Yes, but how much does Electricity cost to keep that temperature all year? A small fortune I am sure.

18 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

I’ve seen nothing in TV forecasts to suggest 40°C will be reached. That 2022 temperature did have low humidity. 22% with 18% the previous day according to my stats.

Nobody can say "will". It's "could". It was either in a video or elsewhere. I wouldn't have typed it if I hadn't seen it.

UK weather: Rare red extreme heat warning issued as temperatures could rise to 40C - BBC News https://share.google/YTxE04d45U3gPHcoH

Edited 21 hours ago21 hr by martin-w

18 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Maybe people think 75 is elderly. I don’t and take sensible precautions

You aren't a member of the vulnerable the alerts are aimed at then. There are plenty of people at 75 who are vulnerable, and 80, and 85, and 90, and older. And infants, children, pregnant women, those with health conditions.

36 minutes ago, martin-w said:

You aren't a member of the vulnerable the alerts are aimed at then. There are plenty of people at 75 who are vulnerable, and 80, and 85, and 90, and older. And infants, children, pregnant women, those with health conditions.

Most people have common sense. These warnings are ignored by the vast majority. I’ve seen 20 year-olds lying in the sun overseas and suffering sunburn. I’ve never seen a 50+ year old do that as they have more common sense.

Everyone is vulnerable if they don’t use their brains.

11 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Everyone is vulnerable if they don’t use their brains.

Exactly!

Yes, you can still suffer serious ill effects from extreme heat, even if you follow all standard guidelines. While precautions like drinking water and staying in the shade dramatically reduce your risk, environmental and biological factors can overwhelm even the most cautious individuals

3 hours ago, DD_Arthur said:

Exactly!

Yes, but there are many in society who are still vulnerable regardless of using their brains. As quoted above, even following all the guidelines can still result in adverse consequencies. There are lots of people who are vulnerable due to health conditions. As for "using brains" there are those with early dementia that may not be as sharp.

The warnings are valid, even if they only help a small minority.

22 hours ago, birdguy said:

I don't have my air conditioner running all day. I have it set at a comfortable (for me) 80F. That's the temperature I keep it all year. I hear it go on and off as the day progresses.

Noel

80F inside the house is a bit too warm for most people. You're pretty old school and grew up without air conditioning so you can handle it better than most, I imagine. In July and August we'll set ours at 76F(24.5C) during the day, but that's about as warm as we want it. Before we go to bed we drop it down to 70F(21C) as it makes it easier to sleep.

We lived in south Italy for a few years back in the mid 90s and had no air conditioning. Our apartment was on the roof, sort of like a penthouse but only half the top floor as there were 2 units, so the sun blasted the whole structure all day. The interior temperature would get up to 85-86F(30C) even though the walls were concrete block. It was so uncomfortable that I would take a cold shower right before I went to bed, leave my body wet, and had a fan blowing on me in bed so I could sleep. Opening the windows to allow in a breeze didn't help because the breeze was actually hot air known as the Scirocco wind from northern Africa. I wonder how many Americans have ever had to endure something like that, other than old folks who grew up without air conditioning?

Dave

Edited 16 hours ago16 hr by dave2013

33 minutes ago, martin-w said:

As for "using brains" there are those with early dementia that may not be as sharp.

The warnings are valid, even if they only help a small minority.

Alas, there are a great many in the general population that have trouble utilising that big communications network that lies between our ears...

24 minutes ago, DD_Arthur said:

Alas, there are a great many in the general population that have trouble utilising that big communications network that lies between our ears...

Indeed.... perhaps why we should help them with warnings. 😀

There are no downsides to warning people so warn em, I say.

I think if the MetOffice didnt warn people much, im sure that would be deemed wrong by many, too.

Maybe we should have hydration breaks like the footballers? 😁 Every couple of hours a loud siren goes off, we drop everything and somebody runs over with a cold wet sponge and a bottle of water..

Edited 15 hours ago15 hr by martin-w

When we were out in field with the Army in Idaho in the middle of the summer the rule was a canteen of water every hour. We had a buddy system to make sure your partner was getting his/her water.

Noel

1 hour ago, martin-w said:

I think if the MetOffice didnt warn people much, im sure that would be deemed wrong by many, too.

I think that's what it is. We have the a similar issue here where the weather services now issue severe storm and tornado warnings to scare the bejesus out of everybody, and then it almost always turns out there was no actual sighted tornado, just a "radar indication" of "possible rotation".

However, if they didn't do this and there ended up being an actual tornado that killed people and/or destroyed property, they would be criticized for not issuing a warning.

Dave

Today, it's only 19C (67F) and light rain here. That's downright cold for June 22.

39 minutes ago, dave2013 said:

I think that's what it is. We have the a similar issue here where the weather services now issue severe storm and tornado warnings to scare the bejesus out of everybody, and then it almost always turns out there was no actual sighted tornado, just a "radar indication" of "possible rotation".

However, if they didn't do this and there ended up being an actual tornado that killed people and/or destroyed property, they would be criticized for not issuing a warning.

Dave

Our local TV station once said that there was a tornado at the intersection of two streets near my house.

After I returned home later, there was no damage either at the intersection, nor at my house. As it turns out, it was a "radar-indicated threat". I suppose there could have been a funnel up in the clouds, but it did not touch down. The local stations are in a bad spot, as they're darned if they do, darned if they don't as you mention.