flight so far!

 

 

 

 

 

do not (add up) during flight!

 

do not (add up) during flight!

 

 

First pic is clearly on the ground

Image

 

do not (add up) during flight!

Come on now.. clearly they're two different shots.. 

I want screenshots from every angle that is possible

 

 

do not (add up) during flight!

First pic - the way the elevators are sagging and rudder turned slightly indicates that the hydraulics are not pressurised, hence, airplane on the ground. The tail skid confirms that.

...and this is exactly what I was talking about.

 

Sophomorism at its finest.

...and this is exactly what I was talking about.

 

Sophomorism at its finest.

I ...almost... think that guy was trolling. Not entirely sure that's why I tried to reply in an informative manner.  I get what your saying though.

Next time he will show us an Airbus X Extended VC and the 737 NGX exterior. :ph34r:

Next time he will show us an Airbus X Extended VC and the 737 NGX exterior. :ph34r:

Come on! Even with MS Paint you could be more creative. The Aerosoft Forums keep Mathijs busy with people matching shots from random real Airbuses with the new A319 they're working on, while pointing and shouting "you missed this!".

 

Let's see, ECAM from a 777-200LR in the cockpit of the 300ER, with a tail from the NGX while running the APU? Kind of a "spot the mistake" challenge. :-)

Hahahahaha.... Sorry, that one made me giggle a little :-P

Gentlemen, chill out, I never intended to troll nor compare, but my comment was based on this line from EGLL77W post;

 

"Oh, some screenies from the flight so far!"

 

And if you have understood otherwise my apologies because english my second language and I took (flight) as flying only.

 

Thanks all! She's great!! Re' AAL; I'm on a long haul at the moment. KYLEEEEEEE.... 

 

 

LOL!!  :lol:  :lol: Dudes he's only messing 

Oh, some screenies from the flight so far!

 

 

 

 

I don't know about you, but taxiing, preflight, shutdown,... All part of the flight for me.

penta_a, on 11 Jun 2014 - 7:20 PM, said:

Gentlemen, chill out, I never intended to troll nor compare, but my comment was based on this line from EGLL77W post;

 

"Oh, some screenies from the flight so far!"

 

And if you have understood otherwise my apologies because english my second language and I took (flight) as flying only.

Perhaps it was a misinterpretation, but it did come across as accusatory. Generally a flight starts and ends at a gate of which a few minutes either side of the actual "flying" are on the ground. We would not say, "a few pics of the gate, taxi, take-off, climb, cruise, descent, approach, landing, taxi, gate. We just say "flight." That covers it all.