February 5, 201511 yr it kept warning terrain terrain pull up NOT too low terrain and NEVER too low gear OR too low flaps yes I did programme the FMC correctly, including the VREF I've had the same problem with the NGX quite a while ago. It had been fixed after re-installing it again. An other reason could be that the Navdata are corrupt for whatever reason. In such a case it might happen also with other PMDG birds (it's just guessing). Regards,Axel
February 7, 201511 yr Author yeah I did recall that the ngx Once suffered from a similar problem but how could the navdata be affected? perhaps its time to switch to the MD11 for the time being Kingston Chiu
February 7, 201511 yr but how could the navdata be affected? Navdata could be the source for the airport elevation and location... PMDG does not typically peek into bgl files but depends on navdata for lots of stuff. Dan Downs KCRP
February 7, 201511 yr perhaps its time to switch to the MD11 for the time being Great bird, but a steep learning curve for me. MD-11 seems to be a cross between Airbus and Boeing, way ahead of its time. Ric Elmore
February 8, 201511 yr Author by the way I already reinstalled the 777, so I'm really running out of solutions Kingston Chiu
February 8, 201511 yr Navdata could be the source for the airport elevation and location... PMDG does not typically peek into bgl files but depends on navdata for lots of stuff.EGPWS terrain warnings come from radio altitude and its internal terrain database. Neither of which are affected by Navdata. PMDG may be using the selected airfield elevation to "fine tune" terrain elevation calculations. Other than that I don't see why selecting the origin and destination airport in the FMC should have anything to do with preventing terrain warnings.
February 8, 201511 yr Commercial Member Other than that I don't see why selecting the origin and destination airport in the FMC should have anything to do with preventing terrain warnings. So if I descended into a random field in landing config I shouldn't get a warning? (That's a legitimate question - I was assuming the selection of a dest field suppressed the TOO LOW annunciations. Nothing to do with the nav data directly, elevation-wise. Just the airport location.) Kyle Rodgers
February 8, 201511 yr EGPWS terrain warnings come from radio altitude and its internal terrain database. Neither of which are affected by Navdata. I think you're correct. My original thinking was runway information (location, extended centerline etc) was involved but a quick search revealed that only inhibit is from landing configuration (gear down and flaps set for landing). A data error, if exists, would be in the .DEM files and everyone could reproduce the same false positive. You should be able to land in a corn field without GPWS warning as long as you have gear and flaps down and out. Dan Downs KCRP
February 8, 201511 yr Commercial Member You should be able to land in a corn field without GPWS warning as long as you have gear and flaps down and out. Ah, gotcha. Cool. That's what I get for not R'ing the FM. :ph34r: Other than that I don't see why selecting the origin and destination airport in the FMC should have anything to do with preventing terrain warnings. Disregard the earlier post. Thanks guys! Kyle Rodgers
February 8, 201511 yr The other day I was landing 30R at OMDB in the 300ER. Terrain calls all the way down the glideslope. Guess who forgot to set there altimeter at transition altitude. Just saying :ph34r: Doogie Reid My youtube channel for HD FSX Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/Doogiereid?feature=mhee Doogie Reid
February 10, 201511 yr yeah I did recall that the ngx Once suffered from a similar problem but how could the navdata be affected? perhaps its time to switch to the MD11 for the time being That's a longer story. I've build my own database by using purely the existent airport and runway data of FSX. Unfortunately I didn't sort it by LAT/LON but by ICAO. This caused obviously the same problem as the NGX wasn't able to sort out all environment variables (according to PMDG's helpdesk). I think it had to do with run-time problems which is no contradiction. However, I shouldn't have mentioned it as this was definitely a very special case. EDIT: I forgot to mention, that the data format wasn't the reason! Regards,Axel
February 12, 201511 yr Author The other day I was landing 30R at OMDB in the 300ER. Terrain calls all the way down the glideslope. Guess who forgot to set there altimeter at transition altitude. Just saying :ph34r: I am interested by this reply. may I ask how do u set the altimeter at transition altitude? Doogie Reid Kingston Chiu
February 12, 201511 yr Commercial Member For clarification: When descending, you change your altimeter from STD to local at Transition Level. Transition Altitude when ascending through the altitudes (local pressure). Transition Level when descending through the levels (STD pressure). I am interested by this reply.may I ask how do u set the altimeter at transition altitude? You just set your pressure setting (by rotating the knob on the display control panel - it's the one with STD in the center) to the local altimeter setting, and then press STD. I believe this is discussed in the tutorial. Kyle Rodgers
February 12, 201511 yr The other day I was landing 30R at OMDB in the 300ER. Terrain calls all the way down the glideslope. Guess who forgot to set there altimeter at transition altitude. Just saying :ph34r: I am interested by this reply. may I ask how do u set the altimeter at transition altitude? Doogie Reid See Kyle`s answer above. I was dealing with 2 noisy kids at the time so forgot to set the altimeter to local pressure which resulted in me being much lower than I should have been. Easy mistake to make if you get distracted on approach. Just glad its a sim lol Doogie My youtube channel for HD FSX Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/Doogiereid?feature=mhee Doogie Reid
February 12, 201511 yr Commercial Member I was dealing with 2 noisy kids at the time Sterile flight deck rules are serious business! Kyle Rodgers
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.