August 14, 201510 yr An amazing online flight planner,it'll even export in PMDG .RTE plus many others including Aerosoft Airbus files, does fuel calculations,programs SIDS and STARS too all for FREE http://onlineflightplanner.org/ ATP MEL,CFI,CFII,MEI. Type Ratings B-737, ERJ-190,ERJ-170
August 14, 201510 yr I will see your OnlineFlightPlanner, and raise you http://www.simbrief.com :smile:
August 14, 201510 yr Commercial Member Neither do MJC Q400 format. Steve Waite: Engineer at codelegend.com
August 14, 201510 yr Hi there, I just used the http://onlineflightplanner.org/ that works very well, as z06z33 wrote. it's a very nice flight planner. I made a plan from LPPT-LFPO. I see that the route does not go straight from arpt to artp. I compared with "Routefinder which is exactly the same. Now my question is; why does the route go far around on both plans? I thought to save fuel it should go straight. Do dispatchers in the real world do plans like that? Maybe because of some kind of constrains? Can someone shed some light here? Thanks in advance. johngoncalves
August 14, 201510 yr Thanks for the Link (s), I did not see that it can suggest SID and STAR, did I miss something ? One free solution for SID STAR is FS Commander. (the free trial version works 20-30 min and won't export) I like that FSC shows them on screen as route- easy to see and choose the one I want. cheers alf
August 14, 201510 yr A better solution for flight planning is to actually look at the real world charts. DJ
August 14, 201510 yr A better solution for flight planning is to actually look at the real world charts. DJ Exactly I use the charts in Navigraph Charts and manually plot my courses using Plan-G from the charts Matthew Kane I'm Dyslexic, what's an error to you is not to me
August 14, 201510 yr Commercial Member Hi there, I just used the http://onlineflightplanner.org/ that works very well, as z06z33 wrote. it's a very nice flight planner. I made a plan from LPPT-LFPO. I see that the route does not go straight from arpt to artp. I compared with "Routefinder which is exactly the same. Now my question is; why does the route go far around on both plans? I thought to save fuel it should go straight. Do dispatchers in the real world do plans like that? Maybe because of some kind of constrains? Can someone shed some light here? Thanks in advance. johngoncalves Just uncheck the SID and the STAR options and you should get a straighter route. SIDS/STARS are descriptions of routing that include waypoints as reference that are not overflied. To include those in the Flight Plan can take you miles off course. Steve Waite: Engineer at codelegend.com
August 14, 201510 yr Author A better solution for flight planning is to actually look at the real world charts. DJ I'm far to lazy for that lol. I basicly just want to hop in the plane load a .Rte file in the FMC. Push back,start up and blast off. If I'm flying in the real world I'll take the time to plan a flight out but I'm not gonna take the time to do it in a sim. ATP MEL,CFI,CFII,MEI. Type Ratings B-737, ERJ-190,ERJ-170
August 14, 201510 yr I'm far to lazy for that lol. I basicly just want to hop in the plane load a .Rte file in the FMC. Push back,start up and blast off. If I'm flying in the real world I'll take the time to plan a flight out but I'm not gonna take the time to do it in a sim. Just done a quick EGKK-LSGG route. No SIDs or STARs in the flight plan (nor departure or arrival runways, which the SIDs and STARSs depend on).
August 14, 201510 yr Just done a quick EGKK-LSGG route. No SIDs or STARs in the flight plan (nor departure or arrival runways, which the SIDs and STARSs depend on). OFP is not aware of the current weather and active runways. That is up to the PIC. Then fly your own SID and STAR.
August 17, 201510 yr OFP is not aware of the current weather and active runways. That is up to the PIC. Then fly your own SID and STAR. This is more based on the fact that the OP said the following: does fuel calculations,programs SIDS and STARS too
August 17, 201510 yr OFP DOES provide a SID and STAR. It just may not be an accurate data point based on the active runways, which are based on the local weather conditions none of which OFP has knowledge of.
August 17, 201510 yr So you're saying that the following plan (EGKK-LSGG) ID Frequency Track Distance (nm) Coordinates Name/Remarks EGKK - 0 0 N51°08'53.00" W000°11'25.00" LONDON GATWICK BOGNA - 184 27 N50°42'07.00" W000°15'06.00" BOGNA BENBO - 145 18 N50°27'05.00" E000°00'37.00" BENBO HAWKE - 145 6 N50°22'27.00" E000°05'25.00" HAWKE XAMAB - 145 12 N50°12'16.00" E000°15'53.00" XAMAB VEULE - 145 25 N49°51'24.00" E000°37'12.00" VEULE INPAX - 140 35 N49°24'29.00" E001°10'47.00" INPAX RESMI - 141 64 N48°34'07.00" E002°11'31.00" RESMI ODEBU - 134 24 N48°16'52.00" E002°37'34.00" ODEBU OGULO - 155 4 N48°13'06.00" E002°40'09.00" OGULO LUSAR - 131 138 N46°40'08.00" E005°10'46.00" LUSAR LSGG Would be read as "find a BOGNA SID and LUSAR STAR"?
August 17, 201510 yr Sure it would but it might not be the SID and STAR for the active runway. What runway is BOGNA for? What runway is LUSAR for?
Create an account or sign in to comment