July 30, 20178 yr For those who fly the 777-300ER, what profile do you guys use? I can't seem to find a Boeing 777-300ER profile for PFPX or TOPCAT at all. How is one suppose to use this plane then? ASUS ROG Maximus Hero XII ▪︎ Intel i9-10900K ▪︎ NVIDIA RTX 3090 FE ▪︎ 64GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro ▪︎ Windows 10 Pro (21H1) ▪︎ Samsung 970 EVO Pro 1TB NVME SSD (OS Drive) ▪︎ Samsung 860 EVO 2TB SATA SSD ▪︎ Seagate 4TB SATA HDD ▪︎ Corsair RMx 850W PSU
July 30, 20178 yr Hi, There is no profile in TOPCAT for the 777-300ER, I'm using TOPER for the takeoff performance, no perfect but good enough. For PFPX, I'm using this one: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/files/file/2819-pfpx-boeing-777-performance-profiles-pack-part-one/ But there are others. Romain Roux Avec l'avion, nous avons inventé la ligne droite. St Exupéry, Terre des hommes.
July 30, 20178 yr Here also: http://airlinerperformance.net/aircraft-types/ Wayne KlocknerUnited Virtual
July 30, 20178 yr Treat the 777-300ER as a heavier 777-200LR. Create a modified 777-200 airframe in TOPCAT with 777-300ER weights and limitations. It isn't perfect but it should be close enough for simulation purposes.
July 30, 20178 yr We used TOPCAT set for the -200F to come up with numbers for the -300ER. Have since gone to TOPER but it lacks the engine out engine obstacle feature. Six one half dozen other, neither is as hoped for. Dan Downs KCRP
September 21, 20178 yr We need a proper performance tool for the -300ER really. kityatyi I7 6700K 4.6 GHz, MSI Geforce GTX 1070 8GB GDDR5 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance 2666 MHz RAM, 750GB SSD, 1TB HDD
September 21, 20178 yr 5 hours ago, kityatyi said: We need a proper performance tool for the -300ER really. Its ridiculous how we don't have one yet.. Necmi Osman
September 21, 20178 yr 30 minutes ago, MadBilo said: Its ridiculous how we don't have one yet.. Necmi Osman And your point is? I'm sure PMDG would love to provide that data but they have to pay Boeing to release that information and I'm not sure Boeing was interested at any price. We actually need a proper performance calculator for all the Boeings we fly but it's not ridiculous that it doesn't exist. It is actually quite reasonable. Dan Downs KCRP
September 22, 20178 yr Commercial Member 6 hours ago, downscc said: And your point is? I'm sure PMDG would love to provide that data but they have to pay Boeing to release that information and I'm not sure Boeing was interested at any price. We actually need a proper performance calculator for all the Boeings we fly but it's not ridiculous that it doesn't exist. It is actually quite reasonable. I think he's referring to why other people haven't made one yet, or even added a -300ER profile to TOPCAT in the first place.
September 22, 20178 yr 22 hours ago, downscc said: And your point is? I'm sure PMDG would love to provide that data but they have to pay Boeing to release that information and I'm not sure Boeing was interested at any price. We actually need a proper performance calculator for all the Boeings we fly but it's not ridiculous that it doesn't exist. It is actually quite reasonable. What do you mean what is my point? I meant why doesn't TOPCAT have 777-300ER ? Didn't say anything regarding the PMDG company at all Necmi Osman
September 22, 20178 yr 15 hours ago, Milton Waddams said: I think he's referring to why other people haven't made one yet, or even added a -300ER profile to TOPCAT in the first place. Cheers mate. Necmi Osman
September 22, 20178 yr Commercial Member Because topcat is no longer supported. And even if it was the LR data in not anywhere close to what a real efb calculates Chris Makris PLEASE NOTE PMDG HAS DEPARTED AVSIM You can find us at http://forum.pmdg.com
July 27, 20205 yr On 9/22/2017 at 1:58 PM, Olympic260 said: And even if it was the LR data in not anywhere close to what a real efb calculates Good. By the way, is there an EFB in PMDG 777-300? No! So, as Mr kityatyi stated above: "We need a proper performance tool for the -300ER really." Yes, we need. Hamilton Müller
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.