14 hours ago, jcomm said:

Very well, and it was rather windy for the 05. But it managed it very well, and manually flying the final app was really rewarding!

All that 05 approach needs now is for Atelic to create more detailed versions of a couple of bridges down below, and it will be perfect (and yes, I have sent in a request for this)

1 hour ago, mrlip said:

2024 marketplace is not open to 3rd party products yet

Well, I hope that's the issue. 

22 hours ago, jcomm said:

Finalmente encontré algo de tiempo para "volarlo" y hasta ahora me han impresionado positivamente varios aspectos de la simulación.

Hice un par de vuelos, LPMA-LPPT y LEMD-LPPT, bajo condiciones climáticas realmente desagradables en la vida real sobre la Península Ibérica, y desde el rendimiento que es básicamente suave como la seda a 30 fps, sin tartamudeos, hasta los detalles del complejo OIS y otros sistemas que todavía me hacen leer y estudiar la "nueva" cabina, e incluso un aterrizaje automático bajo ráfagas de viento y turbulencias, realmente creo que es un modelo muy bonito de un A350.

Gráficamente, es más de lo que necesitaba. Con gusto reduciría un poco la resolución de la textura, a 1K, pero supongo que no es posible.

Entonces, solo noté algún tipo de tendencia a inclinarse agresivamente bajo algunas circunstancias, llevando el ángulo de inclinación al límite de 30º, pero, por ejemplo, las oscilaciones de cabeceo que había visto en algunos videos de YouTube de usuarios que volaban con versiones anteriores a la 1.0.4 no ocurrieron en mis pruebas.

Pregunté en el foro de soporte sobre el único aspecto que me enojó sobre la forma en que se implementa una característica particular y, por la respuesta que obtuve en ese hilo, tal vez sea incluso un resultado realista de encender las luces Beacon 🙂  pero fue doloroso ver la mayoría de mis sistemas muriendo cuando, listo para iniciar la APU, decidí encenderlos y obtuve una "grave escasez de energía" 😕  porque la GPU estaba desconectada ...

I'm glad you like it Bro, so you make time while they release GTA6.😉

22 hours ago, jcomm said:

.) CPU AMD 5600 x, GPU Nvidia Geeforce 3060 Ti 8GB VRAM, 32GB RAM, 1TB nvme 2, Win 11;

.) 200/20 mbps Internet (coaxial) somewhere in Porta Land, where the Internet begins 🤣

.) MSFS 2024 only;

.) Fps limited to 30 using Riva Tuner, Vsync not used, nor any adaptive options in sim or Nvidia;

.) GRAPHIS Settings:

  Reveal hidden contents

Display mode: Full screen

Full screen resolution: 1920 x 1080

Anti-aliasing: TAA

Render scaling: 100

AMD FidelityFX Sharpening: 100

V-Sync: not selected

Nvidia reflex low latency: On

Frame rate limit: 100% monitor rate

Dynamic settings: not selected

Global rendering quality: Custom

ADVANCED SETTINGS

Terrain Level of Detail: 50

Off Screen Terrain Pre-caching: Medium

Displacement Mapping: not selected

Buildings: Medium

Trees: Medium

Plants: Low

Rocks: Low

Grass: Low

Objects Levels of Detail: 50

Volumetric clouds: High

Texture Resolution: Medium

Anisotropic Filtering: 4x

Water waves: Medium

Raytraced Shadows: not selected

Shadow maps: 1024

Terrain shadows: 256

Contact shadows: Medium

Windshield Effects: High

Ambient Occlusion: Medium

Cubemap Reflections: 192

Raymarched Reflections: Medium

Light Shafts: Medium

Depth Of Field: Medium

Motion Blur: Off

Glass Cockpit refresh rate: Medium

Characters Quality: Medium

Traffic Airport Quality: Off

Air Traffic: Off

Road Traffic: Medium

Sea Traffic: Low

Fauna: Off

 

.) FSLTL Traffic with textures reduced to 512 KB

.) BATC ATC and Traffic Injection with traffic sliders at heir default mid range;

.) Default Scenery and Weather;

.) Uninstaller Mode - Off 😁

I haven't succeeded in reducing FSLTL texture. MSFS 2020 here.

On 3/21/2025 at 7:31 AM, SierraDelta said:

No need to cross-post, you’re in 3 different threads with your mistake now. Only Inibuilds can sort this for you.

I understand his frustration. Why you tell him what he should not have done or needed?

I prefer a much more welcome mentality...and less "against" others.

Try it.....it's harmless:-)

 

I have been flying A350 for last few weeks, The only plane I fly in the sim other then 737 max. Performance is steady even my old graphics card, Been flying out of payware airports like inibuilds Heathrow and Dubai on Vatsim with reasonable traffic and very little impact on performance.

I do like how OIS has been implemented, With navigraph charts integration as well as take-off/landing calculations which can be accomplished with ease. I also like whole datalink communication and how it has been built into the aircraft - Have used it many times on Vatsim and no issues. Flying RNP approaches is now much more fun - can do all sorts of stuff like FLS/SLS/GLS approaches, I flew SLS type RNP approach into Geneva the other night and aircraft handled perfectly. Hand flying does take some time to get use to, requires smaller control inputs otherwise I find you can very quickly get yourself into what's known as "pilot induced oscillation" - this is especially true on approach. Over control this like smaller airbuses and it can ruin your approach very quickly. 

How do I get GSX to work with the A350 in MSFS 2024?

6 hours ago, Boomer said:

How do I get GSX to work with the A350 in MSFS 2024?

go to the ground section of the efb than enable gsx  than you will see option on  the top right hand side of the efb