March 8, 20251 yr 4 minutes ago, carlanthony24 said: It really wasn't Whose fault is that you believed in a scam?
March 8, 20251 yr 1 minute ago, Vitold69 said: Whose fault is that you believed in a scam? It wasn't a scam. We got what they advertised. Edited March 8, 20251 yr by Tuskin38
March 8, 20251 yr 5 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said: I see no evidence of the majority being unhappy. I see no evidence that the majority are being happy either with this product. But you enjoy it for what it is but it is not a special product. Surely not top of the list. Edited March 8, 20251 yr by JBDB-MD80
March 8, 20251 yr 1 minute ago, Vitold69 said: Whose fault is that you believed in a scam? Oh please, stop with the dramatic hyperbole 🙂 ... where is the scam here? It is out there plain to see what the pros and cons are. If you feel it doesn't meet your bar then don't get it. Seems like some around here who're not keen on getting it seem to not like the fact that a lot of others do like it (usual avsim syndrome). Len 1980s: Sublogic FS II on C64 ---> 1990s: Flight Unlimited I/II, MSFS 95/98 ---> 2000s/2010s: FS/X, P3D, XP ---> 2020+: MSFS Current system: i9 13900K, RTX 4090, 64GB DDR5 4800 RAM, 4TB NVMe SSD
March 8, 20251 yr 7 hours ago, GoranM said: Some streamers get briefed by some developers. Not all, but I think it’s obvious on both sides. But it's still a live stream and a few of the pre-release streamers had WASM freezes/crashes.
March 8, 20251 yr 5 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said: Considering the competition with other High Fidelity airlines, no its not. The discord people especially this morning say how dissatisfied they are. Too much hype not what was advertised. Even Youtube comments say they want refunds.
March 8, 20251 yr 6 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said: I see no evidence of the majority being unhappy. Please do take a look at the Discord
March 8, 20251 yr 4 minutes ago, Vitold69 said: Whose fault is that you believed in a scam? I didn't believe in a scam. I didn't purchase knowing what the other products before this were like and still are.
March 8, 20251 yr 5 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said: It wasn't a scam. We got what they advertised. You didn't. True to life how can you claim that when its proven to show 320 systems. I will get at some point in its current state no thank you. Edited March 8, 20251 yr by carlanthony24
March 8, 20251 yr 6 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said: It wasn't a scam. We got what they advertised. No its not a scam but a hype "money grabber" They knew everyone wanted a A350 and they delivered a subpar product at a high dollar price compared to more other superior products in MSFS. Its no doubt about this.
March 8, 20251 yr 6 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said: No its not a scam but a hype "money grabber" They knew everyone wanted a A350 and they delivered a subpar product at a high dollar price compared to more other superior products in MSFS. Its no doubt about this. Shouldn't need to enter a sim update beta to make the plane work either.
March 8, 20251 yr 9 minutes ago, carlanthony24 said: Shouldn't need to enter a sim update beta to make the plane work either. Well we all know Inibuilds are a big partner with MS/Asobo so let them sort it out. Its not our problem They need to sort it out and not us. But somehow we are labeled haters around here for some negativity, instead of reality talk. SU1 is not going to solve many issues with 2024 maybe by 2026 though. Edited March 8, 20251 yr by JBDB-MD80
March 8, 20251 yr 4 hours ago, EGLD said: are there videos that confirm this? i'd like to drop 70 dollar on this, but i've seen zero evidence - maybe even just a vid of say taxiiing at 20 knots and slamming on the brakes - does the nose drop as expected? spot view of a hard landing would be awesome as well I would like to see these kinds of videos as well. In terms of taxiing physics, it's been confirmed the ini A350 does use the new ground contact model and physics, they talk about and show it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cjLdfEfTow&t=2970s (i.e skidding, carrying of momentum, etc). The ini A300 also started using it in MSFS 2020 >=SU15 as they showed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4cxNccH66U&t=1318s. Now re: the ini A350 landing physics and compression of gear, at the very least we know it's *not* showing in replay videos. What I'd like to confirm is if the animation shows on external views on landing and more importantly if at least the new physics are being employed despite the visuals not being there fully or completely yet. Given that the FM is using the new ground contact model, and given that some have seen the compression parameters defined in the aircraft .cfg files that seems to suggest the physics are at least there. But yes, would be good to confirm. The core MSFS platform definitely has landing gear compression physics so either the ini A350 doesn't employ it at all, or well enough, or there are bugs. Edited March 8, 20251 yr by lwt1971 Len 1980s: Sublogic FS II on C64 ---> 1990s: Flight Unlimited I/II, MSFS 95/98 ---> 2000s/2010s: FS/X, P3D, XP ---> 2020+: MSFS Current system: i9 13900K, RTX 4090, 64GB DDR5 4800 RAM, 4TB NVMe SSD
March 8, 20251 yr The newest update now introduced my first WASM crash with the aircraft. Great... until now I had none, now with the newest update that supposedly fixed so many, I get my first one.
March 8, 20251 yr Just now, Farlis said: The newest update now introduced my first WASM crash with the aircraft. Great... until now I had none, now with the newest update that supposedly fixed so many, I get my first one. Have you cleaned the WASM cache?
Create an account or sign in to comment