November 7, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Tuskin38 said: Source? What do you think, I make it up? You can’t take someone’s word anymore? Gimme a break. Here’s your source: Eric
November 7, 20241 yr Excellent update by Fenix. The aircraft is running very well on my older machine now. Sharklets look great!
November 7, 20241 yr 16 minutes ago, B777ER said: What do you think, I make it up? You can’t take someone’s word anymore? Not in the modern age of misinformation. also Edited November 7, 20241 yr by Tuskin38
November 7, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, skully said: Excellent update by Fenix. The aircraft is running very well on my older machine now. Sharklets look great! My, that's a handsome screenshot right there. Edited November 7, 20241 yr by Abriael Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com
November 7, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, Farlis said: First and foremost it is their sim, and their decision to make. Second I'd argue that they simply picked the better approach. The only discriminating factor was whether you were on the marketplace or not. It doesn't matter if you sell lots of units or not, if you are an awesome developer or not. It was the most objective choice that does not open oneself up to being called out on favoritism. I fundamentally agree with your take on things. I just don’t think by he word favoritism should have ever been used. After all, to your first point, it’s their decision. My ultimate personal opinion on the matter is that they made an accurate decision. However I think they could have used a little more precision in their decision making process. It’s only an opinion and doesn’t necessarily suggest I disagree with their decision. FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠 Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024
November 7, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Abriael said: No. It's called using an objective deciding factor, which is the opposite of "favoritism." What you're advocating is to allow people in based on subjective judgment, which is the very definition of favoritism and would only serve to tell people who don't get in "sorry buddy, we don't consider you good enough." The only ones being "dramatic" here are those trying to pass this as some sort of Lèse-majesté and get outraged on behalf of a developer who isn't, in fact, outraged at all. Chill. I’m not outraged. I don’t know why you jumped to that conclusion. The decisions that asobo/MS Don’t affect me on a personal like they do for some people. Favoritism wouldn’t have been automatically at play if asobo/MS decided to hand pick who got access and who didn’t. FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠 Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024
November 7, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, ahsmatt7 said: Favoritism wouldn’t have been automatically at play if asobo/MS decided to hand pick who got access and who didn’t. Hand-picking studios to include and excluding others according to arbitrary parameters is the literal definition of favoritism. Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com
November 7, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Abriael said: My, that's a handsome screenshot right there. dense fog obviously Edited November 7, 20241 yr by DAD Phil Leaven i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, ASUS 4070 12GB EVO, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), Rolling Cache 16GB, Photogrammetry always OFF, Live Weather and Live Traffic always ON, Res 2560x1440 on 27"
November 7, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Abriael said: Hand-picking studios to include and excluding others according to arbitrary parameters is the literal definition of favoritism. No it’s not. The definition of favoritism includes the word unfair, not arbitrary. FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠 Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024
November 7, 20241 yr 15 minutes ago, ahsmatt7 said: No it’s not. The definition of favoritism includes the word unfair, not arbitrary. "Fairness" is subjective. For you it would be fair to include Fenix as a special case. For other developers who value their contribution to flight simulation as relevant as Fenix's (and their fans), it'd be unfair. The very foundation of fairness is not giving anyone special treatment. Edited November 7, 20241 yr by Abriael Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com
November 7, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, skully said: Excellent update by Fenix. The aircraft is running very well on my older machine now. Sharklets look great! Is that default scenery ? Looks great MSFS2020, 24, Fenix A320, Ryzen 9 9950X3D, ASUS TUF RTX 5090 ,G.SKILL 64GB 6000MHz CL28
November 7, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Abriael said: My, that's a handsome screenshot right there. Thank you! 9 minutes ago, roi1862 said: Is that default scenery ? Looks great Thank you! Yes indeed, it's the default Niagara Falls, NY scenery.
November 7, 20241 yr Yes how do you you get the heading and altitude to work with my joystick … every other plane works but not this one?? Regards Paul EGCC
November 7, 20241 yr Anyone with the WinWings FCU having issues after this update? Mine isn't working anymore 😞 14900ks, RTX4090, 64Gb@6000-30-36-36-T2, Samsung 990Pro 2Tb , Dell G3223Q 32" 4k Gsync + 27" secondary monitor. Thrustmaster Airbus Edition throttles etc, TPR pedals, MiniCockpit FCU, WinWings FCU, WinWings Orion 2 F15E, WinWings A320 sticks.
Create an account or sign in to comment