Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Is Prepar3D an end of life sim?

Featured Replies

On 9/22/2025 at 5:19 PM, shermank said:

I think we all have seen the Prepar3d.commdown for repairs.

but I have never seen this before

https://prepar3d.com/

does. “Database error” mean LM taken the forum offline?

sherm

back on line when I last checked a few hours ago.


Sherm

  • Replies 135
  • Views 13.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Dead is in the eye of the beholder, I say.  If you are not using it, it may be dead to you and most of the simmers here.  But to the commercial aviation industry it is quite active.  I know because we

  • Ray Proudfoot
    Ray Proudfoot

    Hi Hervé, A reduction is to be expected. We’re probably down to a hard core now who will still fly P3D even if they switch over to 2024 occasionally which might or might not be replaced by 2028.

  • Hamilton_
    Hamilton_

    I don´t care about Navigraph Survey, for me P3D is very much alive and it will continue to be on my PC, as well as on several others such as FS2004, FS98. I don't need new addons for P3D, I alrea

  • Moderator
2 hours ago, Patco Lch said:

We’ll forgive me for trying to help a friend.

geez, no good deed goes unpunished. 

Why are you taking it so personally? I had a look and decided it wasn’t for me. Thanks for the recommendation anyway.

Ray (Cheshire, England).

System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant.

Cheadle Hulme Weather website.

chlive.php

4 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Why are you taking it so personally? I had a look and decided it wasn’t for me. Thanks for the recommendation anyway.

just joking, I thought someone might get a little chuckle.

Vic green

You can't joke on these forums.🤬

Pete Locascio

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, Nvidia RTX 5090, Samsung 9100 Pro 2&4 TB Drives, 64 GB RAM, Asus Z-890 motherboard.

 

  • Moderator
11 minutes ago, Patco Lch said:

just joking, I thought someone might get a little chuckle.

In all honesty it didn’t come across as a joke. I thought you were being deadly serious.

Ray (Cheshire, England).

System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant.

Cheadle Hulme Weather website.

chlive.php

14 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Looking at your numbers the external seems to be half the speed of internal.

As you wish.
In my world, 538.99 megabytes per second is much slower than 1028.37 megabytes per second.
This is one of my internal M2 SSDs.
Slower still?

 Hmhumot.jpeg

  • Moderator
4 hours ago, Reader said:

As you wish.
In my world, 538.99 megabytes per second is much slower than 1028.37 megabytes per second.
This is one of my internal M2 SSDs.
Slower still?

 

I misread the read numbers. The external is faster. How come? Do you have a particularly slow internal SSD.

Ray (Cheshire, England).

System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant.

Cheadle Hulme Weather website.

chlive.php

8 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

I misread the read numbers. The external is faster. How come? Do you have a particularly slow internal SSD.

No, as I mentioned, just because drives are external, no longer means that they must be slow.
USB C seems to have taken care of that.

6 hours ago, Reader said:

No, as I mentioned, just because drives are external, no longer means that they must be slow.
USB C seems to have taken care of that.

I appreciate reading this because I too felt the same as Ray. I need more space and was going to pick up maybe another 12 TB but will consider external now.

system i9 10850K NVidia RTX3090 24GB Samsung SSD980 m.2 1TB (x2) Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD Seagate 2TB external drive Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB SSD Asus B460M-PLUS Mobo 32GB GSkill DDR4 3000mhz Ram using P3D v5.3

On 9/25/2025 at 12:48 PM, ywg256 said:

I appreciate reading this because I too felt the same as Ray. I need more space and was going to pick up maybe another 12 TB but will consider external now.

Please ensure you examine the published transfer speeds on the drive inside the enclosure (and probably check a few reviews as well). I've seen quite a few drive manufacturers put slow drives in "fast" USB enclosures so they can sell at a lower price.

Also beware that the USB-C spec has variable data speeds dependent on the hardware on both sides of the connection (e.g., Thunderbolt). ALSO ensure you have a quality cable that's capable of handling the speeds of both your external storage & USB port.

ANY of those things being off-spec can utterly hobble I/O performance.

@Reader

Edited by UrgentSiesta

1 hour ago, UrgentSiesta said:

ANY of those things being off-spec can utterly hobble I/O performance.

@Reader

 I'm sure you are right, however, my point, which still stands, is that the previous situation, where 
by definition, an external drive was much slower than an internal one, is no longer the case.

40 minutes ago, Reader said:

 I'm sure you are right, however, my point, which still stands, is that the previous situation, where 
by definition, an external drive was much slower than an internal one, is no longer the case.

Yes, i generally agree. 👍

However, it's also true that it's always been possible to have external storage that outperforms internal storage, too.

I.e., one must pay close attention to all the components in order to ensure the expected/desired performance is delivered. My main point is "Caveat Emptor", especially when it comes to "USB" devices. 🙂

 

Edited by UrgentSiesta

The fastest real-world transfer speed one can expect for an external SSD drive will be around 1.8 GB/s. Assuming you have the latest USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 ports.

For internal NVMe SSD drives, using PCIe 4.0, speed will be around 7 GB/s, or 12 GB/s when using PCIe 5.

So yes, there is a substantial  difference

 

AMD 7 7700X, 32GB DDR5, RTX 5060ti 16GB, 2 x Samsung 1TB NVMe, 1 x 4TB sata SSD, Windows 11 Prof

Just now, willy647 said:

So yes, there is a substantial  difference


The comparison is between internal and external SSDs of the same type,
not different types of SSDs.
Of course an M2 is faster.:hemm:

  • Moderator

A reminder that the title of this topic is P3D, not the speeds of SSDs. Get back on topic please.

Ray (Cheshire, England).

System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant.

Cheadle Hulme Weather website.

chlive.php

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.