borgfan

I've noticed a couple of small points which, if confirmed, might be for consideration in any future tweak. Firstly I suspect that the main panel OAT gauge is actually reading TAT. Also the OAT reading on the transponder seems to be truncated, maybe a font issue. It read -01 when TAT was actually -15. Observed during a flight using FSXA. Small points with what is otherwise a really nice aircraft to fly. Very happy with it.

I run a q6600, albeit overclocked to 3.1mhz. FSX performance is ok except for complex payware airports and/or lots of AI. I'd recommend adding more memory, bring it up to at least 4gb, I upgraded mine to 8gb and installed win7/64 - going 64bit made a big improvement in stablility and has added a couple of years to the life of the machine. Overclocking is worthwhile as it is essentially a free performance boost, just watch the temperatures and keep the PC clean and dust free. Used memory can be found quite cheaply on ebay. I did change my original ATI 4650 graphics to a Nvidia GTX460 and think this is about as far as it is worth going with such a system. So in summary, overclock your cpu, add more memory, use win7/64 and keep your fsx settings modest

Yes, I also wondered about these strange paths, and also assumed they were an anti-theft measure. Not a very clever idea though as there isn't an un-install programme provided for the Learjet.

Thanks for recognising the problem Dean. Looking at the photoscenery files, I believe the underlying imagery is ok, it just seems that the mask has been over generously applied and allowing the default to bleed through. This is evident by how the default scenery is graduated in visibility as per the mask density. Lets hoping a quick fix if possible to what otherwise is a decent and good value rendition of my home area.

That's exactly the same as I have, very disappointing to have such a large and significant area borked.

Had the same problem, which I fixed by changing the appropriate window size in panel.cfg to 400*700 (original was 400*600). size_mm=400,700 gauge00=PMDG_737NG_Main!CDU, 0,0,400,700,L

Flies great, excellent systems simulation, lots of very nice liveries, comprehensive documentation, definitely worth consideration. The overhead graphics are flat, but everything works. So if you value the flying experience more than the cosmetics (and the cockpit graphics are still very usable), highly recommended.

Thanks Jonathan, working fine ! Gerard

Hi Jonathan, Sorry no go, still get "..... invalid Win32 program"

Hi Jonathan, I agree its really frustrating to have these types of problem. I use Visual Studio 2010, though primarily with VB and don't have a problem just copying and running the .exe file - providing it has been compiled to use one of the .net versions installed on my PC. Might be worth checking the compile settings and the target framework. I think the express editions have fewer deployment options than the full blown product, but I dont think you can be far off getting it to work, so its worth perservering Tks

The FMC in the J41 is not nearly as sophisticated as those fitted to its bigger brothers and often has difficulty flying SID's, at least those I frequently fly in the UK. The FMC doesn't consistently process the Navigraph descriptions well and the results can be unpredictable. I did raise a problem report with PMDG some time ago about this issue and the response was essentially not to expect too much and to fly the SIDs by hand using conventional navigation aids as is the case in most real world operations. So that's what I do and it works ok.

Sorry error message when run "..... not a valid Win32 Application" I use WinXp Sp3 with .net V4/ V3.5/ V3/ V2 installed Any idea what the problem might be?

With my fairly low end PC ( by current standards), I find the Legacy is ok. FPS in the air is low 20's and drops to about 16 when at a complex airport. On my system I have found that running with FSP set to unlimited gives a better overall level of performance than locking it lower, eg 20. I reckon you should be fine, its a great model.

This looks great; promises nice graphics with good depth of simulation , looking forward immensely to its release. I've enjoyed flying the ATR-72 and this Dash will be a fantastic turboprop addition to FSX, I'll be purchasing on day one for sure

Having recently bought the BN2 Islander, I've also been looking at routes for it.... In Scotland Loganair fly the BN2 Islander between Kirkwall and the Orkney Islands, eg Stronsay, North Ronaldsay, Westray, Papa Westray, Sandy and Eday. You can get details here: http://info.flightmapper.net/airline/LOG The only scenery I am aware of is the GEN-X photographic scenery Vol5 covering Orkney and the Shetlands. I dont think BA operate any Islanders under their own livery, in Scotland, Loganair are the francise operators for FlyBE and BA.

Got both, bought the MD-11 after the NGX and I rarely fly the NGX now. I find the MD-11 more challenging to fly, and the landing speeds can be fairly high which is a nice sensation. But it maintains good frame rates and is equally capable flying short or long haul. The VC graphics are not quite to the high standard of the NGX but it is still very nice and additionally there is a great 2d cockpit which I find really handy when things are happening fast. Apart from perhaps the Level-D 767, I think it is the best aircraft I've bought, highly recommended.

I beieve you would normally enter the runway first as this will filter the available stars to show only those available for that particular runway. I cannot confirm that this is the case though for every implementation. Best to check the manual for each model.

Both excellent aircraft, I bought the NGX before the MD-11 and find that I've hardly used the NGX since. I find it more challenging and enjoyable to fly despite the NGX being a more sophisticated model. Can't explain why I prefer the MD-11 when logic suggests the NGX is a better all-rounder, I just like its idiosyncrasies compared to the normal Boeing way of doing things. The ideal solution is to own both!

The pooley guide is good but for navigation it is worth looking at http://www.skydemonlight.com/ as well. Also have a look at Plan-G ( http://www.tasoftware.co.uk/planG.htm ).

I'm pretty sure the problem in resolved in Rev.2 of cycle 1207 -at least my copy is not the same as the details you posted, so suggest you just download the most recent version and try again.

Assume you are using Rev 2 of 1206?

Yes that should do it if you are holding between 3000-5000 feet. Between 5000' and FL80 refer to the note: "For holding above 5000 or if ICN DME U/S, track CRK 344, FAP D8.5 CRK. Limit OUTBD D13 CRK. "

I've done this flight a few times on the PMDG 737-800ngx and it is a slippery customer. Trick is not to leave it up to vnav speeds all the way. Get on speed intervention after Robvo and slow it down with flaps and gear when appropriate. I've not needed speedbrakes albeit that the FMC warns that descent isn't possible after Atlam. Reviewing the plates, the full procedure does include a run around the hold, but its not necessary in order to slow down. Best thing about the sim is that you can just try different techniques - just worth remimbering that you are in charge of the aircraft not the FMC :) Good luck - its is possible to do what you want.

I've flown that route a few times, one of my favourites. The hold at GOSDA isn't part of the STAR, so dont worry about it. I'd be at 200-220 at ROBVO with a bit of flaps to help and using manual speed control. Hit ATLAM at 180 Flap 5 and get it down to 160 at GOSDA Flap 15 and gear down. If in doubt slow down earlier rather than later, I tend to fly STARs with HDG select and manual speeds just so I can keep on top of it. Hope this helps.

Both Level-D and Pmdg 747 fly great and are worth having but their cockpits are looking a bit dated graphically The md-11 still looks very good and flies well, the best buy in my opinion. It doesn't operate like a Boeing but once you learn how to use its system, you will love it. Actually I prefer it over the PMDG 737ngx!