Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

Source?

What do you think, I make it up? You can’t take someone’s word anymore? Gimme a break. Here’s your source:

 

  • Upvote 1

Eric 

 

 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, B777ER said:

What do you think, I make it up? You can’t take someone’s word anymore?

Not in the modern age of misinformation. 

also

 

Edited by Tuskin38
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, skully said:

Excellent update by Fenix.

The aircraft is running very well on my older machine now.

Sharklets look great!

ydq4tjbx.png

My, that's a handsome screenshot right there. 

Edited by Abriael
  • Like 2

spacer.png

Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com

spacer.png

Posted
3 hours ago, Farlis said:

 

First and foremost it is their sim, and their decision to make.

Second I'd argue that they simply picked the better approach. The only discriminating factor was whether you were on the marketplace or not. It doesn't matter if you sell lots of units or not, if you are an awesome developer or not. It was the most objective choice that does not open oneself up to being called out on favoritism.

I fundamentally agree with your take on things. I just don’t think  by he word favoritism should have ever been used. After all, to your first point, it’s their decision. 
 

My ultimate personal opinion on the matter is that they made an accurate decision. However I think they could have used a little more precision in their decision making process. It’s only an opinion and doesn’t necessarily suggest I disagree with their decision.

FAA: ATP-ME

Matt kubanda

Posted
2 hours ago, Abriael said:

No. It's called using an objective deciding factor, which is the opposite of "favoritism."

What you're advocating is to allow people in based on subjective judgment, which is the very definition of favoritism and would only serve to tell people who don't get in "sorry buddy, we don't consider you good enough."

The only ones being "dramatic" here are those trying to pass this as some sort of Lèse-majesté and get outraged on behalf of a developer who isn't, in fact, outraged at all. 

Chill. 

I’m not outraged. I don’t know why you jumped to that conclusion. The decisions that asobo/MS Don’t affect me on a personal like they do for some people. 
 

Favoritism wouldn’t have been automatically at play if asobo/MS decided to hand pick who got access and who didn’t.  

FAA: ATP-ME

Matt kubanda

Posted
3 minutes ago, ahsmatt7 said:

Favoritism wouldn’t have been automatically at play if asobo/MS decided to hand pick who got access and who didn’t.  

Hand-picking studios to include and excluding others according to arbitrary parameters is the literal definition of favoritism. 

spacer.png

Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com

spacer.png

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Abriael said:

My, that's a handsome screenshot right there. 

dense fog obviously

Edited by DAD

Phil Leaven

i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, MSI 3060 12GB OC, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), MSFS Cache and Photogrammetry always disabled, Live Weather and Live Traffic always on, Res 2560x1440 on 27"

Posted
1 hour ago, Abriael said:

Hand-picking studios to include and excluding others according to arbitrary parameters is the literal definition of favoritism. 

No it’s not. The definition of favoritism includes the word unfair, not arbitrary. 

  • Upvote 1

FAA: ATP-ME

Matt kubanda

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, ahsmatt7 said:

No it’s not. The definition of favoritism includes the word unfair, not arbitrary. 

"Fairness" is subjective. 

For you it would be fair to include Fenix as a special case. For other developers who value their contribution to flight simulation as relevant as Fenix's (and their fans), it'd be unfair. The very foundation of fairness is not giving anyone special treatment.

Edited by Abriael

spacer.png

Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com

spacer.png

Posted
2 hours ago, skully said:

Excellent update by Fenix.

The aircraft is running very well on my older machine now.

Sharklets look great!

Is that default scenery ? Looks great 

Roi Ben

Posted
1 hour ago, Abriael said:

My, that's a handsome screenshot right there. 

Thank you!

9 minutes ago, roi1862 said:

Is that default scenery ? Looks great 

Thank you!

Yes indeed, it's the default Niagara Falls, NY scenery.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes how do you you get the heading and altitude to work with my joystick … every other plane works but not this one?? 

Regards

Paul EGCC

Posted

Anyone with the WinWings FCU having issues after this update? Mine isn't working anymore 😞 

14900ks, RTX4090, 64Gb@6000-30-36-36-T2, Samsung 990Pro 2Tb , Dell G3223Q 32" 4k Gsync + 27" secondary monitor.
Thrustmaster Airbus Edition throttles etc, TPR pedals, MiniCockpit FCU, WinWings FCU, WinWings Orion 2 F15E, WinWings A320 sticks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...