November 7, 20241 yr On 11/5/2024 at 2:58 PM, Abriael said: No. It is not. The only objective discriminating factor was marketplace presence. Ultimately, if they start making exceptions based on quality (or perceived quality, because then other developers with high opinions of their work would feel slighted) where do they draw the line? Who decides the quality threshold? Who decides how many above that threshold should be included? And especially, who tells the others that they're not considered good enough? Who decides who is "significant" and who isn't? What you're advocating is called favoritism. It’s not favoritism, stop being so dramatic. Asobo/microsoft are well aware of the developers who have paved the way like fenix has. There is no reason why they couldn’t have given access to the big hitter developers so said developers can Offer a smooth transition for their customers. one could argue it’s “favoritism” only allowing developers in the marketplace to have access. FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠 Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024
November 7, 20241 yr Thanks I’ll have to save that list. I wonder if they could just add something to the thumbnail in the livery downloaded? Not elegant perhaps, but a workable solution. Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
November 7, 20241 yr I just gotta say the ground handling is amazing ! They did a really good job on that MSFS2020, 24, Fenix A320, Ryzen 9 9950X3D, ASUS TUF RTX 5090 ,G.SKILL 64GB 6000MHz CL28
November 7, 20241 yr On 11/5/2024 at 3:18 PM, Silicuss said: Apparently only developers from the Marketplace have access to the development alpha..... I was complaining about it in another threat... On 11/5/2024 at 3:58 PM, Abriael said: No. It is not. The only objective discriminating factor was marketplace presence. On 11/5/2024 at 4:02 PM, Tuskin38 said: AFAIK no devs outside of the marketplace have access. REX does not sell on Marketplace yet they had access. REX dev himself confirmed as such. Now what do you got? Eric
November 7, 20241 yr I'm curios to see how the new custom wingflex animation looks! Jesse Casserly ✌🏼️ https://www.youtube.com/user/JesseCasserly757 💻 i7-10750H 2.6 GHz / 5.0 GHz, 16GB DDR4, 512GB SSD, 1TB HDD, RTX 2080 Super Saitek X-56 HOTAS
November 7, 20241 yr 19 minutes ago, B777ER said: REX does not sell on Marketplace yet they had access. REX dev himself confirmed as such. Now what do you got? Source?
November 7, 20241 yr The Cargo load possible is the same in the EFB as the none ACT's .Should this be noted in the Simbrief profile that some of this space is also sharing fuel? 25459lbs (including ACT) Michael Moe Edited November 7, 20241 yr by Michael Moe Michael Moe
November 7, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, ahsmatt7 said: one could argue it’s “favoritism” only allowing developers in the marketplace to have access. First and foremost it is their sim, and their decision to make. Second I'd argue that they simply picked the better approach. The only discriminating factor was whether you were on the marketplace or not. It doesn't matter if you sell lots of units or not, if you are an awesome developer or not. It was the most objective choice that does not open oneself up to being called out on favoritism.
November 7, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, ahsmatt7 said: It’s not favoritism, stop being so dramatic. Asobo/microsoft are well aware of the developers who have paved the way like fenix has. There is no reason why they couldn’t have given access to the big hitter developers so said developers can Offer a smooth transition for their customers. one could argue it’s “favoritism” only allowing developers in the marketplace to have access. No. It's called using an objective deciding factor, which is the opposite of "favoritism." What you're advocating is to allow people in based on subjective judgment, which is the very definition of favoritism and would only serve to tell people who don't get in "sorry buddy, we don't consider you good enough." The only ones being "dramatic" here are those trying to pass this as some sort of Lèse-majesté and get outraged on behalf of a developer who isn't, in fact, outraged at all. Chill. Edited November 7, 20241 yr by Abriael Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com
November 7, 20241 yr I really like the new EFB feature where your charts are automatically picked for you through your Simbrief flightplan.
November 7, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Tuskin38 said: Source? I think he means this post FS2024 • PMDG 738, 77F • FSL A321 • A2A Comanche, Aerostar • BS Baron, Bonanza, Caravan Pro • JF Tomahawk • TAOG H500C BeyondATC • GSX Pro • ChasePlane & Flow Pro • TDS GTNXi • FSUIPC • AutoFPS • RealTurb 9800X3D B650E • ROG OC RTX 5090 • 64GB DDR5-6000 • VKB Gladiator, STECS, T-Rudder • Tobii 5 • ISP 1 Gbps
November 7, 20241 yr Has anyone else had the aircraft folders missing from the community folder after the upgrade? Had to remove then re-add the packages in the installer. Weird, maybe a fluke. Thx all. Edited November 7, 20241 yr by masaki Stefan Ticusan
Create an account or sign in to comment