May 22, 20215 yr Starts at 3PM GMT... (UK time)... Saturday May 22 If you click link, then you can 'set reminder' to go there when it starts broadcasting... 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.
May 22, 20215 yr He said it's "So much more powerful" and "Took off in half the time".. No, it looked standard to me as the Arrow III as it should. There should be no real difference until you start hitting high altitude. No sure who this guy is but those statements he made are absolutely false. Edited May 22, 20215 yr by styckx ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING / i9-9900k @ 4.7 all cores w/ NOCTUA NH-D15S / 2080ti / 32GB G.Skill 3200 RIPJAWS / 1TB Evo SSD / 500GB Evo SSD / 2x 3TB HDD / CORSAIR CRYSTAL 570X / IPSG 850W 80+ PLATINUM / Dual 4k Monitors
May 22, 20215 yr I'll pass. A Turbo Arrow without deicing equipment is useless especially with the way FS2020 does icing effects on aircraft in clouds. I remember using the modded Turbo G36 over the Canyon Lands/Grand Canyon areas of the Southwest and the range in altitude variations and cloud cover made for iced up windows trying to find/land at high altitude airfields (no other choice in some areas as the base altitude is 6,000ft plus to start and that's not even being in the mountains). I had to switch to the TBM for that type of flying. The Arrow would be far worse and slower. No thank you... FS2020 Alienware Aurora R11 10th Gen Intel Core i7 10700F - Windows 11 Home 32GB Ram NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB - Pimax Crystal Light VR
May 22, 20215 yr 36 minutes ago, Dillon said: I'll pass. A Turbo Arrow without deicing equipment is useless especially with the way FS2020 does icing effects on aircraft in clouds. I remember using the modded Turbo G36 over the Canyon Lands/Grand Canyon areas of the Southwest and the range in altitude variations and cloud cover made for iced up windows trying to find/land at high altitude airfields (no other choice in some areas as the base altitude is 6,000ft plus to start and that's not even being in the mountains). I had to switch to the TBM for that type of flying. The Arrow would be far worse and slower. No thank you... A litttle cheat I did. Go into your keyboard controls and bind "windshield deice" (or window. Forget exactly the name) to ctrl-i. Even planes with no real windshield deicing will now have it. Edited May 22, 20215 yr by styckx ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING / i9-9900k @ 4.7 all cores w/ NOCTUA NH-D15S / 2080ti / 32GB G.Skill 3200 RIPJAWS / 1TB Evo SSD / 500GB Evo SSD / 2x 3TB HDD / CORSAIR CRYSTAL 570X / IPSG 850W 80+ PLATINUM / Dual 4k Monitors
May 22, 20215 yr I would just wait for next week update before discarding this aircraft because of deicing https://fsprocedures.com Your home for all flight simulator related checklist.
May 22, 20215 yr The only difference I notice from the standard version is the tail section, and the performance seems to be the same at take off and cruising at low altitudes. System: I ASRock X670E | AMD 7800X3D | 64Gb DDR5 6000 | RTX 4090 | 2TB NVMe | Seasonic Vertex 1000W I LG Ultra Gear 34 UW I
May 22, 20215 yr I did not purchase the normally aspirated Arrow so I'll be getting this one. June will be expensive with that DC6 as well lol. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
May 22, 20215 yr 2 minutes ago, ryanbatcund said: I did not purchase the normally aspirated Arrow so I'll be getting this one. June will be expensive with that DC6 as well lol. You will be one of the few who this appeals to. It's literally a skin scratching climb of agony for the Arrow III to even reach an altitude that the turbo even comes into a factor. For me it's "Do I just risk stalling or settle for a lower altitude because this is literally becoming painful to ascend to the cruising altitude." Add too that what @Dillon mentioned about the plane naturally doesn't even have real deicing features. The market for this is very narrow to those who already bought the Arrow III. ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING / i9-9900k @ 4.7 all cores w/ NOCTUA NH-D15S / 2080ti / 32GB G.Skill 3200 RIPJAWS / 1TB Evo SSD / 500GB Evo SSD / 2x 3TB HDD / CORSAIR CRYSTAL 570X / IPSG 850W 80+ PLATINUM / Dual 4k Monitors
May 23, 20215 yr Just like in real life, it is only going to benefit really long legs or flying over very high terrain or at very high pressure altitudes. If you use the Arrow to potter around the Caribbean doing short coffee runs and the odd circuit at Juliana St Maarten the turbo will be a waste of time It will be useful for me on enough occasions to pick it up. For example on a recent trip from Vancouver up to Alaska the standard Arrow was really struggling to gain altitude over the mountains in central Canada and at 12,000 feet was barely climbing to clear the peaks. By all accounts by 10,000 feet the turbo should be kicking in. Even in PNG it could make a difference taking off on a very hot day. Though that depends on how the sim handles pressure altitude.
May 23, 20215 yr Beyond the speed differences and such, there is actually another reason to own the Turbo Arrow, and that is because it has different take off and landing characteristics owing to it having a T tail, which affects elevator authority at certain pitch angles. Alan Bradbury Check out my youtube flight sim videos: Here
May 24, 20215 yr Commercial Member On 5/22/2021 at 11:40 PM, Ixoye said: The only difference I notice from the standard version is the tail section, and the performance seems to be the same at take off and cruising at low altitudes. Here's a quick list of the differences from the standard version. Still might not be for you but worth pointing these out for others who might be interested. And of course remember if you already own the standard Arrow that we released back in March you can get 66% off this one. Two variants of the Arrow – Turbo Arrow III (conventional tail) and Turbo Arrow IV (T-tail). Other obvious exterior difference is the engine cowling, which houses the turbocharged TSIO-360, giving the aircraft a more sporty look (especially with the T-tail). Ten liveries (five per variant) Blue/grey cockpit colour scheme on the Turbo Arrow III, tan on the Turbo Arrow IV Cleaner, less worn cockpit to reflect private ownership (versus flying club ownership of Arrow III) Turbocharged engine sounds and some cockpit sounds (e.g. fuel pump) Differences in panel configuration – fuel primer pushbutton, two-position (high/low) fuel pump switch, engine instruments differ (EGT gauge, temperature and pressure indicators) Differences in flight dynamics due to heavier engine and T-tail characteristics High altitude performance of turbocharged engine – ideal for longer range flights with higher cruise altitudes, getting above weather and terrain etc Turbocharger overboost failure simulation, giving you something else to manage (optional, depending on maintenance option) Hope that helps.
May 24, 20215 yr This is a more informative video, actual pilot with several hundred hours in the Turbo Arrow IV: Edited May 24, 20215 yr by Glenn Fitzpatrick
May 24, 20215 yr On 5/22/2021 at 11:57 AM, styckx said: He said it's "So much more powerful" and "Took off in half the time".. No, it looked standard to me as the Arrow III as it should. There should be no real difference until you start hitting high altitude. No sure who this guy is but those statements he made are absolutely false. It's youtube...he had to throw atleast some "OMFG wow false hype" in there 🤣😂 Edited May 24, 20215 yr by blueshark747 Asus Maximus X Hero Z370/ Windows 10 MSI Gaming X 1080Ti (2100 mhz OC Watercooled) 8700k (4.7ghz OC Watercooled) 32GB DDR4 3000 Ram 500GB SAMSUNG 860 EVO SERIES SSD M.2
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.