46 minutes ago, Greek said:

The moment it is released, I want it to be the best flight simulator on the market, and I want the Pilatus PC-24 also.

 

Oooh that could be a real good type of mission/job, having to go get a patient. First take-off from the base where you're stationed at and then having to land on some rural unpaved strip and try to park as close to the patient as possible within a certain time frame. 

16 hours ago, SteveW said:

Not much of a stretch to put an eyepoint into a simulated train compartment and move that along with the train. Coming into the airport terminal is an exciting moment, if you can see some action taking place at the airport. With bush pilots demanding proper highways and road furniture with decent structure and vehicle movements. Another cut-scene would be sat in a driverless car approaching the airport from the road.

With the fully detailed simulator I think it would be missing a trick to not have the office filing cabinet next to a window where the action is taking place outside like in the Tower views.

Some very interesting ideas you have there. But I am not too sure if the devs have enough spare time to implement this because this is totally unrelated to flying. But I am sure some time in the future the msfs devs or some 3rd party devs can do this seeing that they already have the groundwork laid out for them with these insanely detailed cities. If implemented correctly, the immersion will be ground shattering.

Agreed. I've been talking about cut scenes could do with an upgrade since everything from wings to wheels have been mentioned.

I also said that the fully detailed sim would be required, That should be enough to assume no interference with the goals of the main sim right?

As I said a bit OTT, maybe, I would expect cut-scenes would be better implemented by addons, such as the career type of game. This facility is there right now in FSX.

- Runways looking different one from another even if there are made with the same material (new, used, dirty, dirty/new, dirty/used, multiple shades of grey...)

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.shutterstock.com%2Fimage-photo%2Fempty-runway-airport-rubber-friction-600w-694937080.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.shutterstock.com%2Fimage-photo%2Fempty-runway-airport-rubber-friction-stain-694937080&docid=km7vBNmu5lFDlM&tbnid=wWTjj6oRugUz_M%3A&vet=12ahUKEwjvudy_uYzkAhUCaVAKHdX-C_g4ZBAzKAQwBHoECAEQBQ..i&w=600&h=322&bih=944&biw=1920&q=dirty runway&ved=2ahUKEwjvudy_uYzkAhUCaVAKHdX-C_g4ZBAzKAQwBHoECAEQBQ&iact=mrc&uact=8

enhanced AI/ATC
 -using a method of "load balancing" on all active landing runways reducing or eliminating go-arounds.
Instead of using whatever runway is closest when an aircraft is within range, make it so there is an even flow of landing aircraft accross ALL active landing runways.

 -reduced airport traffic clutter: pausing outbound traffic waiting for takeoff so inbounds can cross the active runway reducing the amount of "timed out" aircraft. taking turns so to speak.  Appropriate ratio, not every other.  

 -realistic approaches: SIDs STARs  I observe O'hare airports traffic flow on flightradar24 when they have 3 simultaneous inbound runway use and would love to see that type of approach logic in this version.

Logitech/saitek Yoke, rudder, panel support.
 -I have over $600 of flight controls and panels, would like to use them please MS

23 minutes ago, Brandon0110 said:

enhanced AI/ATC
 -using a method of "load balancing" on all active landing runways reducing or eliminating go-arounds.
Instead of using whatever runway is closest when an aircraft is within range, make it so there is an even flow of landing aircraft accross ALL active landing runways.

 -reduced airport traffic clutter: pausing outbound traffic waiting for takeoff so inbounds can cross the active runway reducing the amount of "timed out" aircraft. taking turns so to speak.  Appropriate ratio, not every other.  

 -realistic approaches: SIDs STARs  I observe O'hare airports traffic flow on flightradar24 when they have 3 simultaneous inbound runway use and would love to see that type of approach logic in this version.

Logitech/saitek Yoke, rudder, panel support.
 -I have over $600 of flight controls and panels, would like to use them please MS

1) Welcome to how the real World works on APPROACH - you want a quiet Runway - go fly in Mongolia.

2) See Number 1.

3) "Realistic APPROACHES" are down to you and your Charts and filing correctly and monitoring ATIS/ ATC and being prepared to change on the fly when 10 clicks out on ILS. You want to change that then learn how to kill the AP and hand-fly a Visual - including a Circle-To-Land."

4) MS have already said they'll be supporting "Stick and Rudder" devices support.

 

Edited August 19, 20196 yr by Guest

7 minutes ago, ganter said:

1) Welcome to how the real World works on APPROACH - you want a quiet Runway - go fly in Mongolia.

2) See Number 1.

3) "Realistic APPROACHES" are down to you and your Charts and filing correctly and monitoring ATIS/ ATC and being prepared to change on the fly when 10 clicks out on ILS. You want to change that then learn how to kill the AP and hand-fly a Visual - including a Circle-To-Land."

4) MS have already said they'll be supporting "Stick and Rudder" devices support.

 

The biggest point is the go-arounds in FSX with heavy traffic.  the "real world" does not have that issue because of the way the runways are utilized. 

Do you like waiting inbound aircraft disappearing because they time out and cant cross a busy outbound active runway? I don't.  Its not realistic and something that should be looked into.

Yes, FSX currently supports my yolk and rudder pedals but NOT my 3 panels. 

14 hours ago, Brandon0110 said:

The biggest point is the go-arounds in FSX with heavy traffic.  the "real world" does not have that issue because of the way the runways are utilized. 

But traffic flow control at busy airports is extremely complex in the real world. Other than a very simple implementation, it would probably be way beyond the capabilities of a desktop sim.

What about mirages and similar effects? Rainbows fogbows light shafts have been mentioned?

21 hours ago, Brandon0110 said:

The biggest point is the go-arounds in FSX with heavy traffic.  the "real world" does not have that issue because of the way the runways are utilized. 

Do you like waiting inbound aircraft disappearing because they time out and cant cross a busy outbound active runway? I don't.  Its not realistic and something that should be looked into.

Yes, FSX currently supports my yolk and rudder pedals but NOT my 3 panels. 

Sorry Brandon - should have added at the end - try this:- https://flyawaysimulation.com/downloads/files/1645/fsx-aismooth/

It REALLY works on smoothing AI traffic and drastically reducing Go Arounds in FSX. I never tried it when I was running P3D so can't say if it works but I don't see why not - there's no 64bit gauges involved.

It's a must have if, like me, you're greedy with the traffic sliders coming in to Gatwick at 17:30 hours on a Friday night and like queuing up behind the Ryanairs, Speedbirds and Easys and every other Tom, Dick and Harry.

From the night lighting thread: it would look fantastic if the night lighting had some random ads coloring the landscape, especially in cities. Some blue, green, red lights in addition of the yellow and white from the default city ones. The intensity of each one shouldn t be the same to add immersion.

Also, a nice feature would be that night lighting in developped countrysides to be much more dynamic and bright than in an African countryside for example.

Garmin G3000! No blurry nonsense with limited features. Nice implementation. 

...to clarify what I meant by mirages: thinking more of the distortion of longer range views through heat rising over the runway.

I want:

Interactive cockpit

Good freeware add ons

Vatsim

Realistic everything 

Has anyone requested pilot controlled lighting? If not, I'll add it to the list. Pilot controlled lighting is one of those things I took for granted until I started working on my instrument rating.