March 14, 20251 yr 4 hours ago, Egbert Drenth said: Question.... Does anyone knows how to connect the TM TCA Airbus throttles using SpadNext? I can't get SpadNext moving the throttles I don't have the TM throttles, using the VKB Sim Stecs here but also had some issues finding the right Lvar for the throttles. I use a custom axis configuration mapped to: THROTTLE1_AXIS_SET_EX1 Range definition: NO Rescale Value YES, from -16383 to 16383 Use Axis Value: ON Use raw/rescaled Value: ON Invert: OFF And obviously duplicate for THROTTLE2_Axis Not sure if that would work on the TM but those settings move the throttles for me using spad.next.
March 14, 20251 yr Nice update. However there is still no default binding for Honeycomb Bravo like heading, altitude, VS...:( Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
March 15, 20251 yr This aircraft is a refreshing change to a modern airliner. I didn't get the first one as that was a little too retro for my tastes, but V2 of the F28 is a good challenge. CPU Ryzen 7800X 3D RAM 32GB Corsair VENGEANCE DDR5 6000MHz GPU GEFORCE RTX 4090 Monitor AOC AGON AG352UCG UltraWide G-Sync @ 3440x1440 Internal Storage 1TB NVMe PCIe SSD External Storage Three 4Tb HDs
March 15, 20251 yr 11 hours ago, stefaandk said: I use a custom axis configuration mapped to: THROTTLE1_AXIS_SET_EX1 Got it working now. Works like a charm! Thanks Location: Vleuten, The Netherlands, 17.3dme SPL 108.40 | Simulator: FS2024 System: AMD 7800X3D - Gigabyte X670 - RTX 4090 - 64GB DDR5 - 2 x 2TB SSD - 32" 1440p Display - Windows 11 Pro
March 15, 20251 yr Looks like they've done a stellar job on the flight model.. 320 Sim Pilot's first look below was very informative, including when he tried the stall conditions unique to this aircraft at timestamp below. Very temped to pick this up for some high fidelity retro action. Len 1980s: Sublogic FS II on C64 ---> 1990s: Flight Unlimited I/II, MSFS 95/98 ---> 2000s/2010s: FS/X, P3D, XP ---> 2020+: MSFS Current system: i9 13900K, RTX 4090, 64GB DDR5 4800 RAM, 4TB NVMe SSD
March 15, 20251 yr 23 hours ago, Purr said: Only thing for me it the six pack of instruments are quite small and therefore hard to read. I understand perspective wise they are some distance away under the glareshield but I have always wished for an option for a clickspot that could increase the size even 10-20% for improved readability. It's especially critical during take off and approach landing. I’m surprised no one else has this problem, I certainly do, it spoils the aircraft for me in VR. I know JF will have scanned the flight deck and accurately portrayed the instruments at the correct size so it’s no fault of theirs, it’s just the way the real aircraft is designed. 787 captain. Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1.
March 15, 20251 yr Yes, I have exactly this problem in VR (Q3) - the front panel is too small and the overhead is too large. I've been meaning too play around with the default VR eye position to see if I can change any of this. Disappointingly the new FMS is also too small and very hard to read in VR. I'm sure the sizes are correct from a design perspective, but its not getting rendered right for some reason. The Miltech C-17 is also 'wrong', but in this case the MFDs are huge and the text on them oversize, like something for children. ...
Create an account or sign in to comment