Im not sure on the timeline. I tried to investigate, but could not get a definitive answer. I admit its a strange one

 

8 minutes ago, simbol said:

the project from Aerosoft dying is baffling me, I thought they had access to the Beta program

Aerosoft was only publishing the product, not developing it. I guess the the dev doing it didn't have access.

7 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

Yep.....that's why we have posts all over the place, even at MSFS own forums....with comparisons in mass.

You believe the extra performance came out of nothing right? Asobo magic? 

Please wake up. Xbox....millions of users.....why do they really wanna care about you and me...we niche users? 

 

Still look beautiful to me

Edited August 1, 20214 yr by Tuskin38

2 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

And you're missing all the evidence where they do care. A few bugs doesn't mean they don't care.

It hasn't even been a week since it released, give them time to collect all the bug reports buried under all the unhelpful complaining.

You mean the bugs that are in since release? You mean the SDK wich is still lacking a lot? And that's why some bigger players developed around it and get in trouble with their products now? You mean the fps increase at the cost of visuals just around the Xbox release....?

1 minute ago, mpo910 said:

They needed us, ORBX and Aerosoft to get our trust.....believe it will be the next gen sim for PC.

And then....ORBX, PMDG AND Aerosoft partners ...

Now that's settled....Xbox is target....because we niche tested it enough....brought market enough to test streaming data...server load....

And Xbox release is ready....

Now the millions are coming to MSFS 

 

 

 

 

 

Yea, you need a rest i think. Your mind's racing too much 😄 

2 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

Now that's settled....Xbox is target

Both platforms are equal targets.

1 minute ago, Tuskin38 said:

Aerosoft was only publishing the product, not developing it. I guess the the dev doing it didn't have access.

Still look beautiful to me

 

 

 

 

Eww, looks so FSXy, it hurts my eyyyyyezzzzz

4 minutes ago, simbol said:

I am as baffled as you..

As I am. From the style of that Mr. Kok announcement, I get the impression, it's sort of a political thing, and there's quite more going on behind the curtain than pure souls like me can comprehend.

Kind regards, Michael

Just now, leprechaunlive said:

Yea, you need a rest i think. Your mind's racing too much 😄 

It's the increased FPS.....its magic.

Now honestly....this is the most bad update MSFS has rushed out since release....

And I'm concerned that we simmers are really not their market anymore.....

4 minutes ago, threegreen said:

Don't you just love a Sunday night avsim forum drama thread! A+ entertainment. Now where's my popcorn...

Indeed!

Team EA/TrueSky vs Team Xbox. -who will fix their issues first? Oh the suspense😂

Just now, pmb said:

As I am. From the style of that Mr. Kok announcement, I get the impression, it's sort of a political thing, and there's quite more going on behind the curtain than pure souls like me can comprehend.

Kind regards, Michael

that would be my guess too. We dont know half of the story!

1 minute ago, pmb said:

As I am. From the style of that Mr. Kok announcement, I get the impression, it's sort of a political thing, and there's quite more going on behind the curtain than pure souls like me can comprehend.

Kind regards, Michael

Yes. That's really amazing isn't it. Mr Kok how was a long time VERY CLOSE behind Jörg...is now shooting public

1 minute ago, mpo910 said:

They needed us, ORBX and Aerosoft to get our trust.....believe it will be the next gen sim for PC.

And then....ORBX, PMDG AND Aerosoft partners ...

Now that's settled....Xbox is target....because we niche tested it enough....brought market enough to test streaming data...server load....

And Xbox release is ready....

Now the millions are coming to MSFS 

There are so many logical contradictions and fallacies in what you wrote right there, it'd difficult to know where to begin. So instead, I won't bother. 🤣

1 minute ago, SAS443 said:

Indeed!

Team EA/TrueSky vs Team Xbox. -who will fix their issues first? Oh the suspense😂

At least P3D had better LOD

6 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

Now the millions are coming to MSFS 

And why is that bad?

7 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

Fact is...SU5 has broken a lot....and reduced visuals a lot and was sold as a performance update....which the majority did believe.....but the minority saw this coming with visual degradation.

I thought so at first but then found out most of the visual degradations were recoverable:

• Object LOD can be increased in the cfg.
• Colorgradation can be disabled in the cfg.
• Monitor / Nvidia settings can be tweaked further for colours (simply setting my panel to ‘gaming’ mode made a huge difference)
• Reverting Nvidia driver to 466.77 virtually eliminated problems with the AA, cloud pixelation, and artefacting.

And the bloom actually does a really good job of representing glare, even on a SDR panel.

The bug meaning settings are not being saved seems like a real hassle (luckily don’t have it here), but I really think the visuals have actually been improved now, and I tend to focus on them a lot.